Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 14, Issue 7, pp 742–752 | Cite as

Utilising handheld computers to monitor and support patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a UK-based feasibility study

  • N. Kearney
  • L. Kidd
  • M. Miller
  • M. Sage
  • J. Khorrami
  • M. McGee
  • J. Cassidy
  • K. Niven
  • P. Gray
Original Article


Goals of work

Recent changes in cancer service provision mean that many patients spend a limited time in hospital and therefore experience and must cope with and manage treatment-related side effects at home. Information technology can provide innovative solutions in promoting patient care through information provision, enhancing communication, monitoring treatment-related side effects and promoting self-care.

Patients and methods

The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate the acceptability of using handheld computers as a symptom assessment and management tool for patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. A convenience sample of patients (n=18) and health professionals (n=9) at one Scottish cancer centre was recruited. Patients used the handheld computer to record and send daily symptom reports to the cancer centre and receive instant, tailored symptom management advice during two treatment cycles. Both patients’ and health professionals’ perceptions of the handheld computer system were evaluated at baseline and at the end of the project.

Main results

Patients believed the handheld computer had improved their symptom management and felt comfortable in using it. The health professionals also found the handheld computer to be helpful in assessing and managing patients’ symptoms.


This project suggests that a handheld-computer-based symptom management tool is feasible and acceptable to both patients and health professionals in complementing the care of patients receiving chemotherapy.


Cancer Chemotherapy Information technology Symptom management Self-care 


  1. 1.
    Affleck G, Tennen H, Urrows S, Higgins P, Abeles M (1998) Fibromyalgia and women’s pursuit of personal goals: a daily process analysis. Health Psychol 17(1):40–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Affleck G, Apter A, Tennen H, Reisine S, Barrows E, Willard A, Unger J, ZuWallack R (2000) Mood states associated with transitory changes in asthma symptoms and peak expiratory flow. Psychosom Med 62:61–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aaron LA, Turner JA, Mancl L, Brister H, Sawchuk CN (2005) Electronic diary assessment of pain related variables: is reactivity a problem? J Pain 6(2):107–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bader S, Braude R (1998) Patient informatics: creating new partnerships in medical decision making. Acad Med 73(4):408–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berry DL, Trigg LJ, Lober WB, Karras BT, Galligan ML, Austin Seymour M, Martin S (2004) Computerised symptom and quality of life assessment for patients with cancer Part I: development and pilot testing. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(5):E75–E83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bielli E, Carminati F, La Carpa S, Line M, Brunelli C, Tamburini M (2004) A wireless health outcomes monitoring system (WHOMS): development and filed testing with cancer patients using mobile phones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 15(4):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown V, Sitzia J, Richardson A, Hughes J, Hannon H, Oakley C (2001) The development of the Chemotherapy Symptom Assessment Scale (C-SAS): a scale for the routine clinical assessment of the symptom experiences of patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Int J Nurs Stud 38:497–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bryman A (2001) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carlson LE, Speca M, Hagen N, Taenzer P (2001) Computerised quality of life screening in a cancer pain clinic. J Palliat Care 17:46–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Celler B, Lovell N, Basilakis J (2003) Using information technology to improve the management of chronic disease. Med J Aust 179:242–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Craddock R, Adams P, Usui W, Mitchell L (1999) An intervention to increase use and effectiveness of self care measures for breast cancer chemotherapy patients. Cancer Nurs 22(4):312–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Department of Health (2002) Delivering 21st century IT support for the NHS: national strategic programme. Department of Health, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Department of Health (2005a) Supporting people with long term conditions: an NHS and social care model to support local innovation and integration. Department of Health, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Department of Health (2005b) Self care—a real choice: self care support—a practical option. Department of Health, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dodd M (1984) Measuring informational intervention for chemotherapy knowledge and self care behaviour. Res Nurs Health 7:43–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dodd M (1988) Efficacy of proactive information on self care in chemotherapy patients. Patient Educ Couns 11:215–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dodd M, Janson S, Facione N, Faucett J, Froelicher ES, Humphreys J, Lee K, Miaskowski C, Puntillo K, Rankin S, Taylor D (2001) Advancing the science of symptom management. J Adv Nurs 33(5):668–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eng T, Gustafson D (1999) Wired for health and well being: the emergence of interactive health communication. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fieschi M (2002) Information technology is changing the way society sees healthcare delivery. Int J Med Inform 66:85–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Finkelstein J, Hripcsak G, Cabrera M (1998) Telematic system for monitoring of asthma severity in patients’ homes. Medinfo 9(Pt 1):272–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fortner B, Okon T, Schwartzberg L, Tauer K, Houts AC (2003) The cancer care monitor: psychometric testing of a computer administered system for symptom screening and quality of life in adult cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 26(6):1077–1092CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Furstenberg CT, Carter JA, Henderson JV, Ahles TA (2002) Formative evaluation of a multimedia programme for patients about the side effects of treatment. Patient Educ Couns 47:57–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gaertner J, Elsner F, Pollman-Dahmen K, Radbruch L, Sabatowski R (2004) Electronic pain diary: a randomised crossover study. J Pain Symptom Manage 28(3):259–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldsmith D, McDermott D, Safran C (2004) Improving cancer related symptom management with collaborative healthware. Medinfo 11(Pt 1):217–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goodman J, Syme A, Eisma R (2003) Older adults use of computers: a survey. In: 17th annual human computer interaction (HCI) conference, Bath, 8–12 September 2003Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gustafson D, Hawkins R, Boberg E, Pingree S, Serlin R, Graziano F, Chan C (1999) Impact of a patient-centred, computer based health information/support system. Am J Prev Med 16(1):1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Green J, Thorogood N (2004) Qualitative methods for health researchers. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hill WG, Weinert C (2004) An evaluation of an online intervention to provide social support and health education. Comput Inform Nurs 22(5):282–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Holmes S, Edburn E (1989) Patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of symptom distress in cancer. J Adv Nurs 14:840–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horowitz CR, Rein SB, Leventhal H (2004) A story of maladies, misconceptions and mishaps: effective management of heart failure. Soc Sci Med 58(3):631–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jamison R, Raymond S, Levine J, Slawsby E, Nedeljkovic S, Katz N (2001) Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study. Pain 91:277–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kearney N, Miller M, Sermeus W, Hoy D, Vanhaecht K (2000) Multicentre research and the WISECARE experience. J Adv Nurs 3(4):999–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kohlmeier L, Mendex M, McDuffie J, Miller M (1997) Computer-assisted self-interviewing: a multimedia approach to dietary assessment. Am J Clin Nutr 65(Suppl 1):1275–1281Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kurtz M, Kurtz J, Given CC, Given B (1996) Concordance of cancer patient and caregiver symptom reports. Cancer Pract 4(4):185–190Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Le PP, Kohane IS, Weeks JC (1995) Using a pen-based computer to collect health related quality of life and utilities information. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995:839–843Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lobchuk M, Degner L (2002) Symptom experiences: perceptual accuracy between advanced-stage cancer patients and family caregivers in the home care setting. J Clin Oncol 20(16):3495–3507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lobchuk M, Kristjanson L, Degner L, Blood P, Sloan JA (1997) Perceptions of symptom distress in lung cancer patients: 1. Congruence between patients and family caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage 14(3):136–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McCaughan E, Thompson K (2000) Information needs of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at a day-case unit in Northern Ireland. J Clin Nurs 9:851–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McGee M, Gray P (2005) A handheld chemotherapy symptom management system: results from a preliminary outpatient field trial. J Health Inform 11(4):243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Miaskowski C, Dodd M, West C, Paul S, Schumacher K, Tripathy P, Koo P (2004) A randomised clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self care intervention to improve cancer pain management. J Clin Oncol 22(9):1713–1720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mooney KH, Beck SL, Friedman RH, Farzanfar R (2002) Telephone linked care for cancer symptom monitoring: a pilot study. Cancer Pract 10(3):147–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mullen KH, Berry DL, Zierler BK (2004) Computerised symptom and quality of life assessment for patients with cancer Part II: acceptability and usability. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(5):E84–E89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidance on cancer services. Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Neville R, Greene A, McLeod J, Tracy A, Surie J (2002) Letters: mobile phone text messaging can help young people manage asthma. BMJ 325:600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ralston J, Revere D, Robins L, Goldberg H (2004) Patients’ experience with a diabetes support programme based on an interactive electronic medical record: qualitative study. BMJ 328:1159–1162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ream E, Richardson A (1996) The role of information in patients’ adaptation to chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 5(3):132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rhodes VA, Johnson MH, McDaniel RW (1995) Nausea, vomiting and retching: the management of symptom experience. Semin Oncol Nurs 11(4):256–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ropka ME, Guterbock T, Krebs L, Murphy-Ende K, Stetz K, Summers B, Bissonette E, Given B, Mallory G (2000) Year 2000 oncology nursing society research priorities survey. Oncol Nurs Forum 29(3):481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rosenfalck A, Bendtson I (1993) The DIVA system: a computerised diary used in young, type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab 19:25–29Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Scottish Executive (2003) Partnership for care. Scottish Executive, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Scottish Executive Health Department (2005) NHS framework for service change in Scotland. Scottish Executive, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schwartz J, Stone A (1998) Strategies for analysing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychol 17:6–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Stone A, Shiffman S, Schwartz J, Broderick J, Hufford M (2002) Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. BMJ 324:1193–1194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stoop AP, van’t Riet A, Berg M (2004) Using information technology for patients education: realizing surplus value? Patient Educ Couns 54:187–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Taylor PP (2005) Use of handheld devices in critical care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 17(1):45–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tiplady B, Jamieson A, Crompton G (2000) Use of pen-based electronic diaries in an international clinical trial of asthma. Drug Inform J 34(1):129–136Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    VanDenKerkhof D, Goldstein D, Lane J, Rimmer M, Van Dijk J (2003) Using a personal digital assistant enhances gathering of patient data on an acute pain management service: a pilot study. Can J Anaesth 50(4):368–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Velikova G, Wright E, Smith A, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D, Perren T, Stead M, Brown J, Selby P (1999) Automated collection of quality of life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17(3):998–1007PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wright EP, Selby PJ, Crawford M, Gillibrand A, Jonston C, Perren TJ, Rush R, Smith A, Velikov G, Watson K, Gould A, Gill A (2003) Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 21:374–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Kearney
    • 1
  • L. Kidd
    • 1
  • M. Miller
    • 1
  • M. Sage
    • 2
  • J. Khorrami
    • 3
  • M. McGee
    • 4
  • J. Cassidy
    • 3
  • K. Niven
    • 5
  • P. Gray
    • 4
  1. 1.Cancer Care Research Centre, Department of Nursing & Midwifery, R.G. Bomont BuildingUniversity of StirlingScotlandUK
  2. 2.Kelvin ConnectGlasgowScotlandUK
  3. 3.Beatson Oncology CentreGlasgowScotlandUK
  4. 4.Department of Computing ScienceUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  5. 5.Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Department of Nursing & MidwiferyUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK

Personalised recommendations