Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 13, Issue 8, pp 658–662 | Cite as

Views of patients with gynecologic cancer about the end of life

Short Communication

Abstract

This study was designed as a descriptive work assessing the reactions of gynecologic cancer patients to poor prognosis, determining their desires for the location of terminal care, and their preferences about life-sustaining technology. The study was carried out between 2002 and 2003 in a gynecologic oncology clinic of a university hospital located in Istanbul. Data were collected through interviews with 68 patients with gynecologic cancers. Collected data were analyzed through content analysis. It was found that survival is utterly important for the patients and that they wish to stay at hospitals as inpatients and receive life-sustaining treatments during the end-stage disease.

Keywords

Death End-of-life decisions Ethical dilemmas Gynecologic cancer 

References

  1. 1.
    Asai A, Miura Y, Tanabe N, et al (1998) Advance directives and other medical decisions concerning the end of life in cancer patients in Japan. Eur J Cancer 34:1582–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Astudillo W, Mendinueta C, Astudillo E, et al (1995) How can relations be improved between the family and the support team during the care of terminally ill patients? Support Care Cancer 3:72–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown D, Robert SJ, Elkıns TE (1994) Hard choices: the gynecologic cancer patient’s end-of-life preferences. Gynecol Oncol 55:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruera E, Kuehn N, Emery B, et al (1990) Social and demographic characteristics of patients admitted to a palliative care unit. J Palliat Care 6:16–20Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cocle N, Adelhard J, Foley KM (1990) Character of terminal illness in the advanced cancer patients: pain and other symptoms during the last four week of life. J Pain Sympt Manage 5:83–93Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeConnno E, Caraceni A, Groff L (1996) Effect of home care on the place of death of advanced cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 32A:1142–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dimond EP (1992) The oncology nurse’s role in patient advance directives. Oncol Nurs Forum 19:891–896Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Finucane TE, Harper M (1997) Ethical decision-making near the end-of-life. Support Care Cancer 5:274–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gallup DG, Labudovich M, Zambito PR (1982) The gynecologist and the dying cancer patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144:154–161Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kinzbrunner BM (1995) Ethical dilemmas in hospice and palliative care. Support Care Cancer 3:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Merrouche Y, Freyer G, Saltel P (1996) Quality of final care for terminal cancer patients in a comprehensive cancer centre from the point of patients’ families. Support Care Cancer 4:163–68Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miaskowski C (1996) Special needs related to the pain and discomfort of patients with gynecologic cancer. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 25:181–187Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pace B (2000) Decisions about end-of-life care. JAMA 284:2550–2553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peruselli C (1999) Home palliative care for terminal cancer patients: a survey on the final week of life. Palliat Med 13:233–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Price KJ, Kish SK (2001) End-of-life decisions in cancer care. Crit Care Clin 17:805–811Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roberts JA, Brown D, Elkins T, et al (1997) Factors influencing views of patients with gynecologic cancer about end-of-life decisions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:166–172Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stagno SJ, Zhukousky DS, Walsh D (2000) Bioethics: communication and decision-making in advanced disease. Semin Oncol 27:94–100Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wanzer SH, Federman DD, Adelstein SJ (1989) The physician’s responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients. N Engl J Med 320:844–849Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Waters CM (2001) Understanding and supporting African American’s perspectives of end-of-life care planning and decision-making. Qual Health Res 11:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nezihe Kizilkaya Beji
    • 1
  • Nesrin Reis
    • 2
  • Beyhan Bag
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Obstetric and Gynecologic Nursing, Florence Nightingale College of NursingIstanbul UniversitySisli, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Obstetric and Gynecologic Nursing, College of NursingAtatürk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry Nursing, College of NursingAtatürk UniversityErzurumTurkey

Personalised recommendations