Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of training methods
- 1.3k Downloads
Effective communication is increasingly recognised as a core clinical skill. Many health and social care professionals, however, do not feel adequately trained in communicating and in handling interpersonal issues that arise in the care of patients with cancer.
The aim of this paper was to assess the effectiveness of different training methods used in communication training courses for health professionals.
We searched six computerised databases and augmented this with follow-up of references and grey (unpublished) literature. We included all studies evaluating communication training and assessed methodological quality according to the standard grading system of the Clinical Outcomes Group. Data on author, year, setting, objectives, study design and training methods were extracted and compared in tabular format.
A total of 47 studies potentially assessing communication training were identified. Sixteen papers were included evaluating 13 interventions. Four were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (grade a); the others were grade III. Eleven interventions trained health professionals; two trained medical students. Interventions for training in communication skills were characterised by the variety of communication approaches used and a diversity of methods. They were applied to health professionals with very different roles, served different purposes and evaluated a variety of outcome measures: behavioural assessments, patient outcomes and professionals’ self-report.
The best results are to be expected from a training programme that is carried out over a longer period of time. Learner-centred programmes using several methods combining a didactic component focusing on theoretical knowledge with practical rehearsal and constructive feedback from peers and skilled facilitators proved to be very effective. Small groups encouraged more intensive participation. Training in communication for both medical or nursing students and senior health professionals is advisable.
KeywordsCommunication training Health professionals Cancer care Systematic review Training methods
This work was undertaken by King’s College London, which received funding from National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the institute. We thank Lesley Fallowfield for helpful comments on this paper.
- 1.Cassell EJ (1978) The healer’s art: a new approach to the doctor-patient relationship. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
- 3.Stewart MA (1996) Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J 152:1423–1433Google Scholar
- 9.Mishler EG (1984) The discourse of medicine: dialectics of medical interviews. Ablex, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
- 13.Maguire P (1990) Can communication skills be taught? Br J Hosp Med 215–216Google Scholar
- 14.Department of Health (2002) The NHS Cancer Plan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 16.Mann, T (1996) Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines to improve patient care within the NHS. NHS ExecutiveGoogle Scholar
- 33.Booth K, Maguire P (1991) Cancer research campaign interview rating manual. Alphabet Studio, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
- 34.Barrows HS (1971) Simulated patients (programmed patients). The development of a new technique in medical education. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar