Cancer supportive care, improving the quality of life for cancer patients. A program evaluation report
- 988 Downloads
Goals of work
As medical care for cancer has become more specialized in diagnosis, treatment has become more technical and fragmented. In order to help cancer patients and their families, we developed a coordinated program called the Stanford Cancer Supportive Care Program (SCSCP) at the Center for Integrative Medicine at Stanford Hospital and Clinics. The Stanford Cancer Supportive Care Program was initiated in 1999 to provide support for cancer patients, addressing the need for improved physical and emotional well-being and quality of life. This paper is a program evaluation report.
Patients and methods
The number of patient visits grew from 421 in 1999 to 6319 in 2002. This paper describes the utilization of the SCSCP program as assessed by 398 patient visit evaluations during a 9-week period, January 2002 to March 2002. During this time we collected attendance records with demographic data and anonymous questionnaires evaluating each program. Patients were asked to evaluate how the program helped them regarding increase of energy, reduction in stress, restful sleep, pain reduction, sense of hopefulness, and empowerment.
Over 90% of the patients using the SCSCP felt there was benefit to the program. Programs were chosen based on a needs assessment by oncologists, nurse managers, social workers, and patients. Massage, yoga, and qigong classes had the highest number of participants. Qualitative data showed benefit for each program offered.
This evaluation of a free cancer supportive care program initiated in a hospital outpatient setting provides initial evidence of patient satisfaction and improvement in quality of life.
KeywordsCancer Supportive care Physical Emotional Quality of Life
We greatly appreciate the contributions to this paper made by Jean Chan and Louise Maffitt for graphical, statistical, and editorial support. We wish to acknowledge the physicians who participated in and encouraged the development of the SCSCP as well as the many patients who encouraged our efforts. We also wish to acknowledge our many generous supportive donors who wish to remain anonymous, Adventis Oncology, and OrthoBiotech for funding the SCSCP.
- 3.Bleiker EM, van der Ploeg HM, Hendriks JH, Ader HJ (1996) Personality factors and breast cancer development: a prospective longitudinal study. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:1478–1482Google Scholar
- 5.Classen C, Butler LD, Koopman C, Miller E, DiMiceli S, Giese-Davis J, Fobair P, Carlson RW, Kraemer HC, Spiegel D (2001) Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized clinical intervention trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:494–501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ganz PA (1995) Impact of quality of life outcomes on clinical practice. Oncology (Huntingt) 9:61–65Google Scholar
- 20.Ilnyckyj A, Farber J, Cheang MC, Weinerman BH (1994) A randomized controlled trial of psychotherapeutic intervention in cancer patients. Ann R Coll Physicians Surgeons Canada 27:93–96Google Scholar
- 23.Kuchler T, Henne-Bruns D, Rappat S, Graul J, Holst K, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S (1999) Impact of psychotherapeutic support on gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing surgery: survival results of a trial. Hepatogastroenterology 46:322–335Google Scholar
- 24.Lifton JL (1979) The broken connection. A Touchstone book. Simon and Schuster, New York, p.21Google Scholar
- 26.McCorkle R, Strumpf NE, Nuamah IF, Adler DC, Cooley ME, Jepson C, Lusk EJ, Torosian M (2000) A specialized home care intervention improves survival among older post-surgical cancer patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1707–1713Google Scholar
- 28.Ratcliffe MA, Dawson AA, Walker LG (1995) Eysenck personality inventory L-scores in patients with Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Psychooncology 4:39–45Google Scholar
- 30.Rosenbaum EH, Rosenbaum I (1977) Improved communication technique for consultative interviews. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res/Am Soc Clin Oncol 18:316 (C-197)Google Scholar
- 32.Rosenbaum E, Rosenbaum I (1986) Achieving open communication with cancer patients through audio and videotapes. J Psychosoc Oncol 4:91–105Google Scholar
- 33.Rosenbaum EH, Rosenbaum I (2001) Supportive cancer. Sourcebooks, Naperville, ILGoogle Scholar
- 34.Rosenbaum EH, Manuel F, Bray J, Rosenbaum ER, Cerf A (1978) A physical therapy rehabilitation program for cancer patients. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res/Am Soc Clin Oncol 19:369 (C-249)Google Scholar
- 35.Rosenbaum E, Rosenbaum I, Degan S (1981) “Going Home”. A home care training program. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res/Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:395 (C-247)Google Scholar
- 36.Rosenbaum EH, Rosenbaum IR, Sweet A, Mohr A (1981) Audio aids in improving communication with patients. Proceedings of the American Cancer Society Third National Conference on Human Values and Cancer: Psychological, Social, and Ethical Issues, April 23–25, pp 51–57Google Scholar
- 42.Spiegel D, Classen C (2000) Group therapy for cancer patients: a research-based handbook of psychosocial care. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 47.Tross S, Herndon J 2nd, Korzun A, Kornblith AB, Cella DF, Holland JF, Raich P, Johnson A, Kiang DT, Perloff M, Norton L, Wood W, Holland JC (1996) Psychological symptoms and disease-free and overall survival in women with stage II breast cancer. Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:661–667PubMedGoogle Scholar