Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 11, Issue 10, pp 644–651 | Cite as

Associations among awareness of prognosis, hopefulness, and coping in patients with advanced cancer participating in phase I clinical trials

  • Paul R. Helft
  • Fay Hlubocky
  • Ming Wen
  • Christopher K. Daugherty
Original Article



There is considerable debate concerning prognosis in patients with advanced cancer (advanced cancer patients, ACP), but no one has systematically examined the relationship between awareness of prognosis and hopefulness. In this study, the relationships among awareness of prognosis, hopefulness, and coping were examined in a selected group of ACP.

Patients and methods

All subjects were enrolled in phase I trials. Information was obtained from subjects via structured, face-to-face interviews. Subjects provided demographic information, answered questions designed to ascertain their awareness of their prognosis, and completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General instrument (FACT-G).


A total of 179 consecutive subjects enrolled in phase I trials were interviewed. Awareness of prognosis was assessed using a semiquantitative scale. Willingness to provide responses to the question was significantly negatively correlated with hopefulness (r=−0.306, P=0.030). Using items from the FACT-G, hopefulness and coping were positively correlated (r=0.140, P=0.097). Female subjects were more realistic about their prognosis than men (b=0.568, P=0.026). More educated patients had higher response rates to the prognosis questions (OR 1.62, P<0.001), and demonstrated a more realistic awareness of prognosis (b=0.225, P=0.030). Overall, there was a strong association between coping status and responding to the prognosis questions (P=0.033). Patients who reported being "not at all proud of coping" had a lower response rate than patients who reported better coping.


Among the ACP who provided responses, many reported an unrealistic view of their prognosis. Having a more accurate view of prognosis in the face of terminal illness was associated with reduced hopefulness, which may be related to a poorer sense of coping. Finally, the prognosis question utilized in the study was problematic, led to a fairly poor response rate, and may be indicative of the many difficulties present in attempting to accurately assess ACPs' perceptions of their prognosis. Other methods, such as in-depth qualitative methods, may lead to more productive inquiry into ACPs' awareness of their prognosis. Further research into the accurate assessment of awareness of prognosis is needed.


Hope Awareness of prognosis Coping Advanced cancer patients 


  1. 1.
    Amir M (1987) Considerations guiding physicians when informing cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 24:741–748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benzein E, Saveman BI (1998) Nurses' perception of hope in patients with cancer: a palliative care perspective. Cancer Nurs 21:10–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benzein E, Saveman BI (1998) One step towards the understanding of hope: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 35:322–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benzein E, Norberg A, Saveman BI (1998) Hope: future imagined reality. The meaning of hope as described by a group of healthy Pentecostalists. J Adv Nurs 28:1063–1070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cassem NH, Stewart RS (1975) Management and care of the dying patient. Int J Psychiatry Med 6:293–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, et al (1993) The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11:570–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, Enns M, Lander S (1998) Depression, hopelessness, and suicidal ideation in the terminally ill. Psychosomatics 39:366–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chochinov HM, Tataryn DJ, Wilson KG, Ennis M, Lander S (2000) Prognostic awareness and the terminally ill. Psychosomatics 41:500–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christakis NA (1994) Timing of referral of terminally ill patients to an outpatient hospice. J Gen Intern Med 9:314–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daugherty CK (2000) Informed consent, the cancer patient, and phase I clinical trials. Cancer Treat Res 102:77–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daugherty C, Ratain MJ, Grochowski E, Stocking C, Kodish E, Mick R, Siegler M (1995) Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol 13:1062–1072PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daugherty CK, Ratain MJ, Minami H, Banik DM, Vogelzang NJ, Stadler WM, Siegler M (1998) Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials. J Clin Oncol 16:2305–2312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daugherty CK, Banik DM, Janisch LJ, Ratain M (2000) Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview of 144 advanced cancer patients. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 22:6–14Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farran CJ, Herth KA, Popovich JM (1995) Hope and hopeless: critical clinical constructs. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks London New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Forster LE, Lynn J (1988) Predicting life span for applicants to inpatient hospice. Arch Intern Med 148:2540–2543PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, Wenger N, Reding D, Kussin PS, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J, Weeks JC, Phillips RS (1998) Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Am J Med 105:222–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hardy RE, Green DR, Jordan HW, Hardy G (1980) Communication between cancer patients and physicians. South Med J 73:755–757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hinton J (1996) How reliable are relatives' retrospective reports of terminal illness? Patients' and relatives' accounts compared. Soc Sci Med 43:1229–1236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Janisch L, Mick R, Schilsky RL, Vogelzang NJ, O'Brien S, Kut M, Ratain MJ (1994) Prognostic factors for survival in patients treated in phase I clinical trials. Cancer 74:1965–1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kodish E, Stocking C, Ratain MJ, Kohrman A, Siegler M (1992) Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons. J Clin Oncol 10:1810–1816PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koenig RR (1969) Anticipating death from cancer—physician and patient attitudes. Mich Med 68:899–905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kylma J, Isola A (1997) Nursing research on the dynamics of hope in the elderly—a review (in Finnish). Hoitotiede 9:66–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kylma J, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K (1997) Hope in nursing research: a meta-analysis of the ontological and epistemological foundations of research on hope. J Adv Nurs 25:364–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lamont EB, Christakis NA (1999) Some elements of prognosis in terminal cancer. Oncology 13:1165–1170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mackillop WJ, Quirt CF (1997) Measuring the accuracy of prognostic judgments in oncology. J Clin Epidemiol 50:21–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mackillop WJ, Stewart WE, Ginsburg AD, Stewart SS (1988) Cancer patients' perceptions of their disease and its treatment. Br J Cancer 58:355–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maltoni M, Nanni O, Derni S, Innocenti MP, Fabbri L, Riva N, Maltoni R, Amadori D (1994) Clinical prediction of survival is more accurate than the Karnofsky performance status in estimating life span of terminally ill cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 6:764–766Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morse JM, Doberneck B (1995) Delineating the concept of hope. Image J Nurs Sch 27:277–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morse JM, Penrod J (1999) Linking concepts of enduring, uncertainty, suffering, and hope. Image J Nurs Sch 31:145–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Oxenham D, Cornbleet MA (1998) Accuracy of prediction of survival by different professional groups in a hospice. Palliat Med 12:117–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parkes CM (1972) Accuracy of predictions of survival in later stages of cancer. BMJ 2:29–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rees C, Joslyn S (1998) The importance of hope. Nurs Stand 12:34–35Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reynolds PM, Sanson-Fisher RW, Poole AD, Harker J, Byrne MJ (1981) Cancer and communication: information-giving in an oncology clinic. BMJ 282:1449–1451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rustoen T, Hanestad BR (1998) Nursing intervention to increase hope in cancer patients. J Clin Nurs 7:19–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rustoen T, Wiklund I, Hanestad BR, Moum T (1998) Nursing intervention to increase hope and quality of life in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 21:235–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    SUPPORT Principal Investigators (1995) A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 274:1591–1598PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Weeks JC, Cook EF, O'Day SJ, Peterson LM, Wenger N, Reding D, Harrell FE, Kussin P, Dawson NV, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J, Phillips RS (1998) Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA 279:1709–1714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhong Z, Lynn J (1999) Some elements of prognosis in terminal cancer: the Lamont/Christakis reviewed. Oncology 13:1172–1173Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul R. Helft
    • 1
    • 2
    • 7
  • Fay Hlubocky
    • 3
    • 8
  • Ming Wen
    • 6
    • 8
  • Christopher K. Daugherty
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, The Regenstrief Institute for Health CareIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Indiana University Center for BioethicsIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of MedicineThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.The MacLean Center for Clinical Medical EthicsThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  5. 5.Cancer Research CenterThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  6. 6.Department of Health StudiesThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  7. 7.Division of Hematology/Oncology Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  8. 8.Section of Hematology/OncologyThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations