Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

, Volume 128, Issue 9–10, pp 315–319 | Cite as

Use of mental techniques for competition and recovery in professional athletes

  • Mohammad Keilani
  • Timothy Hasenöhrl
  • Immanuel Gartner
  • Christoph Krall
  • Johannes Fürnhammer
  • Fadime Cenik
  • Richard Crevenna
Open Access
original article

Summary

Background

The present study aims to describe knowledge about and usage of mental techniques to prepare before competitions and after sport-associated injuries (SAIs) by professional athletes (team sports) in Austria.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 191 professional athletes (basketball, football, hockey, ice hockey, and volleyball teams, m:f = 142:49, 24 ± 5, 18–39 years) filled in a questionnaire assessing socio-demographic data, duration/frequency of sport practice, rate and severity of SAIs. Furthermore, the use of mental techniques and of spiritual practices before competitions and for recovery after SAI was assessed. The use of mental techniques before competitions and after SAI was correlated with socio-demographic data, duration and frequency of sport practice, and injury patterns of SAIs of the last 24 months.

Results

Approximately, 96 % reported knowledge about at least one mental technique. Only 13 participants used them for regeneration after SAI. Approximately, 31 % of males and 13 % of females reported the use before competitions (p = 0.017). 54 % of participants using spiritual practices used mental techniques before competitions, whereas only 13 % of participants not using spiritual practices used them (p < 0.001). 67 % of participants not using mental techniques before competitions and 88 % using them believed in the effectiveness of mental techniques in the regeneration after a SAI (p = 0.03). A significant increase of the probability of using mental techniques before competition with increasing age was found [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.101, confidence interval (CI) = (1.03, 1.18), p = 0.006].

Conclusion

Mental techniques seem to be well-accepted but rarely used among professional athletes. Further studies are needed to give new information about this relevant topic in professional sports.

Keywords

Professional Athletes Team sports Mental techniques Austrian 

Introduction

Different professional sports are often associated with different behavioral, physical, and psychological symptoms [1]. Examples of such symptoms are sleep disorders, headache, increased muscle tension, negative thoughts, and difficulties concentrating [1]. Psychological issues, like distress, are known to be able to deteriorate performance of athletes during competition [1]. Additionally, athletes are exposed to stress from performance demands imposed by media, their teams, fans, and themselves [2]. Furthermore, distress is supposed to be an important antecedent to sport-associated injuries (SAIs) [3, 4, 5]. SAIs are often accompanied by substantial psychological effects (distress, anxiety) [5, 6, 7].

Different mental techniques might counteract distress of athletes in enhancing their mental skills and therefore their ability to cope with stressors. Mental techniques (such as hypnosis [8, 9, 10], progressive muscle relaxation [11, 12, 13], cognitive interventions [11], biofeedback [14, 15, 16], autogenic training [17, 18], breathing techniques [19], imagery/visualization [12], and others) have been shown to be effective to improve performance in sports, and to facilitate mental recovery from SAI. There are several studies that examined mental skills of athletes associated with success in the Olympic and national/international championships. Nevertheless, most of studies were based on self-reports of athletes and associated with single competitions like Olympic Games and international championships [20]. To our knowledge, no studies have explored the use of mental techniques by professional team athletes before competition and for recovery from SAIs in Middle Europe, yet. Furthermore, there seems to be a need for studies to determine if team athletes really use well-accepted mental techniques like hypnosis progressive muscle relaxation [11, 12, 13], cognitive interventions [11], biofeedback [14, 15, 16], autogenic training [17, 18], breathing techniques [19], imagery/visualization [12]. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to explore the use of mental techniques by professional athletes, all of them were team players (of Austrian basketball, football, hockey, ice hockey, and volleyball teams), and to assess the use of mental techniques depending on socio-demographic characteristics, sport experience, and SAIs.

Methods

The present explorative cross-sectional study took place in cooperation with several Austrian 1st division teams (basketball, football, hockey, ice hockey, and volleyball). A total of 200 professional athletes of the included teams were asked personally to participate. All of them accepted to participate in this study, and were active professional athletes (the duration of their professional experience was longer than 24 months). Exclusion criteria were systemic diseases, pregnancy, participation in other studies, and age below 18. In all, nine subjects answering this invitation were excluded from the study (3 were younger than 18, 6 were included in other studies). Therefore, 191 (n = 191) athletes were included.

The present study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK-Nr. 1890/2012). After explanation of the aim of the study and guarantee of confidentiality, all participants received an anonymous self-administered questionnaire to fill in. The following socio-demographic data of participants were assessed: age, size, weight, partner status, and usual residence (urban/rural). To evaluate sports attitudes, the participants were asked for duration of sport practice (years of active professional practice, competitions/week, weekly training time (hours/week)). Furthermore, the participants were asked for the frequency of musculoskeletal and superficial injuries (SAIs) during the last 24 months. The kind of the most serious injury was reported and grouped into three severity degrees (I mild: laceration; II moderate: contusion, strain/sprain, bruise; III severe: fracture, ligament rupture). Socio-demographic data, sport behavior, injury patterns of SAIs were correlated with the knowledge about (Which mental technique have you heard of?) and the use of different mental techniques (hypnosis, breathing techniques, autogenic training, imagery/visualization, tai chi/qi gong, progressive muscle relaxation, biofeedback, and others) for preparation before competitions and for recovery after SAIs were assessed for correlation with other reported data.

Statistical methods

Demographic data and discipline of respondents are reported by means and standard deviations respectively frequencies. Odds ratios for usage of mental techniques depending on the covariates (age, education, sports experience (years), total training time (hours/week), number of trainings, and number of competitions) were modeled by generalized linear models with logistic regression. Correlation between usage of mental techniques and qualitative variables was analyzed with chi-squared tests (sex, partner status, residency, and other spiritual practices) or Fisher’s exact test (kind of sport). Due to the explorative character of the study no adaptation of the p-value was performed [21]. All calculations were performed with R 3.02 and R Studio.

Results

Demographic data and sports of respondents are presented (Table 1).

Table 1

Demographic data and types of sports of the study population (n = 191 consecutive professional athletes, m:f = 142:49, age: mean = 24 ± 5a, min = 18, max = 39, body mass index: mean = 25 ± 4 kg/m2 min = 18, max = 56)

Characteristic

Number of patients

% of patients

Sex

 

Male

142

74

Female

49

26

Residency

 

Urban

147

77

Rural

23

12

Refused to answer this question

21

11

Partnership

 

Relationship

84

44

Singles

72

38

Refused to answer this question

20

10

Married

15

8

Sports

 

Basketball

54

30

Football

50

27

Volleyball

45

25

Ice Hockey

18

10

Field Hockey

15

8

Table 2 gives the absolute and relative frequencies of participants knowing each included mental technique (knowledge). Approximately, 96 % of participants reported their knowledge about at least one mental technique.

Table 2

Absolute (n) and relative (percentage) frequencies of participants (N = 191) with knowledge about each of the included mental techniques

Mental technique

Unknown n (percentage of all answers)

Known n (percentage of all answers)

Number answer n (percentage of everyone asked; N = 191)

Autogenic training

62 (39 %)

99 (61 %)

30 (16 %)

Breathing techniques

47 (29 %)

113 (71 %)

31 (16 %)

PMR

104 (65 %)

57 (35 %)

30 (16 %)

Hypnosis

56 (35 %)

105 (65 %)

30 (16 %)

Tai chi/qi gong

72 (45 %)

89 (55 %)

30 (16 %)

Imagery/visualization

71 (44 %)

90 (56 %)

30 (16 %)

Others

157 (98 %)

4 (2 %)

30 (16 %)

Biofeedback

118 (62 %)

45 (24 %)

28 (15 %)

Any of these

7 (4 %)

154 (96 %)

30 (16 %)

PMR progressive muscle relaxation

Only 13 participants reported to have used mental techniques for regeneration after an injury/SAI. Therefore, we focused on the use of mental techniques in preparation before competitions; henceforth “use of mental techniques” will refer exclusively to usage in this respect.

Usage of mental techniques is presented in table 3. A total of 17 participants refused to answer this question.

Table 3

Usage of mental techniques for preparation before competitions

Characteristic

No

Yes

Sex

 

Male

86

40

Female

42

6

Residence

 

Urban

105

42

Rural

19

4

Partnership

 

Relationship

63

21

Single

53

19

Married

9

6

Sports

 

Basketball

39

13

Football

33

14

Volleyball

33

8

Ice Hockey

10

5

Field Hockey

8

4

Spirituality

 

Yes

21

25

No

99

16

A significant increase of the probability of using mental techniques with increasing age was found [odds ratio (OR) = 1.101, confidence interval (CI) = (1.03, 1.18), p = 0.006]. Significantly more males than females reported to use mental techniques before competitions [OR = 3.25, 95 % CI = (1.36, 9.09), p = 0.017, Table 3].

Further sociodemographic factors [partner status: p = 0.48, residency: p = 0.39, education: OR = 1.042, 95 % CI = (0.76, 1.42), p = 0.792] showed no significant associations with the use of mental techniques.

Significantly more users than none users of other spiritual practices used mental techniques [p < 0.001, OR = 0.14, 95 % CI = (0.06, 0.32), table 3].

In comparison to inexperienced athletes, a significantly higher percentage of the athletes experienced in using mental techniques in preparation for competitions believed in the effectiveness of mental techniques in the regeneration after injuries [88 % vs. 67 %, OR = 0.3, 95 % CI = (0.10,0.78), p = 0.02].

Variables influencing the usage of mental techniques in preparation for competitions like sex, residence, partnership status, kind of sport and affinity to spirituality are presented in Table 2. The variable “sport” had no significant influence on the tendency to use mental techniques (p = 0.81). Furthermore, no significant correlation between the probability of using mental techniques and the factors sports experience (years), total training time (hours/week), number of trainings, and number of competitions per week was found (OR = 0.97–1.16, p = 0.09–0.97).

Participants were classified into those suffering injuries and those who did not. Mental techniques were used by 30 % of all participants with at least one injury and by 16 % of all participants with no injury. The difference was not significant [OR = 2.21, 95 % CI = (0.91, 6.26), p = 0.14]. Fractures and ruptures were counted as severe injuries, and a new variable assuming value 1 for participants with at least one severe injury in the past and 0 otherwise was defined. Out of all participants without a severe injury, 23 % used mental techniques, whereas 32 % of all patients with at least one severe injury used mental techniques. This difference was not found to be significant [OR = 1.49, 95 % CI = (0.74, 2.99), p = 0.34].

Discussion

Mental techniques are used in sport primarily to enhance recovery from training and competition, to manage anxiety, and to improve performance [22, 23]. They have been shown to be effective in increasing concentration, enhancing motor skills, and improving ability to handle arousal and stress [22, 23]. Furthermore, a consensus statement from six different sports medicine associations indicated that psychological issues of athletes should be considered when treating and coordinating care of injured athletes [1].

The use of mental techniques seems to be widely accepted and well-described within professional athletes at times of big competitions like world championships or the Olympic Games [20]. For example, Gould et al. [20] performed a review on articles concerning psychological preparation of athletes for the Olympic Games. The authors concluded that factors associated with success seem to be certain psychological characteristics, cognitive and behavioral strategies, and personal dispositions. These factors include coping strategies (e.g., thought control, motion control, task focus, relaxed breathing, rational thinking, positive orientation, body awareness, confidence, ability to focus attention and control performance imagery) [20]. Furthermore, use of mental training seems to have a positive influence on success [20]. In comparison, the present study aimed to describe the usage of mental techniques by athletes during regular season training.

The imbalance of the study population is remarkable (142 men and 49 women). The imbalance of sex distribution in the present study results from the sport types investigated, because females are still underrepresented in certain professional sports (especially American football, Ice hockey, Basketball) in Austria.

In the present study, 96 % of participants reported that they knew (they have the knowledge about) at least one mental technique (Table 2).

Approximately, 67 % of participants not using mental techniques in preparation before competitions and 88 % using them before competitions reported to believe in the effectiveness of mental techniques in the regeneration after SAI. Nevertheless, only a minority of the study population reported the use of mental techniques for either recovery after SAI (7 %) or for preparation for competitions (25 %). A possible reason for these contradictory results might be that these professional athletes seem to have insufficient access to sports psychology and coaching in mental techniques in their individual teams. This lack of access to mental techniques might be due to limited awareness for psychological issues of the athletes themselves or of their team coaches.

In comparison, Mann et al. [2] evaluated the availability of sports psychologists and other mental health resources for athletes. The authors reported that the majority of athletes were rarely or never referred to sport psychologists for injury-related and non-injury-related problems [2]. In contrast, Gould et al. [20] explicitly described the implementation of different mental techniques in the preparation process for the Olympic Games but had to admit that their emphasis was mainly directed towards successful athletes.

The use of prayer and other religious-spiritual practices correlated significantly with the use of competition mental techniques before competitions. Some targets of spiritual techniques usually address stress reduction, relaxation, prevention and treatment of anxiety [23]. This indicated that spirituality might promote self-awareness of participants. Therefore, spiritual athletes might be more open to the use of mental techniques.

In the present study, increasing age significantly increased the probability of utilization of mental techniques. In contrast, sports behavior (duration of sport practice, years of active professional practice, competitions/week, and weekly training time) and type of sport were not associated with the use of mental techniques. This indicates that the use of mental techniques in older athletes might be associated with other factors than sport experience. In other studies, more experienced athletes were shown to have better mental skills compared with less experienced controls [20, 24]. Therefore, it remains controversial which factors might influence the probability of utilization of mental techniques in athletes [20, 24].

Male athletes reported to use mental techniques more often than female athletes (Table 3) and partnership status, education and residence did not correlate with use of mental techniques. The reasons for this were not investigated in the present study, which can be seen as a limitation. Further limitations were that only athletes in certain sport types were assessed, and therefore, conclusions on other populations cannot be drawn from the results of the present observation. Furthermore, availability and accessibility of possible mental interventions and techniques were not assessed in detail.

Conclusion

Although psychological issues of athletes should be considered when treating and coordinating care of injured athletes [22], the current study revealed that mental techniques were well-accepted but rarely used from the study population, namely professional athletes (Austrian and International players) from Austrian 1st division teams.

Due to the fact that different mental techniques are known to counteract distress of athletes, to be effective to improve performance, and to facilitate mental recovery from SAI, their use should be of high interest to increase performance and results especially for professional teams. Therefore, further studies are urgently needed and should be designed with respect to the limitations of the present study to give new information about this—to our opinion—in the future quite relevant topic to optimize performance in professional sports.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

M. Keilani, T. Hasenöhrl, I. Gartner, C. Krall, J. Fürnhammer, F. Cenik, and R. Crevenna declare that there are no actual or potential conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

References

  1. 1.
    American College of Sports Medicine; American Academy of Family Physicians; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; American Medical Society for Sports Medicine; American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine; American Osteopathic Academy of Sports Medicine. Psychological issues related to injury in athletes and the team physician: a consensus statement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:2030–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mann BJ, Grana WA, Indelicato PA, et al. A survey of sports medicine physicians regarding psychological issues in patient-athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:2140–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leddy MH, Lambert MJ, Ogles BM. Psychological consequences of athletic injury among high-level competitors. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994;65:347–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quackenbush N, Crossman J. Injured athletes: a study of emotional responses. J Sport Behav. 1994;17:178–89.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith AM. Psychological impact of injuries in athletes. Sports Med. 1996;22:391–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clement D, Arvinen-Barrow M, Fetty T. Psychosocial responses during different phases of sport-injury rehabilitation: a qualitative study. J Athl Train. 2015;50:95–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nippert AH, Smith AM. Psychologic stress related to injury and impact on sport performance. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008;19:399–418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barker J, Jones M, Greenlees I. Assessing the immediate and maintained effects of hypnosis on self-efficacy and soccer wall-volley performance. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010;32:243–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iglesias A, Iglesias A. Clinical hypnosis with a Little League baseball population: performance enhancement and resolving traumatic experiences. Am J Clin Hypn. 2011;53:183–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liggett DR. Enhancing imagery through hypnosis: a performance aid for athletes. Am J Clin Hypn. 2000;43:149–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kearns DW, Crossman J. Effects of a cognitive intervention package on the free-throw performance of varsity basketball players during practice and competition. Percept Mot Skills. 1992;75:1243–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newmark TS, Bogacki DF. The use of relaxation, hypnosis, and imagery in sport psychiatry. Clin Sports Med. 2005;24:973–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Solberg EE, Ingjer F, Holen A, et al. Stress reactivity to and recovery from a standardised exercise bout: a study of 31 runners practising relaxation techniques. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34:268–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bar-Eli M, Blumenstein B. Performance enhancement in swimming: the effect of mental training with biofeedback. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7:454–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paul M, Garg K. The effect of heart rate variability biofeedback on performance psychology of basketball players. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012;37:131–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prinsloo GE, Rauch HG, Derman WE. A brief review and clinical application of heart rate variability biofeedback in sports, exercise, and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Sportsmed. 2014;42:88–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hashim HA, Hanafi Ahmad Yusof H. The effects of progressive muscle relaxation and autogenic relaxation on young soccer players’ mood states. Asian J. Sports Med. 2011;2:99–105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mikicin M, Kowalczyk M. Audio-Visual and Autogenic Relaxation Alter Amplitude of Alpha EEG Band, causing improvements in mental work performance in athletes. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2015;40(3):219–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Christakou A, Lavallee D. Rehabilitation from sports injuries: from theory to practice. Perspect Public Health. 2009;129:120–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gould D, Maynard I. Psychological preparation for the Olympic Games. J Sports Sci. 2009;27:1393–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bender R, Lange S. Adjusting for multiple testing — when and how? J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:343–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Covassin T, Beidler E, Ostrowski J, et al. Psychosocial aspects of rehabilitation in sports. Clin Sports Med. 2015;34:199–212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weinberg RS, Comar W. The effectiveness of psychological interventions in competitive sport. Sports Med. 1994;18:406–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boes R, Harung HS, Travis S, Pensgaard AM. Mental and physical attributes defining world-class Norwegian athletes: content analysis of interviews. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24:422–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Keilani
    • 1
  • Timothy Hasenöhrl
    • 1
  • Immanuel Gartner
    • 1
  • Christoph Krall
    • 2
  • Johannes Fürnhammer
    • 1
  • Fadime Cenik
    • 1
  • Richard Crevenna
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Section of Medical Statistics, Core Unit for Medical Statistics and InformaticsMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations