Rising prevalence of back pain in Austria: considering regional disparities
Back pain is the most common form of musculoskeletal conditions and leads to high health care costs. Information about geographic variations in highly prevalent diseases/disorders represents important implications for public health planning to face structural challenges. The present study aims to investigate regional trends in the prevalence of back pain and the role of obesity and social inequalities among Austrian adults.
A secondary data analysis based on five nationally representative cross-sectional surveys (1973–2007) was carried out (N = 178,818). Back pain was measured as self-reported presence. Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) was adjusted for self-report bias. For the regional analyses, Austria was divided into Western, Central and Eastern Austria. A relative index of inequality (RII) was computed to quantify the extent of social inequality.
A continuous rise in back pain prevalence was observed in the three regions and among all investigated subgroups. In 2007 the age-standardised prevalence was similar in Central (36.9 %), Western (35.2 %) and Eastern Austria (34.3 %). The absolute change in back pain prevalence was highest among obese subjects in Central Austria (women: + 29.8 %, men: + 32.5 %). RIIs were unstable during the study period and in 2007 highest in Eastern Austria.
Variation and trends in back pain are not attributable to geographic variation in Austria: an assumed East–West gradient in Austria has not been confirmed. Nevertheless our study confirms that back pain dramatically increased in all Austrian regions and investigated subgroups. This worrying trend should be further monitored and public health interventions should be implemented increasingly, especially among obese women and men.
KeywordsBack pain Geographic variation Long-term trend Obesity Social inequality
- 4.Pedisic C, Pranic S, Juraic D. Relationship of back and neck pain with quality of life in the Croatian general population. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 36(5):267–275.Google Scholar
- 11.Laut KG, Mocroft A, Lazarus J, Reiss P, Rockstroh J, Karpov I, Rakhmanova A, Knysz B, Moreno S, Gargalianos P, Lundgren J, Kirk O; Eurosida in Eurocoord. Regional differences in self-reported HIV care and management in the EuroSIDA study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(4 Suppl 3):19504. doi:10.7448/IAS.17.4.19504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Tamayo T, Schipf S, Meisinger C, Schunk M, Maier W, Herder C, Roden M, Nauck M, Peters A, Völzke H, Rathmann W. Regional differences of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes prevalence are not explained by known risk factors. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113154. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113154.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Dorner T. Public Health Herausforderungen in Bezug auf körperliche Aktivität. Sport Präventivmed. 2009;39(4):36–42.Google Scholar
- 24.Fernández des Las Penas C, Alonso-Blanco C, Hernández-Barrera V, Palacios-Cena D, Jiménez-Garcia R, Carrasco-Garrido P. Has the prevalence of neck pain and low back pain changed over the last 5 years? A population-based national study in Spain. Spine J 13(9):1069–1076.Google Scholar
- 27.Austria S. Regionale Unterschiede in der Sterblichkeit. 2008. http://www.statistik.at/web_de/dynamic/statistiken/gesundheit/030155.
- 28.Lidegaard M, Jensen RB, Andersen CH, et al. Effect of brief daily resistance training on occupational neck/shoulder muscle activity in office workers with chronic pain: randomized controlled trial. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013. doi: 10.1155/2013/262386Google Scholar
- 29.Steffens D, Maher CG, Li Q, Ferreira ML, Pereira LSM, Koes BW, Latimer J. Weather does not affect back pain: results from a case-crossover study. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66:1867–72.Google Scholar
- 31.[Evidence and consensus based Austrian guidelines for management of acute and chronic nonspecific backache]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007;119(5–6):189–97.Google Scholar