Advertisement

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

, Volume 127, Issue 13–14, pp 561–566 | Cite as

Limb salvage and functional outcomes among patients with traumatic popliteal artery injury: a review of 64 cases

  • Ines Vielgut
  • Markus Gregori
  • Lukas A. Holzer
  • Mathias Glehr
  • Sharif Hashemi
  • Patrick Platzer
original article

Summary

Background

Traumatic popliteal arterial injury carries the greatest risk of limb loss among all peripheral vascular injuries and is associated with high levels of morbidity and worse functional outcomes. The purpose of this study is to analyse the functional outcome among patients with popliteal artery injury (PAI) due to blunt and penetrating trauma and identify influencing factors.

Methods

We critically reviewed 64 cases of PAI due to blunt and penetrating trauma treated at our institution over a 20-year period. We evaluated the influence of parameters, such as patient demographics, injury mechanism, initial ISS and performed interventions, on limb amputation rates and functional outcomes. Functional outcome was examined within the 12-months follow-up using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score for feeding, expression and locomotion. FIM scores for each category ranged from 1 (full assistance required) to 4 (fully independent), with a maximum total FIM score of 12 representing full independence.

Results

The mechanism of injury was blunt in 55 % and penetrating in 45 % of the patients. The overall amputation rate in our series was 28 %. Out of these, 83.3 % of all performed amputations in our series were due to blunt trauma and 88.6 % of all blunt trauma patients were severely injured (ISS > 9) or polytraumatized (ISS > 15). Blunt mechanism of injury has also shown a negative effect on the functional outcome. Analysis of the 1-year clinical follow-up showed that 30 patients (65.3 %) returned to their normal activity level within 1 year after trauma. A total of 16 patients (34.7 %) were recorded to have limited activity levels, 76.5 % of them sustained a blunt trauma. Using the FIM score to quantify the level of disability, we detected significantly worse results in both FIM total (8.8 vs. 10.4) and FIM locomotion score (3.1 vs. 2.7) following blunt trauma.

Conclusion

The main findings of the present study were that PAI due to blunt trauma is associated with a high percentage of severely injured or even polytraumatized patients. Amputation rates following blunt trauma were significantly higher compared to penetrating trauma. Functional independence measurement, assessed 12 months after injury, also showed significantly worse results in both FIM total and FIM locomotion score after blunt trauma. Other factors that seem to have a negative influence on the outcome in terms of amputation rates after PAI are patient’s age, presence of associated injuries and prolonged lower extremity ischemia.

Keywords

Polytrauma Popliteal artery injury (PAI) Functional outcome 

References

  1. 1.
    Hossny A. Blunt popliteal artery injury with complete lower limb ischemia: is routine use of temporary intraluminal arterial shunt justified? J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(1):61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta R, Quinn P, Rao S, Sleunarine K. Popliteal artery trauma. A critical appraisal of an uncommon injury. Injury. 2001;32:357–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wagner WH, Calkins ER, Weaver FA, Goodwin JA, Myles RA, Yellin AE. Blunt popliteal lartery trauma: one hundred consecutive injuries. J Vasc Surg. 1988;7:736–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Halvorson JJ, Anz A, Langfitt M, Deonanan JK, Scott A, Teasdall RD, Carroll EA. Vascular injury associated with extremity trauma: initial diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:495–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mullenix PS, Steele SR, Andersen CA, Starnes BW, Salim A, Martin MJ. Limb salvage and outcomes among patients with traumatic popliteal vascular injury: an analysis of the National TraumaData Bank. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(1):94–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim JW, Sung CM, Cho SH, Hwang SC. Vascular Injury associated with blunt trauma without dislocation of the knee. Yonsei Med J. 2010;51(5):790–2.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chapman JA. Popliteal artery damage in closed injuries of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985;67:420–3.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright LB, Matchett WJ, Cruz CP, James CA, Culp WC, Eidt JF, McCowan TC. Popliteal artery disease: diagnosis and treatment. RadioGraphics. 2004;24:467–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drapanas T, Hewitt RL, Weichert RF 3rd, Smith AD. Civilian vascular injuries: a critical appraisal of three decades of management. Ann Surg. 1979;172:351–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hollis JD, Daley BJ. 10-year review of knee dislocations: is arteriography always necessary? J Trauma. 2005;59:672–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Welling RE, Kakkasseril J, Cranley JJ. Complete dislocations of the knee with popliteal vascular injury. J Trauma. 1988;21:450–3.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Twaddle BC, Hunter JC, Chapman JR, Simonian PT, Escobedo EM. MRI in acute knee dislocation. A prospective study of clinical, MRI and surgical findings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:573–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paris IB, Raptis S, Fitridge R. Arterial injury in the lower limb from blunt trauma. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997;67:25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karavias D, Korovessis P, Filos KS, Siamplis D, Petrocheilos J, Androulakis J. Major vascular lesions associated with orthopaedic injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(2):180–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huynh TT, Pham M, Griffin LW, et al. Management of distal femoral and popliteal arterial injuries: an update. Am J Surg. 2006;192(6):773–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Starr AJ, Hunt JL, Reinert CM. Treatment of femur fracture with associated vascular injury. J Trauma. 1996;40(1):17–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McHenry TP, Holcomb JB, Aoki N, Lindsey RW. Fractures with major vascular injuries from gunshot wounds: implications of surgical sequence. J Trauma. 2004;53(4):717–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohammadzade MA, Akbar MH. Presenting features and surgical outcome of popliteal artery trauma in a civilian set-up. Acta Medica Iranica 2003;41(4):273–6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johansen K, Bandyk D, Thiele B, Hansen ST. Temporary intra-luminal shunts: resolution of a management dilemma in complex vascular injuries. J Trauma. 1982;22:395–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gifford SM, Aidinian G, Clouse WD, et al. Effect of temporary shunting on extremity vascular injury: an outcome analysis from the Global War on Terror vascular injury initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(3):549–56.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fowler J, Macintyre N, Rehman S, Gaughan JP, Leslie S. The importance of surgical sequence in the treatment of lower extremity injuries with concomitant vascular injury: a metaanalysis. Injury. 2009;40(1):72–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Downs AR, MacDonald P. Popliteal artery injuries: civilian experience with sixty-three patients during a 24 year period (1960 through 1984). J Vasc Surg. 1986;4:55–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lim LT, Michuda MS, Flanigan P, Pankovich A. Popliteal artery trauma: 31 consecutive cases without amputation. Arch Surg. 1980;115:1307–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harrell DJ, Spain DA, Bergamini TM, Miller FB, Richardson JD. Blunt popliteal artery trauma: a challenging injury. Am Surg. 1997;63:21–5.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sriussadaporn S, Pak-art R. Temporary intravascular shunt in complex extremity vascular injuries. J Trauma. 2002;52:1129–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hafez HM, Woolgar J, Robbs JV. Lower extremity arterial injury: results of 550 cases and review of risk factors associated with limb loss. J Vasc Surg. 2001;3:1212–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ines Vielgut
    • 1
    • 2
  • Markus Gregori
    • 1
  • Lukas A. Holzer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mathias Glehr
    • 2
  • Sharif Hashemi
    • 3
  • Patrick Platzer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Trauma SurgeryMedical University ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryMedical University GrazGrazAustria
  3. 3.Department of Trauma SurgeryTulln Danube Region State ClinicTullnAustria

Personalised recommendations