Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

, Volume 125, Issue 9–10, pp 254–260

Resistance index in mural arteries of thickened bowel wall: predictive value for Crohn disease activity assessment in pediatric patients

  • I. Sjekavica
  • V. Barbarić-Babić
  • V. Šunjara
  • M. Kralik
  • I. Senečić-Čala
  • M. Dujšin
  • R. Štern-Padovan
original article

Summary

Objective

To define reliable Doppler parameters in mural arteries of affected bowel loops for quantitative assessment of Crohn disease (CD) activity in pediatric population and compare Doppler parameters with Pediatric Crohn Disease Activity Index (PCDAI).

Patients and methods

Thirty-four pediatric patients (7 with inactive, 27 with active disease of different severity; 13 male and 21 female; mean age 13; range 7–18) with CD were prospectively evaluated by Doppler ultrasound (DUS) of affected bowel segments. Using semiquantitative color and power Doppler assessment of vascularization of thickened bowel wall and mesentery, patients were divided in four grades. Spectral measurements (peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), resistance index (RI)) of mural arteries were compared with PCDAI.

Results

There was a significant difference in distribution of semiquantitative color values between inactive and active group. PSV and EDV values showed no significant difference between inactive and active group, while mean RI was significantly higher in the inactive group. RI was also significantly negatively correlated with PCDAI.

Conclusion

Intensity of color and power Doppler signals and RI measurement of mural arteries in thickened bowel wall is linked to CD activity and therefore might be of use in pediatric patients.

Keywords

Pediatric Crohn disease Doppler ultrasound Disease activity Bowel wall Resistance index 

Resistance Index in intramuralen Arterien der verdickten Darmwand: Vorhersagewert bei der Beurteilung der Krankheitsaktivität des Morbus Crohn in pädiatrischen Patienten

Zusammenfassung

Ziel

Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, die zuverlässigen Doppler-Parameter in den intramularen Arterien der betroffenen Darmschlingen zur quantitativen Bewertung der Aktivität des Morbus Crohn (CD) bei der pädiatrischen Population zu definieren und die Doppler-Parameter mit dem pädiatrischem Morbus Crohn Aktivitätsindex (PCDAI) zu vergleichen.

Patienten und Methoden

Der Zustand von 34 pädiatrischen Patienten (7 mit inaktiver, 27 mit aktiver Erkrankung unterschiedlichen Schweregrades, 13 männliche und 21 weibliche, Alter 7–18, Durschnittsalter 13) mit M. Crohn wurde prospektiv anhand des Doppler-Ultraschall (DUS) betroffener Darmsegmente ausgewertet. Anhand der semi-quantitativen Farb- und Power-Doppler-Beurteilung der Vaskularisation der verdickten Darmwand und des Mesenteriums wurden die Patienten in 4 Gruppen unterteilt. Die spektrale Messungen (die maximale systolische Strömungsgeschwindigkeit – PSV, die enddiastolische Strömungsgeschwindigkeit – EDV, der Resistance-Index – RI) intramuraler Arterien wurden mit PCDAI verglichen.

Ergebnisse

Es bestand ein signifikanter Unterschied in der Verteilung der semi-quantitativen Farbwerte zwischen der inaktiven und aktiven Gruppe. PSV und EDV-Werte zeigten keinen signifikanten Unterschied zwischen der inaktiven und der aktiven Gruppe, während der mittlere RI in der inaktiven Gruppe signifikant höher war. Der RI war ebenfalls signifikant negativ mit dem PCDAI korreliert.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Intensität der Farb- und Power-Doppler-Signale und die RI-Messung in den intramuralen Arterien der verdickten Darmwand stehen im Zusammenhang mit der Aktivität des Morbus Crohn und können daher bei pädiatrischen Patienten von Nutzen sein.

Schlüsselwörter

Pädiatrischer Morbus Crohn Doppler-Ultraschall Krankheitsaktivität Darmwand Resistance Index 

References

  1. 1.
    Wills JS, Lobis IF, Denstman FJ. Crohn disease: state of the art. Radiology. 1997;202: 597–610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ali SI, Carty HML. Pediatric Crohn’s disease: a radiological review. Eur Radiol. 2000;10: 1085–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Charron M, Del Rosario JF, Kocoshis S. Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: assessment with scintigraphy with 99 mTc white blood cells. Radiology. 1999;212(2):507–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kjeldsen J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. Assessment of disease severity and activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;28:1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tromm A, Tromm CD, Huppe D, Schwegler U, Krieg M, May B. Evaluation of different laboratory tests and activity indices reflecting the inflammatory activity of Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;27:774–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rioux M, Gagnon J. Imaging modalities in the puzzling world of inflammatory bowel disease. Abdom Imaging. 1997;22:173–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mako EK, Mester AR, Tarjan Z, Karlinger K, Toth G. Enteroclysis and spiral CT examination in diagnosis and evaluation of small bowel Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol. 2000;35:168–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Rousomoustakal M, Maris T, Gourtsoyiannis N. MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. Radiographics. 2001;21:161–72.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maconi G, Radice E, Greco S, Bianchi Porro G. Bowel ultrasound in Crohn’s disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:93–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miao YM, Koh Dm, Amin Z, Healy JC, Chinn RJ, Zeegen R, et al. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of active bowel segments in Crohn’s disease. Clin Radiol. 2002;57(10):913–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pascu M, Roznowski AB, Muller H-P, Adler A, Wiedenmann B, Dignass AU. Clinical relevance of transabdominal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory bowel disease of the terminal ileum and large bowel. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10:373–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, Amin Z, Zeegen R, Westaby D, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(6):1325–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Colombel JF, Solem CA, Sandborn WJ, Booya F, Loftus EV, Harmsen WS, et al. Quantitative measurement and visual assessment of ileal Crohn’s disease activity by computed tomography enterography: correlation with endoscopic severity and C reactive protein. Gut. 2006;55:1561–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bodily KD, Fletcher JG, Solem CA, Johnson DC, Fidler JL, Barlow JM, et al. Crohn disease: mural attenuation and thickness at contrast-enhanced CT enterography-correlation with endoscopic and histologic findings of inflammation. Radiology. 2006;238:505–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L, Marollo M, Masciangelo R, Caprilli R, et al. Evaluation of Crohn disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:219–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siegel MJ, Friedland JA, Hildebolt CF. Bowel wall thickening in children: differentiation with US. Radiology. 1997;203:631–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Valette PJ, Rioux M, Pilleul F, Saurin JC, Fouque P, Henry L. Ultrasonography of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(10):1859–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spalinger J, Patriquin H, Miron MC, Marx G, Herzog D, Dubois J, et al. Doppler US in patients with Crohn disease: vessel density in the diseased bowel reflects disease activity. Radiology. 2000;217:787–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heyne R, Rickes S, Bock P, Schreiber S, Wermke W, Lochs H. Noninvasive evaluation of activity in inflammatory bowel disease by power Doppler sonography. Z Gastroenterol. 2002;40(3):171–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tarjan Z, Toth G, Gyorke T, Mester A, Karlinger K, Mako EK. Ultrasound in Crohn’s disease of the small bowel. Eur J Radiol. 2000;35(3):176–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scholbach T, Herrero I, Scholbach J. Dynamic Color Doppler sonography of intestinal wall in patients with Crohn disease compared with healthy subjects. J Pediatr Gastr Nutr. 2004;39:524–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Migaleddu V, Quaia E, Scano D, Virgilio G. Inflammatory activity in Crohn disease: ultrasound findings. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:589–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Di Sabatino A, Fulle I, Ciccocioppo R, Ricevuti L, Tinozzi FP, Tinozzi S, et al. Doppler enhancement after intravenous Levovist injection in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002;8:251–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kratzer W, von Tirpitz C, Mason R, Reinshagen M, Adler G, Moller P, et al. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography of the intestinal wall in differentiation of hypervascularized and hypovascularized intestinal obstructions in patients with Crohn’s disease. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:149–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Serra C, Menozzi G, Labate AM, Giangregorio F, Gionchetti P, Beltrami M, et al. Ultrasound assessment of vascularization of the thickened terminal ileum wall in Crohn’s disease patients using a low-mechanical index real-time scanning technique with a second generation ultrasound contrast agent. Eur J Radiol. 2007;62:114–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schreyer AG, Finkenzeller T, Gossmann H, Daneschnejad M, Muller-Wille R, Schacherer D, et al. Microcirculation and perfusion with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in Crohn’s disease: first results with linear contrast harmonic imaging (CHI). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2008;40:143–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Esteban JM, Maldonado L, Sanchiz V, Minguez M, Benages A. Activity of Crohn’s disease assessed by Color Doppler ultrasound analysis of the affected loops. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1423–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sjekavica I, Barbarić-Babić V, Krznarić Ž, Molnar M, Čuković-Čavka S, Ŵern-Padovan R. Assessment of Crohn Disease activity by Doppler ultrasound of the superior mesenteric artery and mural arteries in thickened bowel wall: cross-sectional study. Croat Med J. 2007;48:822–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haber HP, Busch A, Ziebach R, Stern M. Bowel wall thickness measured by ultrasound as a marker of Crohn’s disease activity in children. Lancet. 2000;55(4):1239–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Futagami Y, Haruma K, Hata J, Fujimura J, Tani H, Okamoto E, et al. Development and validation of an ultrasonographic activity index of Crohn’s disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12(12):1355–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mayer D, Reinshagen M, Mason RA, Muche R, von Tirpitz C, Eckelt K, et al. Sonographic measurement of thickened bowel wall segments: a quantitative parameter for activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Z Gastroenterol. 2000;38(4):295–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yekeler E, Danalioglu A, Movasseghi B, Yilmaz S, Karac C, Kaymakoglu S, et al. Crohn disease activity evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography of the superior mesenteric artery and the affected small-bowel segments. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:59–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thomson M, Rao P, Berger L, Rawat D. Graded compression and power Doppler ultrasonography versus endoscopy to assess pediatric Crohn disease activity pre- and post treatment. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54:404–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    De Pascale A, Garofalo G, Perna M, Priola S, Fava C. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in Crohn’s disease. Radiol Med. 2006;111:539–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rapaccini GL, Pompili M, Orefice R, Covino M, Riccardi L, Cedrone A, Gasbarrini G. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler of the intestinal wall in the evaluation of patients with Crohn disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:188–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Robotti D, Cammarota T, Debani P, Sarno A, Astegiano M. Activity of Crohn disease: value of color-power-Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging. 2004;29:648–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Migaleddu V, Scanu AM, Quaia E, Cossu-Rocca P, Pina-Dore M, Scanu D et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;137: 43–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Girlich C, Jung EM, Iesalnieks I, Schreyer AG, Zorger N, Strauch U, et al. Quantitative assessment of bowel wall vascularization in Crohn’s disease with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and perfusion analysis. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2009;43:141–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Quaia E, Migaleddu V, Baratella E, Pizzolato R, Rossi A, Grotto M, et al. The diagnostic value of small bowel wall vascularity after sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble injection in patients with Crohn’s disease. Correlation with the therapeutic effectiveness of specific antiinflammatory treatment. Eur J Radiol. 2008;69:438–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF, Cosgrove DO, Gilja OH, Bachmann Nielsen M. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on nonhepatic applications. Ultraschall in Med. 2011;33:33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Sjekavica
    • 1
  • V. Barbarić-Babić
    • 1
  • V. Šunjara
    • 1
  • M. Kralik
    • 1
  • I. Senečić-Čala
    • 2
  • M. Dujšin
    • 2
  • R. Štern-Padovan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb School of MedicineZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric GastroenterologyUniversity Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb School of MedicineZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations