Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

, Volume 122, Issue 5–6, pp 123–125 | Cite as

Science & gender: vision and mission

Editorial

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ash A, Carr P, Goldstein R, Friedman R (2004) Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: is there equity? Ann Intern Med 141: 205–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nonnemaker L (2000) Women physicians in academic medicine – new insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med 342: 399–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Keiser J, Utzinger J, Singer BH (2003) Gender composition of editorials boards of general medicine journals. Lancet 362: 1336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, Nattinger AB (1995) Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine: glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA 273: 1022–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jagsi R, Guancial E, Worobey C, Henault L, Chang y, Starr R, et al (2006) The gender gap in autorship of academic medical literature – a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med 355: 281–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Heckenberg A, Druml Ch (2010) Gender aspects in medical publication – the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. Wien Klin Wochenschr 122: 141–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sidhu R, Rajashekar P, Lavin V, Parry J, Attwood J, Holdcroft A, Sanders D (2009) The gender imbalance in academic medicine: a study of female authorship in the United Kingdom. J R Soc Med 102: 337–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Roter D, Hall J, Aoki Y (2002) Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA 288: 756–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertakis K, Franks P, Azari R (2003) Effects of physician gender on patient satisfaction. J Am Med Women Assoc 58: 68–74Google Scholar
  10. Kim C, Mcewen L, Gerzoff R, Marrero D, Mangione C, Selby J, Herman W (2005) Is physician gender associated with the quality of diabetes care? Diabetes Care 28: 1594–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kastenhofer K, Röggla G (2007) Is women scientists' approach to science more interdisciplinary? Wien Klin Wochenschr 119: 678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Arain F, Kuniyoshi F, Abdalrhim A, Miller V (2009) Sex/gender medicine. The biological basis for personalized care in cardiovascular medicine. Circ J 73: 1774–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kautzky-Willer A, Handisurya A (2009)Metabolic diseases and associated complications: sex and gender matter! Eur J Clin Invest 39: 631–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang Y, Carlin A, Faustino P, Pagan Motta M, Hamad M, He R, Watanuki Y, Pinnow E, Khan (2009) Participation of women in clinical trials for new drugs approved by the food and drug administration in 2000–2002. J Women's Health 18: 303–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berlin J, Ellenberg S (2009) Inclusion of women in clinical trials. BMC 9: 7–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Verdonk P, Benschop YW, de Haes HC, Lagro-Janssen TL (2009) From gender bias to gender awareness in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theor Pract 14: 135–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamel M, Ingelfinger J, Phimister E, Solomon C (2006) Women in academic medicine – progress and challenges. N Engl J Med 355: 310–2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit of Gender Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine IIIMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations