BHM Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte

, Volume 160, Issue 7, pp 346–351 | Cite as

Evaluation of Performance of an Amine Based and an Imidazoline Based Gas Condensate Inhibitor Tested with a High Velocity Laboratory Test Rig

Originalarbeit
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

An amine based CO2 corrosion inhibitor and an imidazoline based CO2 corrosion inhibitor have been tested in a two-phase laboratory flow loop system under conditions of a gas condensate well in Austria. After a detailed description of the experimental setups, degradation rates of material API L-80 (UNS G41300) as function of flow velocity and inhibitor dosage are presented. Further, the influence of chloride addition on inhibitor performance has been investigated. All results are discussed with respect to critical inhibitor concentration to reach nearly 100 % inhibitor efficiency.

Inhibitor A exhibits alkylamine as an active ingredient dissolved in ethylene glycol and different alcohols, and the effect of inhibitor B is based on imidazoline dissolved in different alcohols. Results demonstrate that the test rig delivers reasonable results with respect to inhibitor protection rates. Independent of superficial flow velocities (tested between 3 and 35 m/s), both inhibitors exhibit a good performance as long as dosed above their critical concentration. The critical concentration is clearly below 100 ppm to the liquid phase. The addition of chlorides affects the performance of the alkylamine based inhibitor significantly more than in case of the imidazoline.

Keywords

Flow induced corrosion Inhibitor Flow-loop 

Vergleich der Inhibitorschutzwirkung eines amin- und eines imidazolin- basierenden Korrosionsinhibitors in einer Laborprüfanlage unter hohen Strömungsgeschwindigkeiten

Zusammenfassung

Ein Amin-basierenender CO2-Korrosionsinhibitor und ein Imidazolin-basierender CO2-Korrosionsinhibitor wurden in einem Zweiphasen-Laborprüfsystem unter Bedingungen getestet, die einer österreichischen Gassonde entsprechen. Nach einer ausführlichen Beschreibung der Versuchsanordnung werden die Abtragsraten eines API L-80 (UNS G41300) Stahles in Abhängigkeit von Strömungsgeschwindigkeit und Inhibitordosierung gezeigt. Zusätzlich wurde der Einfluss von Chloriden auf die Inhibitorschutzwirkung untersucht. Inhibitor A enthält als Wirkstoff Alkylamin gelöst in Ethylenglykol und verschiedenene weitere Alkohole. Die Wirkung von Inhibitors B basiert auf Imidazolin als primäre Wirkkomponente. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass der Prüfstand mit der Praxis vergleichbare Ergebnisse hinsichtlich der Dosierung von Inhibitoren liefert. Unabhängig von der Strömungsgeschwindigkeit (getestet zwischen 3 und 35 m/s) zeigen beide Inhibitoren eine gute Schutzwirkung, so lange sie über ihrer kritischen Konzentration dosiert sind. Die kritische Konzentration liegt bei beiden deutlich unter 100 ppm. Die Zugabe von Chloriden beeinflusst die Wirkung des Amin-basierenden Inhibitors deutlich mehr als die des Imidazolin-basierenden Inhibitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Lopez, D; Perez, T.: The influence of microstructure and chemical composition of carbon and low alloy steels in CO2 corrosion. A state-of-the-art appraisal, Materials & Design, 24 (2003), pp 561–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmitt, G.: Fundamental aspects in CO2 corrosion, in: Corrosion 1984, Houston, TX, US, NACE, 1984, pp 10–19Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riggs, J. R. I.: Theoretical Aspects of Corrosion Inhibitors and Inhibition, in: Nathan, C. C. (Ed.), Corrosion Inhibitors, Houston, TX, US, NACE, 1994, pp 7–27Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sastri, V. S.: Corrosion Inhibitors, Principles and Applications, 1998Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hausler, R. H.; Schmitt, G. H.; Consulta, C. H.: Hydrodynamic and Flow Effects on Corrosion Inhibition, in: Corrosion 2004, Houston, TX, US, 2004, p 04402Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lopez, D. A.; Simison, S. N.; de Sanchez, S. R.: The influence of steel microstructure on CO2 corrosion. EIS studies on the inhibition effiecency of benzimidazole, Electrochimca Acta, 48 (2003), pp 845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jiang, X.; Zeng, Y. G.; Ke, W.; Zheng, Y.; Effect of flow velocity and entrained sand on inhibition performances of two inhibitors for CO2 corrosion of N80 steel in 3 % NaCl solution, Corrosion Science, 47 (2005), pp 2636–2658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paolinelli, L.; Perez, T.; Simison, S.: The effect of pre-corrosion and steel microstructure on inhibitor performance in CO2 corrosion, Corrosion Science, 50 (2008), pp 2456–2464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heeg, B.; Klenerman, D.; Heeg, D. K. B.; Moros, T.: Persistency of Corrosion Inhibitor Films on C-steel under Multiphase Flow Conditions. Part 1: The Jet-Cylinder Arrangement, Corrosion Science, 40 (1998), pp 1303–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Akbar, A.; Hu, X.; Neville, A.; Wang, C.: The Influence of Flow Rate And Inhibitor On The Protective Layer Under Erosion-Corrosion Conditions Using Rotating Cylinder Electrode, in: Corrosion 2011, Houston, TX, US, NACE, 2011, pp 11274Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nesic, S.; Solvi, G. T.; Skjerve, S.: Rotating Cylinder vs. Loop Testing on Inhibitors for CO2 Corrosion, in: 8th European Symposium on Corrosion Inhibitors, Ferrara, Italy, 1995, pp 1135–1162Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hong, T.: Corrosion inhibitor studies in large flow loop at high temperature and high pressure, Corrosion Science, 43 (2001), pp 1839–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Altoe, P.; Pimenta, G.; Moulin, C. F.; Diaz, S. L.; Mattos, O. R.: Evaluation of oilfield corrosion inhibitors in CO2 containing media: A kinetic study, Electrochimica Acta, 41 (1996), pp 1165–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Canto, C.; Brown, B.; Nesic, S.: Integrity of Corrosion Inhibitor Films in Multiphase Flow, in: Corrosion 2011, Houston, TX, US, NACE, 2011, p 11238Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neville, A.; C. Wang, C.: Erosion–corrosion mitigation by corrosion inhibitors—An assessment of mechanisms, Wear, 267 (2009), pp 195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sun, H.; Sujatmiko, M.; Aulia, M.; J. Davis, J.; R. Hudgins, R.: Study of Corrosion and Inhibition of Carbon Steel in CO2 Containing Natural Gas at High Temperature, in: Corrosion 2011, Houston, TX, US, NACE, 2011, p 11271Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xiong, Y.; Brown, B.; Kinsella, B.; Nesic, S.; AFM Studies of the Adhesion Properties Of Surfactant Corrosion Inhibitor Films, in: Corrosion 2013, Orlando, FL, US, NACE, 2013, pp. 2521Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vogl, T.: Investigation of the erosion corrosion behavior of carbon steels at high flow rates in the presence of inhibitors, Dissertation Montanuniv. Leoben, Chair of General and Analytical Chemistry, 2012Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for General and Analytical ChemistryMontanuniversität LeobenLeobenAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Chemical Technologies and AnalyticsTechnical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations