Advertisement

A new method for prediction of air pollution based on intelligent computation

  • Samaher Al-JanabiEmail author
  • Mustafa Mohammad
  • Ali Al-Sultan
Methodologies and Application
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The detection and treatment of increasing air pollution due to technological developments represent some of the most important challenges facing the world today. Indeed, there has been a significant increase in levels of environmental pollution in recent years. The aim of the work presented herein is to design an intelligent predictor for the concentrations of air pollutants over the next 2 days based on deep learning techniques using a recurrent neural network (RNN). The best structure for its operation is then determined using a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. The new predictor based on intelligent computation relying on unsupervised learning, i.e., long short-term memory (LSTM) and optimization (i.e., PSO), is called the smart air quality prediction model (SAQPM). The main goal is to predict six the concentrations of six types of air pollution, viz. PM2.5 particulate matter, PM10, particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). SAQPM consists of four stages. The first stage involves data collection from multiple stations (35 in this case). The second stage involves preprocessing of the data, including (a) separation of each station with an independent focus, (b) handle missing values, and (c) normalization of the dataset to the range of (0, 1) using the MinMaxScalar method. The third stage relates to building the predictor based on the LSTM method by identifying the best structure and parameter values (weight, bias, number of hidden layers, number of nodes in each hidden layer, and activation function) for the network using the functional PSO algorithm to achieve a goal. Thereafter, the dataset is split into training and testing parts based on the ten cross-validation principle. The training dataset is then used to build the predictor. In the fourth stage, evaluation results for each station are obtained by reading the concentration of each pollutant each hour for at most 30 days then taking the average of the symmetric mean absolute percentage error (SMAPE) for 25 days only.

Keywords

Air pollutants Big data Prediction Analytical solution Long short-term memory Particle swarm algorithm Intelligent computation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Ali SH (2012) A novel tool (FP-KC) for handle the three main dimensions reduction and association rule mining. In: 2012 6th international conference on sciences of electronics, technologies of information and telecommunications (SETIT), Sousse, IEEE, pp 951–961.  https://doi.org/10.1109/SETIT.2012.6482042
  2. Al-Janabi S, Alkaim AF (2019) A nifty collaborative analysis to predicting a novel tool (DRFLLS) for missing values estimation. Soft Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03972-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Janabi S, Alwan E (2017) Soft mathematical system to solve black box problem through development the FARB based on hyperbolic and polynomial functions. In: 2017 10th international conference on developments in eSystems engineering (DeSE), IEEE, pp 37–42.  https://doi.org/10.1109/dese.2017.23
  4. Al-Janabi S, Mahdi MA (2019) Evaluation prediction techniques to achievement an optimal biomedical analysis. Int J Grid Util Comput 10(5):512–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Janabi S, Rawat S, Patel A, Al-Shourbaji I (2015) Design and evaluation of a hybrid system for detection and prediction of faults in electrical transformers. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 67:324–335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Janabi S, Al-Shourbaj I, Salman MA (2018) Assessing the suitability of soft computing approaches for forest fires prediction. Appl Comput Inform 14(2):214–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2017.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alkaim AF, Al-Janabi S (2020) Multi objectives optimization to gas flaring reduction from oil production. In: Farhaoui Y (ed) Big data and networks technologies. BDNT 2019. Lecture notes in networks and systems, vol 81. Springer, Cham.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23672-4_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aunan K, Hansen MH, Liu Z, Wang S (2019) The hidden hazard of household air pollution in rural China. Environ Sci Policy 93:27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2018.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basavaraju S, Gaj S, Sur A (2019) Object memorability prediction using deep learning: location and size bias. J Vis Commun Image Represent 59:117–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVCIR.2019.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bianchi FM, Maiorino E, Kampffmeyer MC et al (2017) An overview and comparative analysis of recurrent neural networks for short term load forecasting. arXiv:1705.04378
  11. Buyya R, Calheiros RN, Vahid Dastjerdi A et al (2016) Big data principles and paradigms, pp 1–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-04136-3
  12. Chien J-T, Chien J-T (2019) Deep neural network. Source Sep Mach Learn.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804566-4.00019-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Das HS, Roy P (2019) A deep dive into deep learning techniques for solving spoken language identification problems. Intell Speech Signal Process.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818130-0.00005-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghoneim OA, Doreswamy, Manjunatha BR (2017) Forecasting of ozone concentration in smart city using deep learning. In: 2017 international conference on advances in computing, communications and informatics (ICACCI 2017), IEEE, pp 1320–1326.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2017.8126024
  15. Hu M, Wang H, Wang X et al (2019) Video facial emotion recognition based on local enhanced motion history image and CNN-CTSLSTM networks. J Vis Commun Image Represent 59:176–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVCIR.2018.12.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inácio F, Macharet D, Chaimowicz L (2019) PSO-based strategy for the segregation of heterogeneous robotic swarms. J Comput Sci 31:86–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOCS.2018.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li X, Peng L, Hu Y et al (2016) Deep learning architecture for air quality predictions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:22408–22417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7812-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li X, Peng L, Yao X et al (2017) Long short-term memory neural network for air pollutant concentration predictions: method development and evaluation. J Environ Pollut 231:997–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li H, Wang J, Li R, Lu H (2019) Novel analysis–forecast system based on multi-objective optimization for air quality index. J Clean Prod 208:1365–1383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu S, Wang Y, Yang X et al (2019) Deep learning in medical ultrasound analysis: a review. Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2018.11.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matos J, Faria RPV, Nogueira IBR et al (2019) Optimization strategies for chiral separation by true moving bed chromatography using Particles Swarm Optimization (PSO) and new Parallel PSO variant. Comput Chem Eng 123:344–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/JCOMPCHEMENG.2019.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ong BT, Sugiura K, Zettsu K (2015) Dynamically pre-trained deep recurrent neural networks using environmental monitoring data for predicting PM2.5. Neural Comput Appl 27(6):1553–1566.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1955-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Popoola OAM, Carruthers D, Lad C et al (2018) Use of networks of low-cost air quality sensors to quantify air quality in urban settings. Atmos Environ 194:58–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shang Z, Deng T, He J, Duan X (2019) A novel model for hourly PM2.5 concentration prediction based on CART and EELM. J Sci Total Environ 651:3043–3052.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tebrean B, Crisan S, Muresan C, Crisan TE (2017) Low cost command and control system for automated infusion devices. In: Vlad S., Roman N. (eds) International conference on advancements of medicine and health care through technology; 12th - 15th October 2016, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52875-5_18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wen C, Liu S, Yao X, Peng L, Li X, Hu Y, Chi T (2019) A novel spatiotemporal convolutional long short-term neural network for air pollution prediction. J Sci Total Environ 654:1091–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu L, Li N, Yang Y (2018) Prediction of air quality indicators for the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. J Clean Prod 196:682–687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou B-Z, Liu X-F, Cai G-P et al (2019) Motion prediction of an uncontrolled space target. J Adv Space Res 63:496–511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASR.2018.09.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science for Women (SCIW)University of BabylonBabylonIraq

Personalised recommendations