Advertisement

Hybridized neural network and decision tree based classifier for prognostic decision making in breast cancers

  • A. SureshEmail author
  • R. Udendhran
  • M. Balamurgan
Focus
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Artificial intelligence techniques and algorithms are applied at various fields such as face recognition, self-driving cars, industrial robots and health care. These real-world conundrums are solved employing artificial intelligence since it focuses on narrow tasks, and AI-driven tasks are very reliable and efficient because of its automated problem-solving techniques. Breast cancer is considered as the most common type of cancer among women. The well-known technique for detection of breast cancer is mammography which can diagnosis anomalies and determine cancerous cells. However, in the present breast cancer screenings, the retrospective studies reveal that approximately 20–40% of breast cancer cases are missed by radiologists. The main objective of the proposed algorithm is to exactly forecast the misclassified malignant cancers employing radial basis function network and decision tree. In order to obtain the effective classification algorithm, this work is compared with three widely employed algorithms, namely K-nearest neighbors, support vector machine and Naive Bayes algorithm, and the proposed algorithm achieves a high accuracy.

Keywords

Radial basis function neural network Decision trees Breast cancer Soft computing 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Najdawi N, Biltawi M, Tedmori S (2015) Mammogram image visual enhancement, mass segmentation and classification. Appl Soft Comput 35:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Lo JY, Floyd CE Jr (1996) Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations. Radiology 198:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bursteinas B, Long J (2001) Merging distributed classifiers. In: 5th World multi conference on systemic, cybernetics and informaticsGoogle Scholar
  4. Domingos PA (2012) A few useful things to know about machine learning. Commun ACM 55(10):78–87.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2347736.2347755 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ganatra A, Panchal G, Kosta Y, Gajjar C (2011) Initial classification through back propagation in a neural network following optimization through GA to evaluate the fitness of an algorithm. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 3(1):98–116Google Scholar
  6. Gutiérrez PA, Martínez C (2012) Hybrid artificial neural networks: models, algorithms and data. In: International work-conference on artificial neural networks, pp 177–184Google Scholar
  7. Hall L, Chawla N, Bowyer K (1998) Decision tree learning on very large data sets. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, vol 3, pp 2579–2584Google Scholar
  8. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C 3(6):610–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levi F, Bosetti C, Lucchini F, Negri E La, Vecchia C (2005) Monitoring the decrease in breast cancer mortality in Europe. Eur J Cancer Prev 14(6):497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Magoulas GD, Prentza A (2010) Machine learning in medical applications. In: Paliouras G, Karkaletsis V, Spyrpoulos CD (eds) Machine learning and its applications, lecture notes in computer science, Springer, Berlin, pp 300–307Google Scholar
  11. Mahmoudabadi H, Izadi M, Menhaj MB (2009) A hybrid method for grade estimation using genetic algorithm and neural networks. Comput Geosci 13:91–101CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Mehta M, Agrawal R, Rissanen J (1996) SLIQ: a scalable parallel classifier for data mining, IBM Almaden Research Center, CA 95120Google Scholar
  13. Panchal G, Ganatra A (2012) Optimization of neural network parameter using genetic algorithm. Lambert Academic Publishing, LatviaGoogle Scholar
  14. Rampun A, Morrow PJ, Scotney BW, Winder J (2017) Fully automated breast boundary and pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms. Elsevier Artif Intell Med 79:28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sundaram M, Ramar K, Arumugam N, Prabin G (2011) Histogram modified local contrast enhancement for mammogram images. Appl Soft Comput 11(8):5809–5816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tyczynski JE, Plesko I, Aareleid T, Primic-Zakelj M, Dalmas M, Kurtinaitis J, Stengrevics A, Parkin DM (2004) EU member states: mortality declining in young women, but still increasing in the elderly. Int J Cancer 112(6):1056–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vapnik V, Vashist A (2009) A new learning paradigm: learning using privileged information. Neural Netw 22(5–6):544–557CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Verma B, Zhang P (2007) A novel—genetic algorithm to find the most significant combination of features in digital mammograms. Appl Soft Comput 7(2):612–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vimal S, Kalaivani L, Kaliappan M, Suresh A, Gao XZ, Varatharajan R (2018) Development of secured data transmission using machine learning-based discrete time partially observed Markov model and energy optimization in cognitive radio networks. Neural Comput Appl 1:1.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3788-3 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringNehru Institute of Engineering and TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringBharathidasan UniversityTrichyIndia

Personalised recommendations