Multi-criteria decision-making analysis of different non-traditional machining operations of Ti6Al4V

  • Selim Gürgen
  • Fatih Hayati Çakır
  • M. Alper SofuoğluEmail author
  • Sezan Orak
  • Melih Cemal Kuşhan
  • Huijun Li
Methodologies and Application


In the present study, different turning operations (conventional, ultrasonic-assisted and hot ultrasonic-assisted operations) of Ti6Al4V alloy were investigated by using a new multi-criteria decision-making method. In the first part of the study, conventional turning, UAT and HUAT operations were conducted, and they were compared to each other. The modal/chatter tests were performed through a hammer and recording chatter sound. Cutting velocity (10–40 m/min) and cutting tool overhang lengths (60 and 70 mm) were used as cutting parameters in the experiments. The full factorial experimental design was used. In the comparison of the turning operations, surface roughness, stable cutting depths and maximum cutting tool temperatures were considered. Also, variance analysis was carried out to optimize machining outputs. In addition, chip formation was observed. In the second part of the study, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) analysis was performed by using reference ideal method which has been recently presented in the literature to optimize machining outputs. Surface roughness, stable cutting depths and maximum cutting tool temperatures were selected as criteria to rank all the experiments. Based on MCDM results, higher cutting speeds, lower tool overhang lengths and ultrasonic-assisted turning are the appropriate levels of the cutting parameters. As a result, this study helps to understand new non-traditional machining methods in terms of MCDM perspective.


Hot machining Stable cutting depth Surface quality Ultrasonic-assisted machining Reference ideal method Multi-criteria decision making 



This work was financially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK Project #215M382).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.


  1. Abualigah LMQ (2019) Feature selection and enhanced krill herd algorithm for text document clustering. In: J Kacprzyk (series ed) Studies in computational intelligence. ISBN: 978-3-030-10674-4Google Scholar
  2. Abualigah LM, Khader AT (2017) Unsupervised text feature selection technique based on hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm with genetic operators for the text clustering. J Supercomput 73(11):4773–4795Google Scholar
  3. Abualigah LM, Khader AT, Hanandeh ES (2018a) Hybrid clustering analysis using improved krill herd algorithm. Appl Intell 48(11):4047–4071Google Scholar
  4. Abualigah LM, Khader AT, Hanandeh ES (2018b) A combination of objective functions and hybrid krill herd algorithm for text document clustering analysis. Eng Appl Artif Intell 73:111–125Google Scholar
  5. Al Janabi S, Al-Shourbaji I (2016) A study of cyber security awareness in educational environment in the middle east. J Inf Knowl Manag 15(1):1–30Google Scholar
  6. Al-Janabi S (2017) Pragmatic miner to risk analysis for intrusion detection (PMRA-ID). In: Mohamed A, Berry M, Yap B (eds) Soft computing in data science. SCDS 2017 communications in computer and information science, vol 788. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Janabi S (2018) Smart system to create optimal higher education environment using IDA and IOTs. Int J Comput Appl 40:1–16. Google Scholar
  8. Al-Janabi S, Mahdi MA (2019) Evaluation prediction techniques to achievement an optimal biomedical analysis. Int J Grid Util ComputGoogle Scholar
  9. Al-Janabi S, Salman MA, Fanfakh A (2018) Recommendation system to improve time management for people in education environments. J Eng Appl Sci 13:10182–11019Google Scholar
  10. Al-Janabi S, Salman MA, Mohammad M (2019) Multi-level network construction based on intelligent big data analysis. In: Farhaoui Y, Moussaid L (eds) ICBDSDE 2018, SBD, vol 53. Springer, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  11. Amini S, Teimouri R (2016) Parametric study and multicharacteristic optimization of rotary turning process assisted by longitudinal ultrasonic vibration. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 231(5):978–991Google Scholar
  12. Amini S, Hosseinabadi HN, Sajjady SA (2016) Experimental study on effect of micro textured surfaces generated by ultrasonic vibration assisted face turning on friction and wear performance. Appl Surf Sci 390:633–648Google Scholar
  13. Babitsky V, Kalashnikov A, Meadows A, Wijesundara AAH (2003) Ultrasonically assisted turning of aviation materials. J Mater Process Technol 132(1–3):157–167Google Scholar
  14. Babitsky V, Mitrofanov A, Silberschmidt VV (2004) Ultrasonically assisted turning of aviation materials: simulations and experimental study. Ultrasonics 42(1–9):81–86Google Scholar
  15. Bai W, Sun R, Leopold J (2016) Numerical modelling of microstructure evolution in Ti6Al4V alloy by ultrasonic assisted cutting. Procedia CIRP 46:428–431Google Scholar
  16. Boral S, Chakraborty S (2016) A case-based reasoning approach for non-traditional machining processes selection. Adv Product Eng Manag 11(4):311–323Google Scholar
  17. Brehl DE, Dow TA (2008) Review of vibration-assisted machining. Precis Eng 32(3):153–172Google Scholar
  18. Cables E, Lamata MT, Verdegay JL (2016) RIM-reference ideal method in multicriteria decision making. Inf Sci 337:1–10Google Scholar
  19. Cheung CF, Lee WB (2000) Modelling and simulation of surface topography in ultra-precision diamond turning. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 214(6):463–480Google Scholar
  20. da Silva RB, Machado ÁR, Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Sales WF (2013) Tool life and wear mechanisms in high speed machining of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy with PCD tools under various coolant pressures. J Mater Process Technol 213(8):1459–1464Google Scholar
  21. Davim JP (ed) (2010) Surface integrity in machining. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Farahnakian M, Razfar MR (2014) Experimental study on hybrid ultrasonic and plasma aided turning of hardened steel AISI 4140. Mater Manuf Process 29(5):550–556Google Scholar
  23. Guo P, Ehmann KF (2013) Development of a tertiary motion generator for elliptical vibration texturing. Precis Eng 37(2):364–371Google Scholar
  24. Hessainia Z, Belbah A, Yallese MA, Mabrouki T, Rigal J-F (2013) On the prediction of surface roughness in the hard turning based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations. Measurement 46(5):1671–1681Google Scholar
  25. Jiao F, Niu Y, Liu X (2015) Effect of ultrasonic vibration on surface white layer in ultrasonic aided turning of hardened GCr15 bearing steel. Mater Res Innov 19(Suppl 8):S8-938–S8-942Google Scholar
  26. Khandekar AV, Chakraborty S (2016) Application of fuzzy axiomatic design principles for selection of non-traditional machining processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(1–4):529–543Google Scholar
  27. Kim D-S, Chang I-C, Kim S-W (2002) Microscopic topographical analysis of tool vibration effects on diamond turned optical surfaces. Precis Eng 26(2):168–174Google Scholar
  28. Madić M, Petkovic D, Radovanovic M (2015a) Selection of nonconventional machining processes using the OCRA method. Serbian J Manag 10(1):61–73Google Scholar
  29. Madić M, Radovanović M, Petković D (2015b) Non-conventional machining processes selection using multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis method. J Eng Sci Technol 10(11):1441–1452Google Scholar
  30. Mitrofanov AV, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2003) Finite element simulations of ultrasonically assisted turning. Comput Mater Sci 28(3–4):645–653Google Scholar
  31. Mitrofanov AV, Ahmed N, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2005) Effect of lubrication and cutting parameters on ultrasonically assisted turning of Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:649–654Google Scholar
  32. Muhammad R (2013) Hot ultrasonically assisted turning of Ti-15V3Al3Cr3Sn: experimental and numerical analysis. Doctoral thesis, Loughborough University, UKGoogle Scholar
  33. Muhammad R, Maurotto A, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2011) Analysis of forces in vibro-impact and hot vibro-impact turning of advanced alloys. Appl Mech Mater 70:315–320Google Scholar
  34. Muhammad R, Maurotto A, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2012a) Hot ultrasonically assisted turning of β-Ti alloy. Procedia CIRP 1:336–341Google Scholar
  35. Muhammad R, Ahmed N, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2012b) Numerical modelling of vibration-assisted turning of Ti-15333. Procedia CIRP 1:347–352Google Scholar
  36. Muhammad R, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2013) Finite element modelling of conventional and hybrid oblique turning processes of titanium alloy. Procedia CIRP 8:510–515Google Scholar
  37. Muhammad R, Hussain MS, Maurotto A, Siemers C, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2014) Analysis of a free machining α + β titanium alloy using conventional and ultrasonically assisted turning. J Mater Process Technol 214(4):906–915Google Scholar
  38. Nabhani F (2001) Machining of aerospace titanium alloys. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 17(1–2):99–106Google Scholar
  39. Nath C, Rahman M (2008) Effect of machining parameters in ultrasonic vibration cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(9):965–974Google Scholar
  40. Nath C, Rahman M, Andrew SSK (2007) A study on ultrasonic vibration cutting of low alloy steel. J Mater Process Technol 192–193:159–165Google Scholar
  41. Neşeli S (2013) Analytical investigation of effect of process damping on chatter vibrations and optimization cutting parameters depending on stable depth of cut and process damping values in turning. Doctoral thesis, Selçuk University, Konya, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  42. Niknam SA, Khettabi R, Songmene V (2014) Machinability and machining of titanium alloys: a review. In: Davim JP (ed) Machining of titanium alloys. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–30Google Scholar
  43. Patil S, Joshi S, Tewari A, Joshi SS (2014) Modelling and simulation of effect of ultrasonic vibrations on machining of Ti6Al4V. Ultrasonics 54(2):694–705Google Scholar
  44. Razavi H, Mirbagheri M (2016) Design and fabrication of a novel vibrational system for ultrasonic assisted oblique turning process. J Mech Sci Technol 30(2):827–835Google Scholar
  45. Roy MK, Ray A, Pradhan BB (2017) Non-traditional machining process selection-an integrated approach. Int J Qual Res 11(1):71–94Google Scholar
  46. Sajjady SA, Nouri Hossein Abadi H, Amini S, Nosouhi R (2016) Analytical and experimental study of topography of surface texture in ultrasonic vibration assisted turning. Mater Des 93:311–323Google Scholar
  47. Shamoto E, Moriwaki T (1994) Study on elliptical vibration cutting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 43(1):35–38Google Scholar
  48. Shamoto E, Suzuki N, Hino R (2008) Analysis of 3D elliptical vibration cutting with thin shear plane model. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):57–60Google Scholar
  49. Sharma VS, Dogra M, Suri NM (2008) Advances in the turning process for productivity improvement—a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 222(11):1417–1442Google Scholar
  50. Silberschmidt VV, Mahdy SMA, Gouda MA, Naseer A, Maurotto A, Roy A (2014) Surface-roughness improvement in ultrasonically assisted turning. Procedia CIRP 13:49–54Google Scholar
  51. Singh P, Pungotra H, Kalsi NS (2016) On the complexities in machining titanium alloys. In: Mandal DK, Syan CS (eds) CAD/CAM, robotics and factories of the future. Springer, New Delhi, pp 499–507Google Scholar
  52. Tabatabaei SMK, Behbahani S, Mirian SM (2013) Analysis of ultrasonic assisted machining (UAM) on regenerative chatter in turning. J Mater Process Technol 213(3):418–425Google Scholar
  53. Türkeş E (2007) Theoretical and experimental analysis of process damping in machine tool chatter vibration. Doctoral thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang K, Wang H, Liu M, Xing X, Han T (2018) Survey on person re-identification based on deep learning. CAAI Trans Intell Technol 3(4):219–227Google Scholar
  55. Zhang X, Senthil Kumar A, Rahman M, Nath C, Liu K (2012) An analytical force model for orthogonal elliptical vibration cutting technique. J Manuf Process 14(3):378–387Google Scholar
  56. Zhang X, Kumar AS, Rahman M, Liu K (2013) Modeling of the effect of tool edge radius on surface generation in elliptical vibration cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1–4):35–42Google Scholar
  57. Zhang C, Ehmann K, Li Y (2015) Analysis of cutting forces in the ultrasonic elliptical vibration-assisted micro-groove turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(1–4):139–152Google Scholar
  58. Zhang C, Guo P, Ehmann KF, Li Y (2016) Effects of ultrasonic vibrations in micro-groove turning. Ultrasonics 67:30–40Google Scholar
  59. Zou P, Xu Y, He Y, Chen M, Wu H (2015) Experimental investigation of ultrasonic vibration assisted turning of 304 austenitic stainless steel. Shock Vib 2015:1–19Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eskişehir Vocational SchoolEskişehir Osmangazi UniversityEskisehirTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, School of Mechanical, Materials and Mechatronic EngineeringUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringEskişehir Osmangazi UniversityEskisehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations