Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 23, Issue 24, pp 13449–13458 | Cite as

Generalised grey target decision method for mixed attributes based on the improved Gini–Simpson index

  • Jinshan MaEmail author
Methodologies and Application

Abstract

A new generalised grey target decision method for mixed attributes is presented. The proposed method makes a modification to the Gini–Simpson (G–S) index and adopts it as the basis of decision making. The improved version of G–S index could represent the difference (gap) between an alternative and its target centre as a whole and reflect the difference in various alternative indices and the similarity between alternative indices and target centre indices in detail. And the G–S index also has the advantage of combining the alternative index and target centre index in a simple and effective form. Besides, ranking alternatives easily or not by a given decision-making method is investigated, which arrives at the discrimination ability index. In decision making, the proposed method first transforms all mixed attribute indices into binary connection numbers and divides them into the deterministic terms and uncertain terms to constitute two-tuple (determinacy, uncertainty) numbers. Then the target centre indices of two-tuple (determinacy, uncertainty) number are determined. Following this, the improved comprehensive weighted Gini–Simpson index (CWGSI) of all alternatives can be obtained. Finally, the alternatives can be sorted with the CWGSI: the smaller the better. A case study exemplifies the proposed approach.

Keywords

Generalised grey target decision method Mixed attributes Gini–Simpson index Binary connection number Two-tuple (determinacy, uncertainty) number 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to express his sincere thanks to the editor and the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving the quality of this paper.

Funding

This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (Grant No. SKJZD2019-05).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Al Janabi S (2018) Smart system to create an optimal higher education environment using IDA and IOTs. Int J Comput Appl 1–16Google Scholar
  2. Al Janabi S, Al Shourbaji I, Salman MA (2018) Assessing the suitability of soft computing approaches for forest fires prediction. Appl Comput Inform 14(2):214–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali SH (2013) A novel tool (FP-KC) for handle the three main dimensions reduction and association rule mining. In: International conference on sciences of electronicsGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Janabi S (2017) Pragmatic miner to risk analysis for intrusion detection (PMRA-ID), 263–277Google Scholar
  5. Al-Janabi S, Alwan E (2017) Soft mathematical system to solve black box problem through development the FARB based on hyperbolic and polynomial functions. In: 2017 10th International conference on developments in eSystems engineering (DeSE), 37-42Google Scholar
  6. Casquilho JP (2016) A methodology to determine the maximum value of weighted Gini–Simpson index. Casquilho SpringerPlus 5(1):1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dang YG, Liu GF, Wang JP, Liu B (2004) Multi-attribute decision model of grey target considering weights. Stat Decis 3:29–30Google Scholar
  8. Deng JL (2002) Grey system theory. Huangzhong University of Science and Technology Press, WuhanGoogle Scholar
  9. Deng W, Chen R, He B, Liu Y, Yin L, Guo J (2012) A novel two-stage hybrid swarm intelligence optimization algorithm and application. Soft Comput 16(10):1707–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng W, Zhao H, Liu J, Yan X, Li Y, Yin L, Ding C (2015) An improved CACO algorithm based on adaptive method and multi-variant strategies. Soft Comput 19(3):701–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deng W, Yao R, Zhao H, Yang X, Li G (2017) A novel intelligent diagnosis method using optimal LS-SVM with improved PSO algorithm. Soft ComputingGoogle Scholar
  12. Deng W, Zhao H, Yang X, Xiong J, Sun M, Li B (2017b) Study on an improved adaptive PSO algorithm for solving multi-objective gate assignment. Appl Soft Comput 59:288–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deng W, Zhao H, Zou L, Li G, Yang X, Wu D (2017c) A novel collaborative optimization algorithm in solving complex optimization problems. Soft Comput 21(15):4387–4398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deng W, Zhang S, Zhao H, Yang X (2018) A novel fault diagnosis method based on integrating empirical wavelet transform and fuzzy entropy for motor bearing. IEEE Access 6:35042–35056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eliazar I, Sokolov IM (2010) Maximization of statistical heterogeneity: from Shannon’s entropy to Gini’s index. Physica A 389(16):3023–3038MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fabrizi E, Trivisano C (2016) Small area estimation of the Gini concentration coefficient. Comput Stat Data Anal 99:223–234MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregori J, Perales C, Rodriguez-Frias F, Esteban JI, Quer J, Domingo E (2016) Viral quasispecies complexity measures. Virology 493:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guan X, Sun G, Yi X, Guo Q (2015) Hybrid multiple attribute recognition based on coefficient of incidence bull’s-eye-distance. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sinica 36(7):2431–2443Google Scholar
  19. Guiasu RC, Guiasu S (2012) The weighted Gini–Simpson index: revitalizing an old index of biodiversity. Int J Ecol 2012:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang J, Shang P, Zhang Z, Li X (2017) Permutation entropy analysis based on Gini–Simpson index for financial time series. Physica A 486:273–283MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luo D, Wang X (2012) The multi-attribute grey target decision method for attribute value within three-parameter interval grey number. Appl Math Model 36(5):1957–1963MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma J (2014) Grey target decision method for a variable target centre based on the decision maker’s preferences. J Appl Math 2014:1–6Google Scholar
  23. Ma J (2018a) Generalised grey target decision method for mixed attributes with index weights containing uncertain numbers. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 34(1):625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma J (2018b) Generalized grey target decision method for mixed attributes based on Kullback–Leibler distance. Entropy 20(7):523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma J, Ji C (2014) Generalized grey target decision method for mixed attributes based on connection number. J Appl Math 2014:1–8Google Scholar
  26. Ma J, Ji C, Sun J (2014) Fuzzy similar priority method for mixed attributes. J Appl Math 2014:1–7Google Scholar
  27. Parsa M, Di Crescenzo A, Jabbari H (2018) Analysis of reliability systems via Gini-type index. Eur J Oper Res 264(1):340–353MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pesenti N, Quatto P, Ripamonti E (2017) Bootstrap confidence intervals for biodiversity measures based on Gini index and entropy. Qual Quant 51(2):847–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petry F, Elmore P, Yager R (2015) Combining uncertain information of differing modalities. Inf Sci 322:237–256MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shen CG, Dang YG, Pei LL (2010) Hybrid multi-attribute decision model of grey target. Stat Decis 12:17–20Google Scholar
  31. Song J, Dang YG, Li XM, Wang ZX (2009) Grey risk group decision based on the majorant operator of “rewarding good and punishing bad”. J Grey Syst 21(4):377–386Google Scholar
  32. Wang ZX, Dang YG, Yang H (2009) Improvements on decision method of grey target. Syst Eng Electron 31(11):2634–2636zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Zeng B, Liu SF, Li C, Chen JM (2013) Grey target decision-making model of interval grey number based on cobweb area. Syst Eng Electron 35(11):2329–2334zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao KQ (2008) The theoretical basis and basic algorithm of binary connection A +Bi and its application in AI. CAAI Trans Intell Syst 3(6):476–486Google Scholar
  35. Zhao KQ (2010) Decision making algorithm based on set par analysis for use when facing multiple uncertain in attributes. CAAI Trans Intell Syst 5(1):41–50MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Energy Science and EngineeringHenan Polytechnic UniversityJiaozuoChina

Personalised recommendations