Application of a fuzzy unit hypercube in cardiovascular risk classification
- 34 Downloads
Most standard cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment models are based on traditional quantitative approaches. Such models oversimplify complex interactions emanating from the imprecise nature of CVD risk factors. As such, approaches that can handle uncertainty due to imprecision need to be explored. This study proposes a cardiovascular risk classification model based on the geometry of fuzzy sets, which allows for a multidimensional display of qualitative properties associated with risk attributes—that are defined in a fuzzy sense. Within this structure, a risk concept (which defines the degree of risk severity) is simply a continuum of points of the hypercube. Consequently, an individual’s risk status would naturally be represented by an ordered fuzzy within the continuum. This representation forms an excellent comparative framework through measures of similarity where an individual’s relative position in the continuum can be given as degrees of compatibility with the underlying risk concepts.
KeywordsFuzzy hypercube Similarity measure Risk continuum
This work was supported by the Pan African University, Institute of Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation under the Commission of the African Union.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- Anooj P (2012) Clinical decision support system: risk level prediction of heart disease using weighted fuzzy rules. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci 24(1):27–40Google Scholar
- Buede DM (1994) Examination of the fuzzy subsethood theorem for data fusion. In: Multisensor fusion and integration for intelligent systems, 1994. IEEE international conference on MFI’94, IEEE, pp 430–434Google Scholar
- Helgason CM, Watkins FA, Jobe TH (2002) Measurable differences between sequential and parallel diagnostic decision processes for determining stroke subtype: a representation of interacting pathologies. Thromb Haemost 88(02):210–212Google Scholar
- Kahtan H, Zamli KZ, Fatthi WNAWA, Abdullah A, Abdulleteef M, Kamarulzaman NS (2018) Heart disease diagnosis system using fuzzy logic. In: Proceedings of the 2018 7th international conference on software and computer applications, ACM, pp 297–301Google Scholar
- Kasbe T, Pippal RS (2017) Design of heart disease diagnosis system using fuzzy logic. In: 2017 international conference on energy, communication, data analytics and soft computing (ICECDS), IEEE, pp 3183–3187Google Scholar
- Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, Das SR, de Ferranti S, Després JP, Fullerton HJ et al (2015) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation 133(4):e38–e360. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350 Google Scholar
- O’Donnell CJ, Elosua R (2008) Cardiovascular risk factors. Insights from framingham heart study. Revista Espanola de Cardiologia (English Edition) 61(3):299–310Google Scholar
- O’gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE, Chung MK, De Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA et al (2013) 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of st-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(4):485–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rajeswari K, Vaithiyanathan V (2011) Heart disease diagnosis: an efficient decision support system based on fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm. Int J Decis Sci Risk Manag 3(1–2):81–97Google Scholar
- Ross TJ (2009) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D, Group MRFITR et al (1993) Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Diabetes Care 16(2):434–444Google Scholar
- Ventola CL (2014) Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. Pharm Ther 39(5):356Google Scholar
- Vijaya K, Khanna Nehemiah H, Kannan A, Bhuvaneswari N (2010) Fuzzy neuro genetic approach for predicting the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Int J Data Min Model Manag 2(4):388–402Google Scholar
- Zahan S, Bogdan R, Capalneanu R (2000) Fuzzy expert system for cardiovascular disease diagnosis-tests and performance evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 5th seminar on neural network applications in electrical engineering, 2000. NEUREL 2000. IEEE, pp 65–68Google Scholar
- Zhao J, Bose BK (2002) Evaluation of membership functions for fuzzy logic controlled induction motor drive. In: IECON 02 IEEE 2002 28th annual conference of the industrial electronics society, IEEE, vol 1, pp 229–234Google Scholar
- Zhiqiang G, Lingsong H, Hang T, Cong L (2015) A cloud computing based mobile healthcare service system. In: 2015 IEEE 3rd international conference on smart instrumentation, measurement and applications (ICSIMA), IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- Zimmermann HJ (2011) Fuzzy set theory—and its applications. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar