Advertisement

River flow prediction using hybrid PSOGSA algorithm based on feed-forward neural network

  • Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram
  • Mohmmmad Ali Ghorbani
  • Shahaboddin ShamshirbandEmail author
  • Vahid Karimi
  • Chandrashekhar Meshram
Methodologies and Application
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

River flow modeling plays an important role in water resources management. This research aims at developing a hybrid model that integrates the feed-forward neural network (FNN) with a hybrid algorithm of the particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithms (PSOGSA) to predict river flow. Fundamentally, as the precision of a FNN model is essentially dependent upon the assurance of its model parameters, this review utilizes the PSOGSA for ideal preparing of the FNN model and gives the likelihood of boosting the execution of FNN. For this purpose, monthly river flow time series from 1990 to 2016 for Garber station of the Turkey River located at Clayton County, Iowa, were used. The proposed FNN-PSOGSA was applied in monthly river flow data. The results indicate that the FNN-PSOGSA model improves the forecasting accuracy and is a feasible method in predicting the river flow.

Keywords

Feed-forward neural networks Gravitational search algorithm Hybrid model Particle swarm optimization River flow forecasting Turkey River 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Achela D, Fernando K (1998) Runoff forecasting using RBF networks with OLS algorithm. J Hydrol Eng 3(3):203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adhikari R (2015) A neural network based linear ensemble framework form time series forecasting. Neurocomputing 157:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alweshah M (2014) Firefly algorithm with artificial neural network for time series problems. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 7(19):3978–3982Google Scholar
  4. ASCE Task Committee on the Application of ANNs in Hydrology (2000) Artificial neural networks in hydrology, II: hydrologic application. J Hydrol Eng 5(2):124–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Awchi TA (2014) River discharges forecasting in Northern Iraq using different ANN techniques. Water Resour Manag 28:801–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blum C, Socha K (2005) Training feed-forward neural networks with ant colony optimization: an application to pattern classification. In: IEEE fifth international conference on hybrid intelligent systems (HIS’05), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 233–238Google Scholar
  7. Bozorg-Haddad O, Janbaz M, Loáiciga HA (2016) Application of the gravity search algorithm to multi-reservoir operation optimization. Adv Water Resour 98:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brauer KH (2015) A hydrologic model of Upper Roberts Creek and exploration of the potential impacts of conservation practices. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA, p 138. Retrieved from http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1953/
  9. Brown ME, Lary DJ, Vrieling A, Stathakis D, Mussa H (2008) Neural networks as a tool for constructing continuous NDVI time series from AVHRR and MODIS. Int J Remote Sens 29(24):7141–7158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burney SMA, Jilani TA, Ardil C (2005) Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm for karachi stock exchange share rates forecasting. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 3:171–176Google Scholar
  11. Carvalho JP, Camelo FV (2015) One day ahead stream flow forecasting. In: 16th world congress of the international fuzzy systems association (IFSA) and the 9th conference of the European Society for fuzzy logic and technology (EUSFLAT), Gijon, Asturias (Spain), pp 1168–1175Google Scholar
  12. Cells M, Rylander B (2002) Neural network learning using particle swarm optimization. Adv Inf Sci Soft Comput 2002:224–226Google Scholar
  13. Ch S, Anand N, Panigrahi BK, Mathur S (2013) Streamflow forecasting by SVM with quantum behaved particle swarm optimization. Neurocomputing 101:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chai T, Draxler RR (2014) Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?–Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci Model Dev 7(3):1247–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Computat 6(1):58–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dawson CW, Abrahart RJ, See LM (2007) HydroTest: a web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts. Environ Model Softw 22(7):1034–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deo RC, Şahin M (2016) An extreme learning machine model for the simulation of monthly mean streamflow water level in eastern Queensland. Environ Monit Assess 188:90Google Scholar
  18. Delafrouz H, Ghaheri A, Ghorbani MA (2017) A novel hybrid neural network based on phase space reconstruction technique for daily river flow prediction. Soft Comput 2017:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2480-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: IEEE 6th international symposium in micro machine and human science, Nagoya, Japan, pp 39–43Google Scholar
  20. Engel J (1988) Teaching feed-forward neural networks by simulated annealing. Complex Syst 2:641–648MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Gairaa K, Khellaf A, Messlem Y, Chellali F (2016) Estimation of the daily global solar radiation based on Box-Jenkins and ANN models: a combined approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:238–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghorbani MA, Zadeh HA, Isazadeh M, Terzi O (2016a) A comparative study of artificial neural network (MLP, RBF) and support vector machine models for river flow prediction. Environ Earth Sci 75:476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghorbani MA, Khatibi R, Goel A, Fazelifard MH, Azani A (2016b) Modeling river discharge time series using support vector machine and artificial neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 75:685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goyal MK, Bharti B, Quilty J, Adamowski J, Pandey A (2014) Modeling of daily pan evaporation in sub-tropical climates using ANN, LS-SVR, fuzzy logic, and ANFIS. Expert Syst Appl 41:5267–5276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heo KY, Ha KJ, Yun KS, Lee SS, Kim HJ, Wang B (2014) Methods for uncertainty assessment of climate models and model predictions over East Asia. Int J Climatol 34:377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Husken M, Stagge P (2003) Recurrent neural networks for time series classification. Neurocomputing 50:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jain A, Kumar AM (2007) Hybrid neural network models for hydrologic time series forecasting. Appl Soft Comput 7(2):585–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jiang S, Zhicheng J, Wang Y (2015) A novel gravitational acceleration enhanced particle swarm optimization algorithm for wind-thermal economic emission dispatch problem considering wind power availability. Electr Power Energy Syst 73:1035–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalteh AM (2013) Monthly river flow forecasting using artificial neural network and support vector regression models coupled with wavelet transform. Comput Geosci 54:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kang F, Xu Q, Li J (2016) Slope reliability analysis using surrogate models via new support vector machines with swarm intelligence. Appl Math Model 40(11–12):6105–6120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.01.050 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kang F, Li J, Xu Q (2017a) System reliability analysis of slopes using multilayer perceptron and radial basis function networks. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 41(18):1962–1978.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kang F, Liu J, Li J, Li S (2017b) Concrete dam deformation prediction model for health monitoring based on extreme learning machine. Struct Control Health Monit 24(10):e1997.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kashani MH, Daneshfaraz R, Ghorbani MA, Najafi MR, Kisi O (2015) Comparison of different methods for developing a stage–discharge curve of the Kizilirmak River. J Flood Risk Manag 8:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kayarvizhy N, Kanmani S, Uthariaraj RV (2014) ANN models optimized using swarm intelligence algorithms. WSEAS Trans Comput 13:501–519Google Scholar
  35. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks, Preth, WA, Australia. vol 4, pp 1942–1948Google Scholar
  36. Kisi O, Cimen M (2011) A wavelet-support vector machine conjunction model for monthly streamflow forecasting. J Hydrol 399(1–2):132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kisi O, Alizamir M, Zounemat-Kermani M (2017) Modeling groundwater fluctuations by three different evolutionary neural network techniques using hydroclimatic data. Nat Hazards 87(1):267–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krause P, Boyle D, Bäse F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci 5(5):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuok KK, Harun S, Shamsuddin SM (2009) Particle swarm optimization feedforward neural network for hourly rainfall-runoff modeling in Bedup Basin, Malaysia. Int J Civ Environ Eng 9(10):20–39Google Scholar
  40. Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35(1):233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environ Model Softw 15(1):101–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mirjalili SA, Hashim SZM, Sardroudi HM (2012) Training feedforward neural networks using hybrid particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm. Appl Math Comput 218:11125–11137MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Montana DJ, Davis L (1989) Training feedforward neural networks using genetic algorithms. In: 11th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Detroit, MI, USA. vol 1, pp 762–767Google Scholar
  44. Nash J, Sutcliffe J (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nayak PC, Sudheer KP, Rangan DM, Ramasastri KS (2004) A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series. J Hydrol 291(1–2):52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ojugo AA, Emudianughe J, Yoro RE, Okonta EO, Eboka AO (2013) A hybrid artificial neural network gravitational search algorithm for rainfall runoffs modeling and simulation in hydrology. Prog Intell Comput Appl 2(1):22–33Google Scholar
  47. Rajaee T, Mirbagheri SA, Kermani MZ, Nourani V (2009) Daily suspended sediment concentration simulation using ANN and neuro-fuzzy models. Sci Total Environ 407:4916–4927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rashedi E, Nezamabadi-pour H, Saryazdi S (2009) GSA: a gravitational search algorithm. Inf Sci 179(13):2232–2248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Settles M, Rodebaugh B, Soule T (2003) Comparison of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimizer when evolving a recurrent neural network. In: Cantú-Paz E et al (eds) Genetic and evolutionary computation—GECCO 2003. Lecture Notes in computer science, vol 2723. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 148–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res 106(7):7183–7192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang WC, Chau KW, Cheng CT, Qiu L (2009) A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. J Hydrol 374(3–4):294–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Willmott CJ, Robeson SM, Matsuura K (2012) A refined index of model performance. Int J Climatol 32(13):2088–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang JR, Zhang J, Lok TM, Lyu MR (2007) A hybrid particle swarm optimization–back-propagation algorithm for feedforward neural network training. Appl Math Comput 185(2):1026–1037zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram
    • 1
  • Mohmmmad Ali Ghorbani
    • 2
    • 3
  • Shahaboddin Shamshirband
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  • Vahid Karimi
    • 2
  • Chandrashekhar Meshram
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceRani Durgawati UniversityJabalpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran
  3. 3.Engineering FacultyNear East UniversityNicosia, Mersin 10Turkey
  4. 4.Department for Management of Science and Technology DevelopmentTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  5. 5.Faculty of Information TechnologyTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations