Reciprocal fuzzy preference relation (FPR) is a hot topic in the research field of group decision making (GDM). Within the framework of GDM, a two-stage consensus reaching model is proposed to modify the decision makers’ (DMs’) FPRs. In the first stage which is called consistency improving stage, a consistency index and an iterative algorithm are employed to measure and improve individual consistency, respectively. In each iteration of the algorithm, only one pair of preference values, which deviates the most from the corresponding elements in the consistent FPR matrix, are modified to keep the DM’s original information as much as possible. In the second stage which is called consensus reaching stage, individual consensus index and group consensus index are applied to measure consensus. A convex quadratic programming model is developed to help DMs reach consensus. Some desired properties of the model are also investigated and testified. What’s more, the final individual consistency is also limited to an acceptable threshold. Finally, a practical example is used to illustrate the validity of the proposed consensus model.
GDM Reciprocal fuzzy preference relation Individual consistency Consensus model
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors are very grateful to associate editor and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions that have helped to improve the quality of this paper. This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grants (No. 71471056), Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2010) A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences. Inf Sci 180:4477–4495MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrerizo FJ, Moreno JM, Pérez IJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2010) Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks. Soft Comput 14:451–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Pedrycz W (2013) A method based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts. Eur J Oper Res 230:624–633MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Cabrerizo FJ, Ureña R, Pedrycz W, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) Building consensus in group decision making with an allocation of information granularity. Fuzzy Sets Syst 255:115–127MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Cabrerizo FJ, Al-Hmouz R, Morfeq A, Balamash AS, Martínez M, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Soft consensus measures in group decision making using unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Soft Comput 21:3037–3050CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Cabrerizo FJ, Morente-Molinera JA, Pedrycz W, Taghavi A, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Granulating linguistic information in decision making under consensus and consistency. Expert Syst Appl 99:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 182:383–399CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Chiclana F, García JM, Moral MJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2013) A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Inf Sci 221:110–123MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Moral MJ, Chiclana F, Tapia JM, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) A comparative study on consensus measures in group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33:1624–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY, Feng B (2010a) The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes. Eur J Oper Res 203:455–463CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Dong YC, Zhang GQ, Hong WC, Xu JP (2010b) Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decis Support Syst 49:281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996a) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:73–87MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996b) A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 88:31–49CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32:394–402CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:644–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2007) A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy Preference Relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:863–877CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Liu WQ, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Group decision-making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 16:429–447MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu J, Chiclana F (2014) Visual information feedback mechanism and attitudinal prioritisation method for group decision making with triangular fuzzy complementary preference relations. Inf Sci 279:716–734MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A concise consensus support model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations based on deviation measures. Fuzzy Sets Syst 206:58–73MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Xu YJ, Chen L, Rodríguez RM, Herrera F, Wang HM (2016) Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 99:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu YJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) A consensus model for hesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in water allocation management. Appl Soft Comput 58:265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu YJ, Liu X, Wang HM (2018a) The additive consistency measure of fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9:1141–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu YJ, Wang QQ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2018b) Methods to improve the ordinal and multiplicative consistency for reciprocal preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 67:479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang BW, Dong YC, Xu JP (2014) Multiple attribute consensus rules with minimum adjustments to support consensus reaching. Knowl Based Syst 67:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Consensus building for the heterogeneous large-scale GDM with the individual concerns and satisfactions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:884–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar