Advertisement

Transformations between the center of gravity and the possibilistic mean for triangular and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers

  • Pasi Luukka
  • Jan Stoklasa
  • Mikael Collan
Foundations

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the concept of center of gravity and its relationship to the concept of possibilistic mean. We propose new transformations between the center of gravity and the possibilistic mean for triangular and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers.

Keywords

Center of gravity Fuzzy number Possibilistic mean Transformation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper was partially supported by the Grant IGA_FF_2017_011 of the internal grant agency of Palacký University Olomouc.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Alexandrini P (340) Mathematicae CollectionesGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlsson C, Fuller R (2001) On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 122(2):315–326MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Collan M, Fullér R, Mezei J (2009) A fuzzy pay-off method for real option valuation. J Appl Math Decis Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/238196 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Delgado M, Moral S (1987) On the concept of possibility-probability consistency. Fuzzy Sets Syst 21(3):311–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(87)90132-1 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Possibility theory: an approach to computerized processing of uncertainty. Plenum Press, New York, p 139.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1800-9139 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubois D, Prade H (1993) Fuzzy sets and probability: misunderstandings, bridges and gaps. In: Proceedings of the second IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, San Francisco, pp 1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1993.327367
  7. Dubois D, Prade H (2015) The legacy of 50 years of fuzzy sets: a discussion. Fuzzy Sets Syst 281:21–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2015.09.004 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubois D, Prade H (2016) Practical methods for constructing possibility distributions. Int J Intell Syst 31(3):215–239.  https://doi.org/10.1002/int CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubois D, Foulloy L, Mauris G, Prade H (2004) Probability-possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities. Relib Comput 10(4):273–297.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REOM.0000032115.22510.b5 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Klir GJ, Harmanec D (1994) On modal logic interpretation of possibility theory. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 2(2):237–245MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Klir GJ, Parviz B (1992) Probability-possibility transformations: a comparison. Int J Gen Syst 21(3):291–310.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079208945083 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Klir GJ, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and aplications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Link S, Prade H (2016) Possibilistic functional dependencies and their relationship to possibility theory. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 24(3):757–763.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2015.2466074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pota M, Esposito M, De Pietro G (2014) Fuzzy partitioning for clinical DSSs using statistical information transformed into possibility-based knowledge. Knowl Based Syst 67(1):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ruspini EH (1991) On the semantics of fuzzy logic. Int J Approx Reason 5(1):45–88.  https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20034 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Schafer G (1987) Belief functions and possibility measures. In: Bezdek JC (ed) Analysis of fuzzy information, vol 1, mathematic edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 51–84Google Scholar
  17. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):3–28MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Zadeh LA (2014) A note on similarity-based definitions of possibility and probability. Inf Sci 267:334–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.046 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and ManagementLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland
  2. 2.Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of ArtsPalacký UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations