Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 22, pp 7339–7353 | Cite as

Input–output performance efficiency measurement of an electricity distribution utility using super-efficiency data envelopment analysis

  • Miriam F. Bongo
  • Lanndon A. Ocampo
  • Yannie Ann D. Magallano
  • Geraldine A. Manaban
  • Ezra Kim F. Ramos
Focus

Abstract

This paper applies the conventional DEA model and super-efficiency analysis in measuring the efficiency of an electricity distribution utility which involves 12 power lines as DMUs. The input indicators considered are purchased electricity supply and the total length of power lines, while electricity consumed, the number of consumers, and total power losses are the output indicators. The results revealed that 4 out of the 12 power lines are inefficient and thus need to be improved. The model provided a guideline how these inefficiencies may be addressed by means of benchmarking.

Keywords

Efficiency Data envelopment analysis Super-efficiency DEA Electricity distribution utility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The first author is also thankful for the support from the University of San Carlos in terms of resource use.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

Further, this article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Al Moussawi H, Mahdi M, Fardoun F, Louahlia-Gualous H (2015) Electric power distribution network restoration: a survey of papers and a review of the restoration problem. Recovery storage tank size: an optimization approach for tri-generation systems on diesel power generators. Energy Procedia 74:788–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amado C, Santos S, Sequeira J (2013) Using data envelopment analysis to support the design of process improvement interventions in electricity distribution. Eur J Oper Res 228:226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 39(10):1261–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azadeh A, Motevali Haghighi S, Zarrin M, Khaefi S (2015) Performance evaluation of Iranian electricity distribution units by using stochastic data envelopment analysis. Electr Power Energy Syst 73:919–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30:1078–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergey P, Ragsdale C, Hoskote M (2003) A decision support system for the electrical power districting problem. Decis Support Syst 36:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertheau P, Cader C, Müller H, Blechinger P, Seguin R, Breyer C (2014) Energy storage potential for solar based hybridization of off-grid diesel power plants in Tanzania. Energy Procedia 46:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Çelen A (2013) The effect of merger and consolidation activities on the efficiency of electricity distribution regions in Turkey. Energy Policy 59:674–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coelli TJ, Gautier A, Perelman S, Saplacan-Pop R (2013) Estimating the cost of improving quality in electricity distribution: a parametric distance function approach. Energy Policy 53:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ćurčić S, Özveren C, Crowe L, Lo P (1995) Electric power distribution network restoration: a survey of papers and a review of the restoration problem. Electr Power Syst Res 35(2):73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daim T, Iskin I (2016) An assessment model for energy efficiency program planning in electric utilities: case of Northwest U.S. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 15:42–59Google Scholar
  13. Dashti R, Yousefi S, Moghaddam M (2013) Comprehensive efficiency evaluation model for electrical distribution system considering social and urban factors. Energy 60:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Lima MAX, Clemente TRN, de Almeida AT (2016) Prioritization for allocation of voltage regulators in electricity distribution systems by using a multicriteria approach based on additive-veto model. Electr Power Energy Syst 77:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS, Shale EA (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fathabadi H (2016) Power distribution network reconfiguration for power loss minimization using novel dynamic fuzzy c-means (dFCM) clustering based ANN approach. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 78:96–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Filippini M, Wetzel H (2014) The impact of ownership unbundling on cost efficiency: empirical evidence from the New Zealand electricity distribution sector. Energy Econ 45:412–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ganguly S, Sahoo N, Das D (2013) Multi-objective planning of electrical distribution systems using dynamic programming. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 46:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giannakis D, Jamasb T, Pollitt M (2005) Benchmarking and incentive regulation of quality of service: an application to the UK electricity distribution networks. Energy Policy 33:2256–2271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gouveia MC, Dias LC, Antunes CH, Boucinha J, Inácio CF (2015) Benchmarking of maintenance and outage repair in an electricity distribution company using the value-based DEA method. Omega 53:104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guerra AI (2014) A proposal to combine classical and hypothetical extraction input-output methods to identify key sectors for the production and distribution of electricity. Energy Effic 7:1053–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo I, Lee H, Lee D (2017) An integrated model for slack-based measure of superefficiency in additive DEA. Omega 67:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hassan S, Khosravi A, Jaafar J, Khanesar MA (2016) A systematic design of interval type-2 fuzzy logic system using extreme learning machine for electricity load demand forecasting. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 82:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. International Energy Agency (2015) IEA world energy statistics and balances. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/data/iea-world-energy-statistics-and-balances_enestats-data-en
  25. Jamasb T, Pollitt M (2001) Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience. Util Policy 9:107–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khalili-Damghani K, Shahmir Z (2015) Uncertain network data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs to evaluate the efficiency of electricity power production and distribution processes. Comput Ind Eng 88:131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khalili-Damghani K, Tavana M, Haji-Saami E (2015) A data envelopment analysis model with interval data and undesirable output for combined cycle power plant performance assessment. Expert Syst Appl 42:760–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khelif A, Talha A, Belhamel M, Arab AH (2012) Feasibility study of hybrid diesel-PV power plants in the Southern of Algeria: case study on AFRA power plant. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 43(1):546–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khodabakhshi M, Asgharian M, Gregoriou GN (2010) An input-oriented super-efficiency measure in stochastic data envelopment analysis: evaluating chief executive officers of US public banks and thrifts. Expert Syst Appl 37:2092–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kyriakopoulos GL, Arabatzis G (2016) Electrical energy storage systems in electricity generation: energy policies, innovative technologies, and regulatory regimes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 56:1044–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu H, Hu B, Jin C (2016) Effects of different alcohols additives on solubility of hydrous ethanol/diesel fuel blends. Fuel 184:440–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mankale P, Tambakad S, Jangamshetti SH (2012) Operations of diesel power plant. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220036919
  33. M’esz’aros C, (1998) On free variables in interior point methods. Optim Methods Softw 9:121–139Google Scholar
  34. Meza LA, Valério RP, Soares de Mello JC (2015) Assessing the efficiency of sports in using financial resources with DEA models. Procedia Comput Sci 55:1151–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitra R, Arya V, Sullivan B, Mueller R, Storey H, Labut G (2015) Using analytics to minimize errors in the connectivity model of a power distribution network. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM sixth international conference on future energy systems. ACMGoogle Scholar
  36. Mullarkey S, Caulfield B, McCormack S, Basu B (2015) A framework for establishing the technical efficiency of electricity distribution counties (EDCs) using data envelopment analysis. Energy Convers Manag 94:112–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Munisamy S, Arabi B (2015) Eco-efficiency change in power plants: using a slacks-based measure for the meta-frontier Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. J Clean Prod 105:218–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nahra T, Mendez D, Alexander J (2009) Employing super-efficiency analysis as an alternative to DEA: an application in outpatient substance abuse treatment. Eur J Oper Res 196:1097–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nyambuu U, Semmler W (2014) Trends in the extraction of non-renewable resources: the case of fossil energy. Econ Model 37:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Omrani H, Gharizadeh Beiragh R, Shafiei Kaleibari S (2015) Performance assessment of Iranian electricity distribution companies by an integrated cooperative game data envelopment analysis principal component analysis approach. Electr Power Energy Syst 64:617–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oyedepo SO, Olayiwola FR (2011) A study of implementation of preventive maintenance programme in Nigeria power industry-Egbin thermal power plant, case study. Energy Power Eng 3(3):207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paul D, Zhong W, Bose S (2016) Energy efficiency aware load distribution and electricity cost volatility control for cloud service providers. J Netw Comput Appl 59:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pavkovic D, Sedic A, Guzovic Z (2016) Oil drilling rig diesel power-plant fuel efficiency improvement potentials through rule-based generator scheduling and utilization of battery energy storage system. Energy Convers Manag 121:194–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rahman MN, Esmailpour A, Zhao J (2016) Machine learning with big data an efficient electricity generation forecasting system. Big Data Res 5:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rehiara AB, Setiawidayat S, Bawan EK (2013) Optimal operation scheme for diesel power plant units of PT. PLN-Manokwari branch using Lagrange multiplier method. Procedia Environ Sci 17:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rehman S, El-Aminb IM, Ahmada F, Shaahida SM, Al-Shehrib AM, Bakhashwainb JM, Shasha A (2007) Feasibility study of hybrid retrofits to an isolated off-grid diesel power plant. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11:635–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rocchetta R, Patelli E (2018) Assessment of power grid vulnerabilities accounting for stochastic loads and model imprecision. Electr Power Energy Syst 98:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rojas-Zerpa JC, Yusta JM (2015) Application of multicriteria decision methods for electric supply planning in rural and remote areas. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:557–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rossi A, Aubry A, Jacomino M (2012) Connectivity-and-hop-constrained design of electricity distribution networks. Eur J Oper Res 218(1):48–57MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rozali NEM, Alwi SRW, Ho WS, Manan ZA, Klemeš JJ (2016) Integration of diesel plant into a hybrid power system using power pinch analysis. Appl Therm Eng 105:792–798Google Scholar
  51. Santos SP, Amado CAF, Rosado JR (2011) Formative evaluation of electricity distribution utilities using data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 62(7):1298–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Si J, Marjanovic-Halburd L, Nasiri F, Bell S (2016) Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: a review and case study on applications of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method. Sustain Cities Soc 27:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2013) A comparative study among fossil fuel power plants in PJM and California ISO by DEA environmental assessment. Energy Econ 40:130–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2015) Environmental assessment on coal-fired power plants in U.S. Northeast region by DEA non-radial measurement. Energy Econ 50:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sultana B, Mustafa MW, Sultana U, Bhatti AR (2016) Review on reliability improvement and power loss reduction in distribution system via network reconfiguration. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 66:297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tavassoli M, Faramarzi GR, Saen RF (2015) Ranking electricity distribution units using slacks-based measure, strong complementary slackness condition, and discriminant analysis. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:1214–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trindade D, Barroso AP, Machado VH (2015) Project management efficiency of a Portuguese electricity distribution utility using data envelopment analysis. Procedia Comput Sci 64:674–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang H (2015) A generalized MCDA-DEA (multi-criterion decision analysis-data envelopment analysis) approach to construct slacks-based composite indicator. Energy 80:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang Y, Ronilaya F, Chen X, Roskilly AP (2013) Modelling and simulation of a distributed power generation system with energy storage to meet dynamic household electricity demand. Appl Therm Eng 50(1):523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu J, Yin P, Sun J, Chu J, Liang L (2016) Evaluating the environmental efficiency of a two-stage system with undesired outputs by a DEA approach: an interest preference perspective. Eur J Oper Res 254:1047–1062MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu L, Yang J (2001) Introduction to multi-criteria decision making and the evidential reasoning approach. Manchester School of Management, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang L, Ouyang H, Fang K, Ye L, Zhang J (2015) Evaluation of regional environmental efficiencies in China based on super-efficiency-DEA. Ecol Ind 51:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yilmaz S, Ozcalik HR, Aksu M, Karapınar C (2015) Dynamic simulation of a PV-diesel-battery hybrid plant for off grid electricity supply. Energy Procedia 75:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. You Y, Jie T (2016) A study of the operation efficiency and cost performance indices of power-supply companies in China based on a dynamic network slacks-based measure model. Omega 60:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yuzhi S, Zhangna (2012) Study of the input-output overall performance evaluation of electricity distribution based on DEA method. Application of multicriteria decision methods for electric supply planning in rural and remote areas. Energy Procedia 16:1517–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miriam F. Bongo
    • 1
  • Lanndon A. Ocampo
    • 2
  • Yannie Ann D. Magallano
    • 3
  • Geraldine A. Manaban
    • 3
  • Ezra Kim F. Ramos
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of San CarlosCebu CityPhilippines
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringCebu Technological UniversityCebu CityPhilippines
  3. 3.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of San CarlosCebu CityPhilippines

Personalised recommendations