Data processing model and performance analysis of cognitive computing based on machine learning in Internet environment



To solve the problem that the rapid growth of data scale in the Internet environment makes it more difficult to extract meaningful information from massive data, a cognitive computing model is proposed, and the data processing technology that the model can use and the task scheduling algorithm under distributed background conditions are explored. In addition, aiming at the decision-making problem of the availability of massive information in the Internet, a cognitive decision algorithm based on deep confidence network and linear perceptron is proposed. According to the result of deep confidence network training, a cognitive decision model with error control function is established, and the decision result of whether the information is effective or not is given by considering the information itself and context information comprehensively. The experimental results show that the cognitive decision model based on deep belief network and linear perceptron performs well in the late training period. In addition, according to the experimental results, the most suitable operating parameters are selected. The accuracy of the algorithm is much higher than that of the deep belief network and the multilayer perceptron, indicating that this algorithm has some improvement in cognitive decision accuracy.


Internet environment Cognitive computing Machine learning Data processing 



This study was not funded by any other parties. Author Hu Jin does not have received any research grants from any other companies.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author Hu Jin declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Ambroise M, Buccelli S, Grassia F et al (2017) Biomimetic neural network for modifying biological dynamics during hybrid experiments. Artif Life Robot 22(3):398–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreou AG, Dykman AA, Fischl KD et al (2016) IEEE international symposium on Real-time sensory information processing using the TrueNorth neurosynaptic system//circuits and systems (ISCAS). IEEE, pp 2911–2911Google Scholar
  3. Bottou L, Curtis FE, Nocedal J (2018) Optimization methods for large-scale machine learning. SIAM Rev 60(2):223–311MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen CLP, Zhang CY (2014) Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: a survey on Big Data. Inf Sci 275:314–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Argentinis JDE, Weber G (2016) IBM Watson: how cognitive computing can be applied to big data challenges in life sciences research. Clin Ther 38(4):688–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gottlieb J, Lopes M, Oudeyer PY (2016) Motivated cognition: neural and computational mechanisms of curiosity, attention, and intrinsic motivation. In: Recent developments in neuroscience research on human motivation. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 149–172Google Scholar
  7. Gupta S, Kar AK, Baabdullah A et al (2018) Big data with cognitive computing: a review for the future. Int J Inf Manag 42:78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Itaya K, Takahashi K, Nakamura M et al (2016) BriCA: a modular software platform for whole brain architecture. In: International conference on neural information processing. Springer, Cham, pp 334–341Google Scholar
  9. Jozwik KM, Kriegeskorte N, Storrs KR et al (2017) Deep convolutional neural networks outperform feature-based but not categorical models in explaining object similarity judgments. Front Psychol 8:1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lakhani P, Sundaram B (2017) Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks. Radiology 284(2):574–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lempel R (2017) Personalization is a two-way street//proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on recommender systems. ACM, pp 3–3Google Scholar
  12. Loebbecke C, Picot A (2015) Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: a research agenda. J Strateg Inf Syst 24(3):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loia V, D’Aniello G, Gaeta A et al (2016) Enforcing situation awareness with granular computing: a systematic overview and new perspectives. Granul Comput 1(2):127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mirosa M, Yip R, Lentz G (2018) Content analysis of the ‘clean your plate campaign’on sina weibo. J Food Prod Mark 24(5):539–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Qiu T, Luo D, Xia F et al (2016) A greedy model with small world for improving the robustness of heterogeneous Internet of Things. Comput Netw 101:127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhao S, Medhi D (2017) Application-aware network design for hadoop mapreduce optimization using software-defined networking. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag 14(4):804–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zheng J, Guo S, Gao L et al (2018) Inferring Gender of Micro-Blog Users based on Multi-Classifiers Fusion. Int J Perform Eng 14(2):349Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Human Settlements and Civil EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations