Uncertain multi-objective Chinese postman problem
- 228 Downloads
Chinese postman problem is one of the significant combinatorial optimization problems with a wide range of real-world applications. Modelling such real-world applications quite often needs to consider some uncertain factors for which the belief degrees of the experts are essential. Liu (Uncertainty Theory, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, 2007) proposed uncertainty theory to model such human beliefs. This paper presents a multi-objective Chinese postman problem under the framework of uncertainty theory. The objectives of the problem are to maximize the total profit earned and to minimize the total travel time of the tour of a postman. Here, we have proposed an expected value model (EVM) for the uncertain multi-objective Chinese postman problem (UMCPP). The deterministic transformation of the corresponding EVM is done by computing the expected value of the uncertain variable using 999-method for which we have proposed an algorithm, 999-expected value model-uncertain multi-objective Chinese postman problem. Subsequently, the model is solved by two classical multi-objective solution techniques, namely global criterion method and fuzzy programming method. Two multi-objective genetic algorithms (MOGAs): nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II and multi-objective cross-generational elitist selection, heterogeneous recombination and cataclysmic mutation are also used to solve the model. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the proposed model. Finally, the performance of MOGAs is compared on six randomly generated instances of UMCPP.
KeywordsUncertain multi-objective Chinese postman problem Expected value model 999-Method NSGA-II MOCHC
The authors are very much thankful to the Editor and the anonymous referees for their constructive and valuable suggestions to enhance the quality of the manuscript. Moreover, Saibal Majumder, an INSPIRE fellow (No.: DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2015/IF150410) is indebted to the Department of Science & Technology (DST), Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, for providing him financial assistance for the work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent is obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Christofides N, Campos V, Corberan A, Mota E (1981) An algorithm for the rural postman problem. Imperial College report IC-ORGoogle Scholar
- Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197Google Scholar
- Eshelman LJ (1991) The CHC adaptive search algorithm: how to have safe search when engaging. Found Genet Algorithm 1:265–283Google Scholar
- Fonseca CM, Fleming PJ (1993) Genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on genetic algorithms, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 416–423Google Scholar
- Liu B (2009a) Some research problems in uncertainty theory. J Uncertain Syst 3(1):3–10Google Scholar
- Liu B (2012) Why is there a need for uncertainty theory? J Uncertain Syst 6(1):3–10Google Scholar
- Liu YH, Ha MH (2010) Expected value of function of uncertain variables. J Uncertain Syst 4(3):181–186Google Scholar
- Nebro AJ, Alba E, Molina G, Chicano F, Luna F, Durillo JJ (2007) Optimal antenna placement using a new multi-objective CHC algorithm. In: GECCO ‘07 proceedings of the 9th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, New York, NY, USA, pp 876–883Google Scholar
- Rao SS (2006) Engineering optimization-theory and practice, 3rd edn. New Age International Publishers, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
- Tan G, Cui X, Zhang Y (2005) Chinese postman problem in stochastic networks. In: ICAS/ICNS 2005 proceedings of the joint international conference on autonomic and autonomous systems and international conference on networking and services. IEEE Computer Society, Papeete, Tahiti, pp 78–78Google Scholar
- Van Veldhuizen DA, Lamont GB (1998) Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm research: a history and analysis. Technical report TR-98-03, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson, AFB, OHGoogle Scholar
- Zhang B, Peng J (2012) Uncertain programming model for Chinese postman problem with uncertain weights. Ind Eng Manag Syst 11(1):18–25Google Scholar
- Zhou A, Jin Y, Zhang Q, Sendho B, Tsang E (2006) Combining model-based and genetics-based offspring generation for multi-objective optimization using a convergence criterion. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Sheraton Vancouver Wall Center Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp 3234–3241Google Scholar