Semantic distance between vague concepts in a framework of modeling with words
- 207 Downloads
Effectively measuring the similarity or dissimilarity of two vague concepts plays a key step in reasoning and computing with vague concepts. In this paper, we define semantic distances between data instances and vague concepts based on modeling vagueness in a framework called label semantics. We also propose two clustering methods based on these sematic distances, which can cluster data instances and vague concepts simultaneously. To evaluate our approach, we conduct several experimental studies on three datasets including Corel images and labels, Reuters-21578, and TDT2. It is illustrated that the proposed distances have the ability to effectively evaluate sematic similarities between data instances and vague concepts.
KeywordsVague concepts Label semantics Semantic distance Clustering
This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61572162 and 61272188) and the Zhejiang Provincial Key Science and Technology Project Foundation (No. 2017C01010).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Daniel R, Lawry J, Rico-Ramirez A, Clukie D (2007) Classification of weather radar images using linguistic decision trees with conditional labelling. In: FUZZ-IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- Goldberger J, Hinton G, Roweis S, Salakhutdinov R (2005) Neighbourhood components analysis. In: NIPS, pp 513–520Google Scholar
- Gu B, Sheng VS (2016) A robust regularization path algorithm for \(v\)-support vector classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 1:1–8Google Scholar
- H Druker CB (1997) Support vector regression machine. In: NIPS, pp 155–161Google Scholar
- Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. In: Technical report, Engineering faculty, Computer Engineering Department. Erciyes University Press, ErciyesGoogle Scholar
- Lavrenko V, Manmatha R, Jeon J (2004) A model for learning the semantics of pictures. In: NIPSGoogle Scholar
- Lovasz L, Plummer M (1986) Matching theory. BudapestGoogle Scholar
- MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, pp 281–297Google Scholar
- McCulloch J, Wagner C, Akckelin U (2013) Measuring the directional distance between fuzzy sets. In: UKCI 2013, the 13th annual workshop on computational intelligence, Surrey University, pp 38–45Google Scholar
- Nieradka G, Butkiewicz B (2007) A method for automatic membership function estimation based on fuzzy measures. Foundations of fuzzy logic and soft computing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 451–460Google Scholar
- P Groenen UK, Rosmalen JV (2007) Fuzzy clustering with minkowski distance function. In: Advances in fuzzy clustering and its applications, pp 53–68Google Scholar
- Rosmalen JV (2006) Fuzzy clustering with minkowski distance. In: Econometric, pp 53–68Google Scholar
- V Srivastava, Tripathi BK, Pathak VK (2011) An evolutionaru fuzzy clustering with minkowski distances. In: International conference on neural information processing, pp 753–760Google Scholar
- Xiaohui C, Potok T (2005) Document clustering analysis based on hybrid PSO+ k-means algorithm. J Comput Sci Special issue (April 15):27–33Google Scholar
- Xing EP, Jordan MI, Russell SJ, Ng AY (2002) Distance metric learning with application to clustering with side-information. In: NIPS, pp 521–528Google Scholar
- Zhang W, Qin Z, Tao W (2012) Semi-automatic image annotation using sparse coding. In: ICMLCGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Schneider J (2012) Maximum margin output coding. In: ICMLGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Y, Jeon B, Xu D, Wu QJ, Zhang H (2015) Image segmentation by generalized hierarchical fuzzy c-means algorithm. Neural Netw 28(2):961–973Google Scholar