Soft Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 1445–1455 | Cite as

Adaptive switching filter for impulse noise removal in digital content

Focus
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a new fuzzy-rule-based impulse noise denoising method that removes unwanted artifacts and reconstructs original images is proposed. The proposed method is based on the fuzzy rule selective approach, which has four sub-methods. The proposed method can effectively remove noise artifacts that are caused by various levels of impulse noise. Simulation results show that the presented method outperforms conventional methods. The proposed method can be directly applied to various consumer electronics displays.

Keywords

Color processing Denoising Multimedia Immersion Impulse noise Artificial intelligence Image display 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Institutes of Convergence Science and Technology, Incheon National University Research Grant in 2016.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Pyoung Won Kim declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Abrahim BA, Mustafa ZA, Kadah YM (2011) Modified non-local means filter for effective speckle reduction in ultrasound images. Proc NRSC 2011:1–8Google Scholar
  2. Aiswarya K, Jayaraj V, Ebenezer D (2010) A new and efficient algorithm for the removal of high density salt and pepper noise in images and videos. In: Second international conference on computer modeling and simulation, 2010. ICCMS’10, 22–24 Jan 2010. IEEE . doi: 10.1109/ICCMS.2010.310
  3. Chan RH, Ho Chung-Wa, Nikolova M (2005a) Salt and pepper noise removal by median type noise detectors and detail-preserving regularization. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(10):1479–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan RH, Ho Chung-Wa, Nikolova M (2005b) Salt and pepper noise removal by median type noise detectors and detail-preserving regularization. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(10):1479–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Tao, Ma Kai-Kuang, Chen Li-Hui (1999) Tristate median filter for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 8(12):1834–1838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen X, Jeon G, Jeong J (2012) A filter switching interpolation method for deinterlacing. SPIE Opt Eng 51(10):107402Google Scholar
  7. Dong YQ, Xu SF (2007) A new directional weighted median filter for removal of random-valued impulse noise. IEEE Signal Process Lett 14(3):193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamza Ben, Luque P, Martinez J, Roman R (1999) Removing noise and preserving details with relaxed median filters. J Math Imag Vis 11(2):161–177MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ibrahim H (2012) Adaptive switching median filter utilizing quantized window size to remove impulse noise from digital images. Asian Trans Fundam Electron Commun Multimed 2(1):1–6MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeon G, Jeong J (2006) Designing Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy model based motion adaptive deinterlacing system. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 52(3):1013–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeon G, You J, Jeong J (2009a) Weighted fuzzy reasoning scheme for interlaced to progressive conversion. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 19(6):842–855Google Scholar
  12. Jeon G, Park SJ, Fang Y, Anisetti M, Bellandi V, Damiani E, Jeong J (2009b) Specification of efficient block matching scheme for motion estimation in video compression. SPIE Opt Eng 48(12):127005Google Scholar
  13. Jeon G, Anisetti M, Kim D, Bellandi V, Damiani E, Jeong J (2009c) Fuzzy rough sets hybrid scheme for motion and scene complexity adaptive deinterlacing. Image Vis Comput 27(4):425–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeon G, Anisetti M, Bellandi V, Damiani E, Jeong J (2009d) Designing of a type-2 fuzzy logic filter for improving edge-preserving restoration of interlaced-to-progressive conversion. Inf Sci 179(13):2194–2207Google Scholar
  15. Jeon G, Anisetti M, Lee J, Bellandi V, Damiani E, Jeong J (2009e) Concept of linguistic variable-based fuzzy ensemble approach: application to interlaced HDTV sequences. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(6):1245–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koike-Akino T, Popovski P, Tarokh V (2009) Denoising strategy for convolutionally-coded bidirectional relaying. In: Proceedings of ICC 2009Google Scholar
  17. Park SJ, Jeon G, Jeong J (2010) Covariance-based adaptive deinterlacing method using edge map. In: Proceedings of image processing theory tools and applications (IPTA), pp 166–171Google Scholar
  18. Park S-J, Jeon G, Wu J, Jeong J (2013) An interpolation scheme based on Bayes classifier. IS&T/SPIE J Electron Imag 22(2):023003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roig B, Estruch VD (2016) Localised rank-ordered differences vector filter for suppression of high-density impulse noise in colour images. IET Image Process 10(1):24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Srinivasan KS, Ebenezer D (2007) A new fast and efficient decision based algorithm for removal of high density impulse noise. IEEE Signal Process Lett 14(3):189–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang Z, Zhang D (1999a) Progressive switching median filter for the removal of impulse noise from highly corrupted images. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Analog Digit Signal Process 46:78–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang Z, Zhang D (1999b) Progressive switching median filter for the removal of impulse noise from highly corrupted images. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Analog Digit Signal Process 46(1):78–80MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang J, Jeon G, Jeong J (2015) A hybrid algorithm using maximum a posteriori for interlaced to progressive scanning format conversion. IEEE/OSA J Disp Technol 11(2):183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu J, Huang J, Jeon G, Cho J, Jeong J, Jiao L (2011) An adaptive autoregressive deinterlacing method. SPIE Opt Eng 50(5):057001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu J, Song Z, Jeon G (2014) GPU-parallel implementation of the edge-directed adaptive intra-field deinterlacing method. IEEE/OSA J Disp Technol 10(9):746–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu J, Anisetti M, Wu W, Damiani E, Jeon G (2016a) Bayer demosaicking with polynomial interpolation. IEEE Trans Image Process 25(11):5369–5382MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu J, Deng L, Jeon G, Jeong J (2016b) GPU-parallel interpolation using the edge-direction based normal vector method for terrain triangular mesh. J Real-Time Image Proc. doi: 10.1007/s11554-016-0575-1
  28. Yang R, Yin L, Gabbouj M, Astola J, Neuvo Y (1995) Optimal weighted median filtering under structural constraints. IEEE Trans Signal Process 43(3):591–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou Z (2012a) Cognition and removal of impulse noise with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(7):3157–3167MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou Z (2012b) Cognition and removal of impulse noise with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(7):3157–3167MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institutes of Convergence Science and TechnologyIncheon National UniversityIncheonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations