Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 997–1006 | Cite as

An approach based on reliability-based possibility degree of interval for solving general interval bilevel linear programming problem

  • Aihong RenEmail author
  • Yuping Wang
Methodologies and Application

Abstract

This paper presents a new method based on reliability-based possibility degree of interval to handle the general interval bilevel linear programming problem involving interval coefficients in both objective functions and constraints. Considering reliability of the uncertain constraints, the interval inequality constraints are first converted into their deterministic equivalent forms by virtue of the reliability-based possibility degree of interval, and then the original problem is transformed into a bilevel linear programming with interval coefficients in the upper and lower level objective functions only. Then, the notion of the optimal solution of the problem is given by means of a type of the interval order relation. Based on this concept, the transformed problem is reduced into a deterministic bilevel programming with the aid of linear combination method. Furthermore, the proposed method is extended to deal with the fuzzy bilevel linear programming problem through the nearest interval approximation. Finally, three numerical examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Keywords

Bilevel programming Interval number Fuzzy number Reliability-based possibility degree of interval 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61602010) and Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2017JQ6046).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abass SA (2010) An interval number programming approach for bilevel linear programming problem. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 5(6):461–464Google Scholar
  2. Alizadeh SM, Marcotte P, Savard G (2013) Two-stage stochastic bilevel programming over a transportation network. Transp Res B Methodol 58:92–105Google Scholar
  3. Allende GB, Still G (2013) Solving bilevel programs with the KKT-approach. Math Progr 138(1–2):309–332MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Bard JF (1998) Practical bilevel optimization: algorithms and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Calvete HI, Galé C (2012) Linear bilevel programming with interval coefficients. J Comput Appl Math 236(15):3751–3762MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cecchini M, Ecker J, Kupferschmid M, Leitch R (2013) Solving nonlinear principal-agent problems using bilevel programming. Eur J Oper Res 230(2):364–373MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G (2007) An overview of bilevel optimization. Ann Oper Res 153(1):235–256MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Dempe S (2002) Foundations of bilevel programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Dempe S, Kalashnikov V, Pérez-Valdés GA, Kalashnykova N (2015) Bilevel programming problems: theory, algorithms and applications to energy networks. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubois D, Prade H (1978) Operations on fuzzy numbers. Int J Syst Sci 9:613–626MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubois D, Prade H (1987) The mean value of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets Syst 24:279–300MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Grzegorzewski P (2002) Nearest interval approximation of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets Syst 130(3):321–330MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamidi F, Nehi HM (2013) Bilevel linear programming with fuzzy parameters. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 10(4):83–89MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Ishibuchi H, Tanaka H (1990) Multiobjective programming in optimization of the interval objective function. Eur J Oper Res 48(2):219–225zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiang C, Han X, Liu GR, Liu GP (2008) A nonlinear interval number programming method for uncertain optimization problems. Eur J Oper Res 188:1–13MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang C, Han X, Li D (2012) A new interval comparison relation and application in interval number programming for uncertain problems. Comput Mater Continua 27(3):275–303Google Scholar
  17. Kalashnikov VV, Dempe S, Pérez-Valdés GA (2015) Bilevel programming and applications. Math Probl Eng 2015:16MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Kis T, Kovács A (2013) Exact solution approaches for bilevel lot-sizing. Eur J Oper Res 226(2):237–245MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Kosuch S, Le Bodic P, Leung J, Lisser A (2012) On a stochastic bilevel programming problem. Networks 59(1):107–116MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu B (2006) A survey of credibility theory. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 5:387–408MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu XW, Da QL (1999) A satisfactory solution for interval number linear programming. J Syst Eng 14:123–128MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore RE (1979) Methods and applications of interval analysis. SIAM, PhiladelphiazbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Nehi HM, Hamidi F (2015) Upper and lower bounds for the optimal values of the interval bilevel linear programming problem. Appl Math Model 39(5–6):1650–1664MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Ren AH, Wang YP (2014) A cutting plane method for bilevel linear programming with interval coefficients. Ann Oper Res 223:355–378MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi CG, Lu J, Zhang GQ (2005) An extended Kth-best approach for linear bilevel programming. Appl Math Comput 164(3):843–855MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang JZ, Du G (2011) Research on the method for interval linear bi-level programming based on a partial order on intervals. In: 2011 eighth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery, pp 682–686Google Scholar
  27. Xu ZS, Da QL (2003) Possibility degree method for ranking interval numbers and its application. J Syst Eng 18(1):67–70MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. Ye JJ, Zhu DL (2010) New necessary optimality conditions for bilevel programs by combining the MPEC and value function approaches. SIAM J Optim 20(4):1885–1905MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(1):338–353zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang GQ, Lu J (2005) The definition of optimal solution and an extended Kuhn–Tucker approach for fuzzy linear bilevel programming. IEEE Comput Intell Bull 5:1–7Google Scholar
  31. Zhang GQ, Lu J (2010) Fuzzy bilevel programming with multiple objectives and cooperative multiple followers. J Global Optim 47:403–419MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Q, Fan Z, Pan D (1999) Ranking approach for interval numbers in uncertain multiple attribute decision making problems. Syst Eng Theory Pract 5:129–133Google Scholar
  33. Zhang GQ, Lu J, Dillon T (2007) Fuzzy linear bilevel optimization: solution concepts, approaches and applications. Stud Fuzziness Soft Comput 215:351–379MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang GQ, Zhang GL, Gao Y, Lu J (2011) Competitive strategic bidding optimization in electricity markets using bilevel programming and swarm technique. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(6):2138–2146Google Scholar
  35. Zimmermann HJ (1996) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer, NorwellzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsBaoji University of Arts and SciencesBaojiChina
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and TechnologyXidian UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations