Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 847–857 | Cite as

Rescheduling-based congestion management scheme using particle swarm optimization with distributed acceleration constants

  • Naresh Kumar YadavEmail author
Methodologies and Application
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

Rescheduling-based congestion management schemes are prominent solutions for secure and reliable power flow under deregulated environment. Since the rescheduling process exhibits multimodal behavior by nature, the role of heuristic methods has become crucial. Despite numerous heuristic search algorithms are reported in the literature to address the challenge, this paper attempts to improve Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), which is a renowned swarm intelligence-based optimization algorithm. Our improved version of PSO intends to determine adaptive acceleration constants based on the particle position and the evaluation it has undergone till the current iteration. Due to the distributed nature of acceleration constant, this paper calls the proposed PSO as PSO with distributed acceleration constant (PSODAC). PSODAC attempts to solve the rescheduling problem in a hybrid electricity market so that congestion is aimed to minimize at best rescheduling cost. An experimental investigation is carried out in IEEE14 bus system under single point as well as multipoint congestion scenarios. Subsequently, the dynamics of the particles are also investigated. The experimental results show that PSODAC is better than PSO in terms of cost-effective congestion mitigation as well as exhibiting high particle dynamics.

Keywords

Congestion PSO PSODAC Rescheduling Hybrid Electricity 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Acharya N, Mithulananthan N (2007) Locating series FACTS devices for congestion management in deregulated electricity markets. Electr Power Syst Res 77(3):352–60Google Scholar
  2. Angarita JM, Usaola JG (2007) Combining hydro-generation and wind energy biddings and operation on electricity spot markets. Electr Power Syst Res 77:391–400Google Scholar
  3. Bhatnagar K, Gupta SC (2016) Investigating and modeling the effect of laser intensity and nonlinear regime of the fiber on the optical link. J Opt Commun 38:341–354Google Scholar
  4. Bompard E, Correia P, Gross M, Amelin M (2003) Congestion-management schemes: a comparative analysis under a unified framework. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(1):346–52Google Scholar
  5. Borghetti A, D’Ambrosio C, Lodi A, Martello S (2008) An MILP approach for short-term hydro scheduling and unit commitment with head-dependent reservoir. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(3):1115–24Google Scholar
  6. Cheng JW, Galiana FD, McGillis DT (1998) Studies of bilateral contracts with respect to steady-state security in a deregulated environment of electricity supply. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(3):1020–5Google Scholar
  7. Cheng Z, Fan L, Zhang Y (2017) Multi-agent decision support system for missile defense based on improved PSO algorithm. J Syst Eng Electron 28(3):514–525Google Scholar
  8. Conejo AJ, Arroyo JM, Contreras J, Villamor FA (2002) Self-scheduling of a hydro producer in a pool-based electricity market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(4):1265–72Google Scholar
  9. Esmaili M, Ebadi F, Shayanfar HA, Jadid S (2013) Congestion management in hybrid power markets using modified Benders decomposition. Appl Energy 102:1004–12Google Scholar
  10. Galiana FD, Ilic M (1998) A Mathematical framework for the analysis and management of power transactions under open access. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(May (2)):681–687Google Scholar
  11. Hazra J, Sinha AK (2007) Congestion management using multiobjective particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(4):1726–34Google Scholar
  12. Hogan WW (1997) Nodes and zones in electricity markets: seeking simplified congestion pricing. In: 18th Annual North American conference of the USAEE/IAEE, San Francisco, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  13. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks IV, pp 1942–1948Google Scholar
  14. Kumar A, Mittapalli RK (2014) Congestion management with generic load model in hybrid electricity markets with FACTS devices. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 57:49–63Google Scholar
  15. Kumar A, Sekhar C (2012) Demand response based congestion management in a mix of pool and bilateral electricity market model. Front Energy 6(2):164–78Google Scholar
  16. Kumar A, Sekhar C (2013a) Congestion management with FACTS devices in deregulated electricity markets ensuring loadability limit. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 46:258–73Google Scholar
  17. Kumar A, Sekhar C (2013b) Comparison of sen transformer and UPFC for congestion management in hybrid electricity markets. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 47:295–304Google Scholar
  18. Kumar A, Srivastava SC, Singh SN (2005a) A zonal congestion management approach using ac transmission congestion distribution factors. Electr Power Syst Res 72(1):85–93Google Scholar
  19. Kumar A, Srivastava SC, Singh SN (2005b) Congestion management in competitive power market: a bibliographical survey. Electr Power Syst Res 76(1):153–64Google Scholar
  20. Luo C, Hou Y, Wen J, Cheng S (2014) Assessment of market flows for interregional congestion management in electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(4):1673–1682Google Scholar
  21. Mithulananthan N, Canizares CA, Reeve J (2000) Indices to detect hopf bifurcation in power systems. In: Proceedings of NAPS-2000, pp 15–18–15–23Google Scholar
  22. Muneender E, Vinodkumar DM (2012) Real coded genetic algorithm based dynamic congestion management in open power markets. In: Transmission and distribution conference and exposition (T&D), IEEE PES, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  23. pal Verma Y, Sharma AK (2015) Congestion management solution under secure bilateral transactions in hybrid electricity market for hydro-thermal combination. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:398–407Google Scholar
  24. Poornima S, Sharma R (2014) Estimation of line parameters of an IEEE 14 bus system. IJRSI, I(II)Google Scholar
  25. Rao Yarrapragada KSS, Krishna Mohan R, Vijay Kiran B (2012) Composite pressure vessels. Int J Res Eng Technol 1:597–618Google Scholar
  26. Settles M (2005) An introduction to particle swarm optimization. Department of Computer Science, University of Idaho, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh K, Padhy NP, Sharma J (2011) Congestion management considering hydrothermal combined operation in a pool based electricity market. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(8):1513–9Google Scholar
  28. Srivastava SC, Kumar P (2000) Optimal power dispatch in deregulated market considering congestion management. In: International conference on electric utility deregulation and restructuring and power technologies, DRPT, pp 53–59Google Scholar
  29. Sunil Kumar BS, Manjunath AS, Christopher S (2016) Improved entropy encoding for high efficient video coding standard. Alex Eng J. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2016.09.003
  30. Tan Y, Ding K (2016) A survey on GPU-based implementation of swarm intelligence algorithms. IEEE Trans Cybern 46(9):2028–2041Google Scholar
  31. Wu K, Reju VG, Khong AWH, Goh ST (2017) Swarm intelligence based particle filter for alternating talker localization and tracking using microphone arrays. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 25(6):1384–1397Google Scholar
  32. Xiao Y, Wang P, Goel L (2009) Congestion management in hybrid power markets. Electr Power Syst Res 79(10):1416–23Google Scholar
  33. Yamin HY, Shahidehpour SM (2003) Transmission congestion and voltage profile management coordination in competitive electricity markets. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 25(10):849–61Google Scholar
  34. Yamina HY, Shahidehpour SM (2003) Congestion management coordination in the deregulated power market. Electr Power Syst Res 65(2):119–27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and TechnologyDeenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and TechnologyMurthal (Sonepat)India

Personalised recommendations