Modelling influence in group decision making
- 889 Downloads
Group decision making has been widely studied since group decision making processes are very common in many fields. Formal representation of the experts’ opinions, aggregation of assessments or selection of the best alternatives has been some of main areas addressed by scientists and researchers. In this paper, we focus on another promising area, the study of group decision making processes from the concept of influence and social networks. In order to do so, we present a novel model that gathers the experts’ initial opinions and provides a framework to represent the influence of a given expert over the other(s). With this proposal it is feasible to estimate both the evolution of the group decision making process and the final solution before carrying out the group discussion process and consequently foreseeing possible actions.
KeywordsGroup decision making Aggregation operators Social network Influence
This research work has been supported with Feder funding by the research project of Education Ministery TIN2013-40658-P. No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study.
This study was funded by the research project of Education Ministery TIN2013-40658-P.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2007) Consistency of reciprocal preference relations. In: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZYGoogle Scholar
- Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2008) A note on the estimation of missing pairwise preference values: a uninorm consistency based method. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst 16(SUPPL.2):19–32Google Scholar
- Ciasullo MV, Gaeta M, Monetta G, Rarità L (2015) E-cultural value co-creation. A proposed model for the heritage management. In: Proceedings of 18th Toulon-Verona International Conference, “Excellence in Services”, vol. U, pp 139–158Google Scholar
- Friedkin NE, Johnsen EC (1990) Social influence and opinions. J Math Sociol 15:193–206Google Scholar
- Friedkin NE, Johnsen EC (1999) Social influence networks and opinion change. Adv Gr Process 16:1–29Google Scholar
- Harary F (1959) A criterion for unanimity in French’s theory of social power. Studies in social power. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Oxford, pp 168–182Google Scholar
- Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1997) Consensus under fuzziness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kitainik L (1993) Fuzzy decision procedures with binary relations: towards a unified theory. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Luce RD, Suppes, P (1965) Preferences, utility and subject probability. Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol III. Wiley, New York, pp 249–410Google Scholar
- Morente-Molinera J, Pérez I, Ureña M, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Building and managing fuzzy ontologies with heterogeneous linguistic information. Knowl Based Syst 88:154–164Google Scholar
- Morente-Molinera J, Al-hmouz R, Morfeq A, Balamash A, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) A decision support system for decision making in changeable and multi-granular fuzzy linguistic contexts. J Mult Valued Logic Soft Comput (In press) Google Scholar
- Seo F, Sakawa M (1985) Fuzzy multiattribute utility analysis for collective choice. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15(1):45–53Google Scholar
- Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12(2):117–131Google Scholar
- Tanino T (1988) Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Non-conventional preference relations in decision making. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 54–71Google Scholar
- Tanino T (1990) On group decision making under fuzzy preferences. Multiperson decision making using fuzzy sets and possibility theory. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, pp 172–185Google Scholar
- Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Yager RR, Filev D (1998) Operations for granular computing: mixing words and numbers. IEEE Int Conf Fuzzy Syst 1:123–128Google Scholar