Soft Computing

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 1695–1711 | Cite as

Embedding intelligent eco-aware systems within everyday things to increase people’s energy awareness

  • Diego Casado-Mansilla
  • Juan López-de-Armentia
  • Daniela Ventura
  • Pablo Garaizar
  • Diego López-de-Ipiña


There is a lack of energy consumption awareness in working spaces. People in their workplaces do not receive energy consumption feedback nor do they pay a monthly invoice to electricity providers. In order to enhance workers’ energy awareness, we have transformed everyday shared electrical appliances which are placed in common spaces (e.g. beamer projectors, coffee-makers, printers, screens, portable fans, kettles, and so on) into persuasive eco-aware everyday things. The proposed approach lets these appliances report their usage patterns to a Cloud-server where the data are transformed into time-series and then processed to obtain the appliances’ next-week usage forecast. Autoregressive integrated moving average model has been selected as the potentially most accurate method for processing such usage predictions when compared with the performance exhibited by three different configurations of Artificial neural networks. Our major contribution is the application of soft computing techniques to the field of sustainable persuasive technologies. Thus, consumption predictions are used to trigger timely persuasive interactions to help device users to operate the appliances as efficiently, energy-wise, as possible. Qualitative and quantitative results were gathered in a between-three-groups study related with the use of shared electrical coffee-makers at workplace. The goal of these studies was to assess the effectiveness of the proposed eco-aware design in a workplace environment in terms of energy saving and the degree of affiliation between people and the smart appliances to create a green-team relationship.


Eco-aware everyday things Persuasive eco-feedback  Energy awareness Machine learning  Time series ARIMA models 



The authors are very grateful to the University of Deusto for the financial support to their Ph.D. studies and also to the project Future Internet II (IE11-316) supported by the Basque Government.


  1. Adebiyi AA, Adewumi AO, Ayo CK (2014) Comparison of ARIMA and artificial neural networks models for stock price prediction. J Appl Math 2014. doi: 10.1155/2014/614342
  2. Arroyo E, Bonanni L, Selker T (2005) Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink. In: Proc. of CHI’05, pp 631–639Google Scholar
  3. Box GEP, Jenkins G (1990) Time series analysis, forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San FranciscozbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Broms L, Katzeff C et al. (2010) Coffee maker patterns and the design of energy feedback artefacts. In: Proc. of DIS’10, ACM, pp 93–102Google Scholar
  5. Brynjarsdóttir H, Håkansson M, Baumer E, DiSalvo C, Sengers P (2012) Pierce, James, sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In: Proc. of CHI’12. ACM, pp 947–956Google Scholar
  6. Bush, E., Nipkow, J., Josephy, B., Heutling, S., Griesshammer, R.: Strategies to enhance energy efficiency of coffee machines. In: Proc. of EEDAL’09 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. CarbonTrust (2013) CarbonTrust: employee awareness and office energy efficiency. Accessed 30 Sep 2014
  8. Carrico AR, Riemer M (2011) Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education. J Environ Psychol 31(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casado-Mansilla D, López-De-Armentia J, Garaizar P, López-De-Ipiña D (2014) To switch the coffee maker or not: that is the question to be energy efficient at work. In: Proc. of E.A. of CHI’14 (publication pending). ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Chai T, Draxler RR (2014) Root mean square error (rmse) or mean absolute error (mae)? Arguments against avoiding rmse in the literature. Geosci Model Dev 7(3):1247–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman J (2005) Emotionally durable design: objects, experiences and empathy. Earthscan LLC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Chetty M, Tran D, Grinter RE (2008) Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home. In: Proc. of UbiComp’08. ACM, pp 242–251Google Scholar
  13. Costanza E, Ramchurn SD, Jennings NR (2012) Understanding domestic energy consumption through interactive visualisation. In: Proc. of UbiComp’12. ACM, pp 216–225Google Scholar
  14. Crosbie T, Houghton M (2012) Sustainability in the workplace. In: Technical report, sustainability at workGoogle Scholar
  15. Daamen DDL, Staats H, Wilke HAM, Engelen M (2001) Improving environmental behavior in companies:the effectiveness of tailored versus nontailored interventions. J Environ Behav 33(2):229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darby S (2006) The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: a review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. In: Technical report. University of Oxford, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Darley JM, Latane B (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. J Personal Soc Psychol 8:277–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DiSalvo C, Sengers P, Brynjarsdttir H (2010), Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In: Proc. of (CHI’10). ACM, pp 1975–1984Google Scholar
  19. Efficiency Energy, Energy Renewable (2008) Energy efficiency trends in residential and commercial buildings. In: Technical report, US, DoEGoogle Scholar
  20. EU-Comission (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Technical report, European Comission.
  21. Farber D (2012) CNET news: twitter hits 400 million tweets per day, mostly mobile. Accessed 30 Sep 2014
  22. Fischer C (2008) Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? J Energy Effic 1(1):79–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fogg BJ (2003) Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity. doi: 10.1145/764008.763957
  24. Fogg BJ (2009) A behavior model for persuasive design. In: Proc. of PERSUASIVE’09. Springer, Berlin, pp 40–1407Google Scholar
  25. Foster D, Lawson S, Blythe M, Cairns P (2010) Wattsup?: motivating reductions in domestic energy consumption using social networks. In: Proc. NordiCHI’10. ACM, pp 178–187Google Scholar
  26. Foster D, Lawson S, Wardman J, Blythe M, Linehan C (2012) “Watts in it for me?”: design implications for implementing effective energy interventions in organisations. In Proc. of CHI’12. ACM, pp 2357–2366. 978-1-4503-1015-4Google Scholar
  27. Froehlich J, Findlater L, Landay J (2010) The design of eco-feedback technology. In: Proc. of CHI’10. ACM, pp 1999–2008Google Scholar
  28. Gustafsson A, Gyllenswrd M (2005) The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display. In: EA of CHI’05. ACM, pp 1423–1426Google Scholar
  29. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. J Neural Netw 2:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jahn M, Schwartz T, Simon J, Jentsch M (2011) EnergyPULSE: tracking sustainable behavior in office environments. In: Proc. of e-Energy’11. ACM, pp 87–96Google Scholar
  31. Jönsson L, Broms L, Katzeff C (2010) Watt-Lite: energy statistics made tangible. In: Proc. of DIS’10. ACM, pp 240–243Google Scholar
  32. Khashei M, Bijari M (2010) An artificial neural network (p, d, q) model for timeseries forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 37:479–489CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. López-de-Armentia J, Casado-Mansilla D, López-de-Ipiña D (2014) Reducing energy waste through eco-aware every-day things. J Mob Inf Syst 10:79–103Google Scholar
  34. Nass C, Fogg BJ, Moon Y (1996) Can computers be teammates? Int J Hum-Comput Stud 45(6):669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pierce J, Paulos E (2012) Beyond energy monitors: interaction, energy, and emerging energy systems. In: Proc. of CHI’12. ACM, pp 665–674Google Scholar
  36. R-Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Accessed 19 June
  37. Schmidt A, Gellersen H-W, Beigl M (1999) Matching information and ambient media. In: Cooperative buildings. Integrating information, organizations, and architecture. Springer, Berlin, pp 140–149Google Scholar
  38. Schwartz T, Betz M, Ramirez L, Stevens G (2010) Sustainable energy practices at work: understanding the role of workers in energy conservation. In: Proc. of NordiCHI’10. ACM, pp 452–462Google Scholar
  39. Siero FW, Bakker AB, Dekker GB, Van-den-Burg MTC (1996) Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback. J Environ Psychol 16(3):235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Starik M, Marcus AA (2000) Introduction to the special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environment. J Acad Manag 43(4):539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thieme A, Comber R, Miebach J, Weeden J, Kraemer N, Lawson S, Olivier P (2012) We’ve bin watching you: designing for reflection and social persuasion to promote sustainable lifestyles. In: Proc. of CHI’12. ACM, pp 2337–2346Google Scholar
  42. Ventura D, Casado-Mansilla D, López-de-Armentia J, Garaizar P, Catania V, López-de-Ipiña D (2014) ARIIMA: a real IoT implementation of a machine-learning architecture for reducing energy consumption. In: Proc. of UCAm I’14, LNCSGoogle Scholar
  43. Winett RA, Neale MS, Grier HC (1979) Effects of self-monitoring and Feedback on Residential Electricity Consumption. J Appl Behav Anal 12(2):173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang R, Newman MW (2013) Learning from a learning thermostat: lessons for intelligent systems for the home. In: Proc. of UbiComp’13. ACM, pp 93–102Google Scholar
  45. Yun R, Lasternas B, Aziz A, Loftness V, Scupelli P, Rowe A, Kothari R, Marion F, Zhao J (2013b) Toward the design of a dashboard to promote environmentally sustainable behavior among office workers. In: Proc. of PERSUASIVE’13. Springer, Berlin, pp 246–252Google Scholar
  46. Yun R, Scupelli P, Aziz A, Loftness V (2013a) Sustainability in the workplace: nine intervention techniques for behavior change. In: Proc. of PERSUASIVE’13. Springer, Berlin, pp 253–265Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Casado-Mansilla
    • 1
  • Juan López-de-Armentia
    • 1
  • Daniela Ventura
    • 2
  • Pablo Garaizar
    • 1
  • Diego López-de-Ipiña
    • 1
  1. 1.Deusto Institute of Technology, DeustoTechUniversity of DeustoBilbaoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer EngineeringUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations