Soft Computing

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 1037–1050 | Cite as

Assessment of learning in environments interactive through fuzzy cognitive maps

  • Holman Bolívar Barón
  • Rubén González Crespo
  • Jordán Pascual Espada
  • Oscar Sanjuán Martínez
Methodologies and Application


Fuzzy cognitive maps have been applied in different areas to express the dynamic behavior of a set of related concepts. These maps are powerful tools for analysis and generate simulations in dynamic systems. Nowadays, individuals use a lot of different technological media: smart TV, Internet, video games, mobile phones, etc. Some of these media present new ways to play, express, learn and communicate. The use of multimedia has become popular in the education field, these multimedia techniques can allow students to get more entertainment, immersion, and interactivity. An interactive learning environment can provide useful information to analyze the student learning process. Information such as: when the student initiates and completes a task, time between interactions, number of attempts, sequence of decisions taken, results related to the aggregate of the group, etc. This research work presents a learning assessment system that uses multivariate analysis based on structural equation modeling and fuzzy cognitive maps as a tool. The main aim of the proposed system is to facilitate assessment of learning on interactive environments. To validate the proposal, we have performed an empirical evaluation. As a part of the evaluation, we apply a sequence of scenarios to stimulate cognitive function of planning in a child population. In this evaluation, it was observed that most practical tasks obtain better results, confirming the Hebb rule on learning and cellular neurophysiological relationship.


Intelligent assessment system Fuzzy cognitive map Interactive learning environments Game-based assessment 


  1. Aleven V, Vincent I, Roll B, Mclaren K, Koedinger K (2010) Automated, unobtrusive, action-by-action assessment of self-regulation during learning with an intelligent tutoring system. Educ Psychol 45(4):224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso S, Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2013) A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities. Appl Soft Comput 13(1):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ausubel DP (1968) Educational psychology: a cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker F, Kim S (2004) Item response theory: parameter estimation techniques. Marcel Dedder, New York (p 503)Google Scholar
  5. Barab S, Thomas M, Dodge T, Carteaux R, Tuzun H (2005) Making learning fun: quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educ Technol Res Dev 53(1):86–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrd D, Case K, Berg W (2011) Planning: fixed-foreperiod event-related potentials during the Tower of London task. Neuropsychologia 49(5):1024–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen C, Chen M (2009) Mobile formative assessment tool based on data mining techniques for supporting web-based learning. Computers Educón 52(1):256–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng C, Tzeng G (2011) Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):12168–12179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi B, Baek Y (2011) Exploring factors of media characteristic influencing flow in learning through virtual worlds. Proc Computers Educ 57(4):2382–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faiola A, Newlon C, Pfaff M, Smyslova O (2012) Correlating the effects of flow and telepresence in virtual worlds: enhancing our understanding of user behavior in game-based learning. Computers Hum Behav 29(3):1113–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreira-Satler M, Romero F, Menendez-Dominguez V, Zapata A, Prieto M (2012) Fuzzy ontologies-based user profiles applied to enhance e-learning activities. Soft Comput 16(7):1129–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freitas S, Oliver M (2006) How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Compters Educ 46(3):249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gartner Inc (2009) Gartner Hype cycle for education 2009. In: Proceedings of
  14. Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R (2009) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, London, p 816Google Scholar
  15. Havnes A, Smith K, Dysthe O, Ludvigsen K (2012) Formative assessment and feedback: making learning visible. Sutd Educ Eval 38(1):21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang Y, Backman S, Backman K, Moore D (2013) Exploring user acceptance of 3D virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing. Proc Tourism Manage 36:490–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ibañez M, Morillo D, Delgado C, Pérez D, Santos P, Hernández-Leo D (2010) Assessment in 3D virtual Worlds: QTI in Wonderland. In: Congreso Iberoamericano de Informática Educativa, Santiago de Chile, vol 1, pp 410–417Google Scholar
  18. Jarmon L, Traphagan T, Mayrath M, Trivedi A (2009) Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: an interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Proc Computers Educ 53(1):169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaller C, Unterrainer J, Rahm B, Halsband U (2004) The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task. Cognitive Brain Res 20(3):462–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Konar A, Jain L (2005) Cognitive engineering a distributed approach to machine intelligence. Springer, New York, p 353Google Scholar
  21. Kosko B (1986) Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Man Mach Stud 24(1):66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luo X, And Wei X (2010) Guided game-based learning using fuzzy cognitive maps. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 3(4):344–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miyake A, Naomi P, Friedman M (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent. Variable Anal Original Res Article Cogn Psychol 41(1):49–100Google Scholar
  24. Naim S, Hagras H (2013) A type 2-hesitation fuzzy logic based multi-criteria group decision making system for intelligent shared environments. Soft Comput 13(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. OECD (2011) Measuring improvements in learning outcomes: best practices to assess the value-added of schools. OECD Publishing, p 222Google Scholar
  26. Peláez E, Bowles J (1996) Using fuzzy cognitive maps as a system model for failure modes and effects analysis. Inf Sci 88(1–4):177–199Google Scholar
  27. Pérez IJ, Mezei J, Wikström R, Carlsson C, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) A new consensus model for GDM problems based on a fuzzy ontology. Soft Comput 17(9):1617–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reimann P, Kickmeier-Rust M, Albert D (2013) Problem solving learning environments and assessment: a knowledge space theory approach. Computers Educ 64:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rutter M, Maughan B (2002) School effectiveness findings 1979–2002. Proc J School Psychol 40(6):451–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shadish W (2001) Quasi-experimental designs. Int Encycl Soc Behav Sci 18:12655–12659Google Scholar
  31. Stach W, Kurgan L, Pedrycz W, Reformat M (2005) Genetic learning of fuzzy cognitive maps. J Fuzzy Sets Syst 153(3):371–401CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. Siu-Lung J, Chi-Wai R, Fang Y (2012) The effects of peer intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on MMOG game-based collaborative learning. Computers Hum Behav 28(5):1663–1669 Google Scholar
  33. Tugba S (2012) Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers Educ 18(1):154–161Google Scholar
  34. Wang Y (2003) Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Proc Inf Manage 41(1):75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiliam D (2011) What is assessment for learning? Stud Educ Eval 37:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holman Bolívar Barón
    • 1
  • Rubén González Crespo
    • 2
  • Jordán Pascual Espada
    • 2
  • Oscar Sanjuán Martínez
    • 2
  1. 1.Engineering FacultyCatholic University of ColombiaBogotá D.CColombia
  2. 2.College of EngineeringUniversidad Internacional de La RiojaMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations