Soft Computing

, Volume 18, Issue 9, pp 1659–1674 | Cite as

A soft computing based location-aware access control for smart buildings

  • José L. Hernández
  • M. Victoria Moreno
  • Antonio J. Jara
  • Antonio F. Skarmeta
Focus

Abstract

The evolution of wireless communications and pervasive computing is transforming current physical spaces into real smart environments. These emerging scenarios are expected to be composed by a potentially huge amount of heterogeneous smart objects which can be remotely accessed by users via their mobile devices anytime, anywhere. In this paper, we propose a distributed location-aware access control mechanism and its application in the smart building context. Our approach is based on an access control engine embedded into smart objects, which are responsible to make authorization decisions by considering both user location data and access credentials. User location data are estimated using a novel indoor localization system based on magnetic field data sent by user through her personal phone. This localization system implements a combination of soft computing techniques over the data collected by smartphones. Therefore, our location-aware access control mechanism does not require any intermediate entity, providing the benefits of a decentralized approach for smart environments. From the results obtained, we can consider our proposal as a promising approach to tackle the challenging security requirements of typical pervasive environments.

Keywords

Internet of things Smart buildings Indoor localization Security services Distributed access control  Capability 

References

  1. Altun K, Barshan B (2010) Human activity recognition using inertial/magnetic sensor units. In: Human behavior understanding, pp 38–51. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreu J, Angelov P (2010) Real-time human activity recognition from wireless sensors using evolving fuzzy systems. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ). IEEE, New York, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  3. Angermann M, Frassl M, Doniec M, Julian BJ, Robertson P (2012) Characterization of the indoor magnetic field for applications in localization and mapping. In: 2012 International conference on indoor positioning and indoor navigation (IPIN). IEEE, New York, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  4. Ardagna CA, Cremonini M, Damiani E, di Vimercati SDC, Samarati P (2006) Supporting location-based conditions in access control policies. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on information, computer and communications security. ACM, New York, pp 212–222Google Scholar
  5. Atallah L, Lo B, King R, Yang GZ (2010) Sensor placement for activity detection using wearable accelerometers. In: 2010 International conference on body sensor networks (BSN). IEEE, New York, pp 24–29Google Scholar
  6. Atallah L, Lo B, King R, Yang GZ (2011) Sensor positioning for activity recognition using wearable accelerometers. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 5(4):320–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Bao L, Intille SS (2004) Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In: Pervasive computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  9. Boles LC, Lohmann KJ (2003) True navigation and magnetic maps in spiny lobsters. Nature 421(6918):60–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24(2):123–140MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Covington MJ, Long W, Srinivasan S, Dev AK, Ahamad M, Abowd GD (2001) Securing context-aware applications using environment roles. In: Proceedings of the sixth ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM, New York, pp 10–20Google Scholar
  13. Denning DE, MacDoran PF (1996) Location-based authentication: grounding cyberspace for better security. Comput Fraud Secur 1996(2):12–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ebinger P, Ramos JLH, Kikiras P, Lischka M, Wiesmaier A (2013) Privacy in smart metering ecosystems. In: Smart grid security. Springer, Berlin, pp 120–131Google Scholar
  15. Ferraiolo D, Cugini J, Kuhn R (1995) Role-based access control (RBAC): features and motivations. In: Proceedings of 11th annual computer security application conference, pp 241–48Google Scholar
  16. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2000) Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). Ann Stat 28(2):337–407CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao C, Yu Z, Wei Y, Russell S, Guan Y (2009) A statistical indoor localization method for supporting location-based access control. Mob Netw Appl 14(2):253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garcia-Valverde T, Garcia-Sola A, Hagras H, Dooley JA, Callaghan V, Botia JA (2013) A fuzzy logic-based system for indoor localization using WiFi in ambient intelligent environments. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21(4):702–718Google Scholar
  19. Gozick B, Subbu KP, Dantu R, Maeshiro T (2011) Magnetic maps for indoor navigation. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 60(12):3883–3891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta SK, Mukheriee T, Venkatasubramanian K, Taylor T (2006) Proximity based access control in smart-emergency departments. In: Fourth annual IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops, 2006. PerCom Workshops 2006. IEEE, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Győrbíró N, Fábián Á, Hományi G (2009) An activity recognition system for mobile phones. Mob Netw Appl 14(1):82–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haverinen J, Kemppainen A (2009) Global indoor self-localization based on the ambient magnetic field. Robot Auton Syst 57(10):1028–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hernández-Ramos J et al (2013) Distributed capability-based access control for the internet of things. J Internet Serv Inf Secur 3(3/4): 1–16Google Scholar
  24. Kanungo T, Mount DM, Netanyahu NS, Piatko CD, Silverman R, Wu AY (2002) An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: Analysis and implementation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24(7):881–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katzakis N, Hori M (2009) Mobile phones as 3-dof controllers: a comparative study. In: DASC’09. Eighth IEEE international conference on dependable, autonomic and secure computing, 2009. IEEE, New York, pp 345–349Google Scholar
  26. Kim JE, Boulos G, Yackovich J, Barth T, Beckel C, Mosse D (2012) Seamless integration of heterogeneous devices and access control in smart homes. In: 2012 8th International conference on intelligent environments (IE). IEEE, New York, pp 206–213Google Scholar
  27. Kunze K, Lukowicz P, Junker H, Tröster G (2005) Where am I: Recognizing on-body positions of wearable sensors. In: Location-and context-awareness, pp 264–275 Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. Lane ND, Miluzzo E, Lu H, Peebles D, Choudhury T, Campbell AT (2010) A survey of mobile phone sensing. IEEE Commun Mag 48(9):140–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li B, Gallagher T, Dempster AG, Rizos C (2012) How feasible is the use of magnetic field alone for indoor positioning? In: 2012 International conference on indoor positioning and indoor navigation (IPIN). IEEE, New York, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  30. Luna F, Estébanez C, León C, Chaves-González JM, Nebro AJ, Aler R, Segura C, Vega-Rodríguez MA, Alba E, Valls JM et al (2011) Optimization algorithms for large-scale real-world instances of the frequency assignment problem. Soft Comput 15(5):975–990Google Scholar
  31. Luoh L (2014) ZigBee-based intelligent indoor positioning system soft computing. Soft Comput 18:443–456Google Scholar
  32. McGregor A, Hall M, Lorier P, Brunskill J (2004) Flow clustering using machine learning techniques. In: Passive and active network measurement. Springer, Berlin, pp 205–214Google Scholar
  33. Melville P, Mooney RJ (2005) Creating diversity in ensembles using artificial data. Inf Fusion 6(1):99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Misra P, Enge P (1999) Special issue on global positioning system. Proc IEEE 87(1):3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moses T et al (2005) Extensible access control markup language (XACML) version 2.0. Oasis Standard 200502Google Scholar
  36. Mulligan G (2007) The 6lowpan architecture. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on embedded networked sensors. ACM, New York, pp 78–82Google Scholar
  37. Ni L, Liu Y, Lau Y, Patil A (2004) LANDMARC: indoor location sensing using active RFID. Wirel Netw 10(6):701–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ofstad A, Nicholas E, Szcodronski R, Choudhury RR (2008) AAMPL: accelerometer augmented mobile phone localization. In: Proceedings of the first ACM international workshop on mobile entity localization and tracking in GPS-less environments. ACM, New York, pp 13–18 Google Scholar
  39. Oliveira LM, Rodrigues JJ, Sousa AF, Lloret J (2013a) Denial of service mitigation approach for IPv6-enabled smart object networks. Concurr Comput Pract Exp 25(1):129–142Google Scholar
  40. Oliveira LM, Rodrigues JJ, de Sousa AF, Lloret J (2013b) A network access control framework for 6LoWPAN networks. Sensors 13(1):1210–1230Google Scholar
  41. Ravi N, Dandekar N, Mysore P, Littman ML (2005) Activity recognition from accelerometer data. AAAI, Pittsburgh, pp 1541–1546Google Scholar
  42. Rodriguez MD, Favela J, Martínez EA, Muñoz MA (2004) Location-aware access to hospital information and services. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 8(4):448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shelby Z, Hartke K, Bormann C (2013) Constrained application protocol (CoAP). Constrained resources (CoRE) working group, internet engineering task force (IETF), work in progress, draft-ietf-core-coap-18. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-18
  44. Shi Y, Shi Y, Liu J (2011) A rotation based method for detecting on-body positions of mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on ubiquitous computing. ACM, New York, pp 559–560Google Scholar
  45. Simon H (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun M, Hill J (1993) A method for measuring mechanical work and work efficiency during human activities. J Biomech 26(3):229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang Y, Zhao J, Fukushima T (2009) Lock: a highly accurate, easy-to-use location-based access control system. In: Location and context awareness. Springer, Berlin, pp 254–270Google Scholar
  48. Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st century. Sci Am 265(3):94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xin-fang Z, Ming-wei F, Jun-jun W (2011) An indoor location-based access control system by RFID. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on cyber technology in automation, control, and intelligent systems (CYBER). IEEE, New York, pp 43–47Google Scholar
  50. Yang J (2009) Toward physical activity diary: motion recognition using simple acceleration features with mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on interactive multimedia for consumer electronics. ACM, New York, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  51. Yuan E, Tong J (2005) Attributed based access control (ABAC) for web services. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international conference on web services (ICWS), Orlando, USA. IEEE, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Zadeh LA (1997) What is soft computing? Soft Comput 1(1):1–1sGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • José L. Hernández
    • 1
  • M. Victoria Moreno
    • 1
  • Antonio J. Jara
    • 2
  • Antonio F. Skarmeta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Communications EngineeringUniversity of MurciaMurciaSpain
  2. 2.Institute of Information SystemsUniversity of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO)SierreSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations