Soft Computing

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 571–578 | Cite as

An intelligent biological inspired evolutionary algorithm for the suppression of incubator interference in premature infants ECG

Methodologies and Application


Electromagnetic interference produced by the incubator medical equipments may interrupt or degrade the premature infant’s electrocardiography (ECG) signal. The premature infant’s ECG is usually contaminated by an interference caused by the incubator devices. The interference cancellation system is designed using an adaptive learning ability of artificial neural network Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm. In this paper the swarm intelligent-LM algorithm is used for the electromagnetic interference cancellation in infant ECG signal. The swarm intelligent algorithm is used for the optimization by selecting the optimized number of neurons in the hidden layer, learning rate and momentum factor of the neural network. Also, this paper presents a comparison of residual mean square error (RMSE) values for neural network trained by LM algorithm, hybrid genetic-LM algorithm and hybrid swarm intelligent-LM algorithm. The LM algorithm is used for the weight updating and reducing the content of electromagnetic interference noise present in the signal. The performance analysis of the proposed noise cancellation approach is compared with gradient based and evolutionary based algorithms. The result analysis shows that the interferences in infant ECG signal is removed successfully using the proposed approach.


Genetic algorithm Infant incubator Electromagnetic interferences Infant ECG signal Swarm intelligent Artificial neural network Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm 


  1. Acampora G, Lee C-S, Vitiello A, Wang M-H (2012) Evaluating cardiac health through semantic soft computing techniques. Soft Comput 16(7):1165–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bearer CF (1994) Electromagnetic fields and infant incubators. Arch Environ Health 49:352–354Google Scholar
  3. Beligiannis GN, Skarlas LV, Likothanassis SD, Perdikouri D (2005) Nonlinear model structure identification of complex biomedical data using a genetic programming based technique. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 54(6):2184–2190Google Scholar
  4. Chang C-Y, Chen D-R (2010) Active noise cancellation without secondary path identification by using an adaptive Genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 59(9):2315–2327CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Das DP, Panda G (2004) Active mitigation of nonlinear noise processes using a novel filtered-s LMS algorithm. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 12(3):313–322Google Scholar
  6. El-Dahshan El-Sayed A (2011) Genetic algorithm and wavelet hybrid scheme for ECG signal denoising. Telecommun Syst 46(3):209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Etzel RA, Balk SJ, Bearer CF, Miller MD, Shea KM (1997) Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn. Pediatrics 100(4):724–727 Google Scholar
  8. Gothwal H, Kedawat S, Kumar R (2011) Cardiac arrhythmias detection in an ECG beat signal using fast Fourier transform and artificial neural network. J Biomed Sci Eng 4(4):289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamilton PS (1996) A comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive filters for reduction of power line interference in the EGG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43(1):105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krukowicz T (2010) Active noise control algorithm based on a neural network and input-output system identification model. J Arch Acoust 35(2):191–202Google Scholar
  11. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proc IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw 4:1942–1948Google Scholar
  12. Liu L, Gujjula S, Thanigai P, Kuo SM (2008) Still in womb: intrauterine acoustic embedded active noise control for infant incubators. In: Advances in Acoustics and Vibration. Hindawi publishing Corporation (article ID 495317)Google Scholar
  13. Lin YD, Hu YH (2008) Powerline interference detection and suppression in ECG signal processing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(1):354–357Google Scholar
  14. Martennns SMM, Mishi M, Oei SG, Bergmans JWM (2006) An improved adaptive powerline interference canceller for electrocardiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(11):2220–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ngia LSH, Sjoberg J (2000) Efficient training of neural nets for non linear adaptive filtering using a recursive Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Signal process 48(7):1915–1927CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Rout NK, Das DP, Panda G (2012) Particle swarm optimization based active noise control algorithm without secondary path identification. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 61(2):554–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Russo F, Sicuranza GL (2007) Accuracy and performance evaluation in the genetic optimization of nonlinear systems for active noise control. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 56(4):1443–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thanigai P, Kuo SM, Yenduri R (2007) Nonlinear active noise control for infant incubators in neo-natal intensive care units. Proc IEEEICASSP 1:109–112Google Scholar
  19. Tang KS, Man KF, Kwong S, He Q (1996) Genetic algorithms and their applications. IEEE Signal Process 13(6):22–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thakar NV, Zhu YS (1998) Applications of adaptive filtereing to ECG analysis: noise cancellation and arrhythmia detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 38(8):785–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Widrow B, Clover J, McCool JM, Kaunitz J, Williams CS, Hearn RH, Zeidler JR, Goodlin EDR (1975) Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications. Proc IEEE 63:1692–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Waseem K, Javed A, Ramzan R, Farooq M (2011) Using evolutionary algorithms for ECG Arrhythmia detection and classification. Natural Computation (ICNC), 2011 Seventh International Conference 4:2386–2390Google Scholar
  23. Zhang X-P (2001) Thresholding neural network for adaptive noise reduction. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 12(3):567–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ziarani AK (2002) A nonlinear adaptive method of elimination of powerline interference in ECG signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49(6):540–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringUdaya School of EngineeringVellamodiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringAnna UniversityTiruchirapalliIndia

Personalised recommendations