Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks
- 1.5k Downloads
Two processes are necessary to solve group decision making problems: a consensus process and a selection process. The consensus process is necessary to obtain a final solution with a certain level of agreement between the experts, while the selection process is necessary to obtain such a final solution. Clearly, it is preferable that the set of experts reach a high degree of consensus before applying the selection process. In order to measure the degree of consensus, different approaches have been proposed. For example, we can use hard consensus measures, which vary between 0 (no consensus or partial consensus) and 1 (full consensus), or soft consensus measures, which assess the consensus degree in a more flexible way. The aim of this paper is to analyze the different consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making problems and discuss their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally, we study the future trends.
KeywordsGroup decision making Consensus process Soft consensus measures Future trends
This paper has been developed with the financing of the SAINFOWEB project (TIC00602), Feder Funds in FUZZYLING project (TIN2007-61079) and PETRI project (PET 2007-0460).
- Bezdek J, Spillman B, Spillman R (1977) Fuzzy measures of preferences and consensus in group decision making. In: Proceedings of 1977 IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1303–1309Google Scholar
- Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attributive decision making: theory and its applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Kacprzyk J (1987) On some fuzzy cores and soft consensus measures in group decision making. In: Bezdek J (ed) The analysis of fuzzy information. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 119–130Google Scholar
- Spillman B, Spillman R, Bezdek J (1980) A fuzzy analysis of consensus in small groups. In: Wang PP, Chang SK (eds) Fuzzy automata and decision processes. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 331–356Google Scholar