Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 11, Issue 9, pp 889–900 | Cite as

Merits and limitations of using fuzzy inference system for temporal integration of INS/GPS in vehicular navigation

  • Rashad Sharaf
  • Mahmoud Reda TahaEmail author
  • Mohammed Tarbouchi
  • Aboelmagd Noureldin
Original Paper

Abstract

Most of the present vehicular navigation systems rely on global positioning system (GPS) combined with inertial navigation system (INS) for reliable determination of the vehicle position and heading. Integrating both systems provide several advantages and eliminate their individual shortcomings. Kalman filter (KF) has been widely used to fuse data from both systems. However, KF-based integration techniques suffer from several limitations related to its immunity to noise, observability and the necessity of accurate stochastic models of sensor random errors. This article investigates the potential use of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for temporal integration of INS/GPS in vehicular navigation. An ANFIS-based module named “P–δP” is designed, developed, implemented and tested for fusing INS and GPS position information. The fusion process aims at providing continuous correction of INS position to prevent its long-term growth using GPS position updates. In addition, it provides reliable prediction of the vehicle position during GPS outages. The P–δP module was examined using real navigation system data compromising an Ashtech Z12 GPS receiver and a Honeywell LRF-III INS. The proposed module proved to be successful as a modeless and platform independent module that does not require a priori knowledge of the navigation equipment utilized. Limitations of the ANFIS module are also discussed.

Keywords

Fuzzy systems Inertial navigation Data fusion Positioning systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown RG, Hwang PYC (1992) Introduction to random signals. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bshouty NH, Burroughs L (2005) Maximizing agreements with one-sided error with applications to Heuristic learning. Mach Learn 59 (1–2):99–123zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiang K-W, Noureldin A, El-Sheimy N (2006) The utilization of artificial neural networks for multi-sensor system integration in navigation and positioning instruments: IEEE Trans Instrum Measure 55(5).Google Scholar
  4. Deb K, Gupta H (2005) Searching for robust pareto-optimal solutions in multi-objective Optimization. In: Proceedings of third international conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization CAC Coello, AH, Aguirre, E, Zitzler (eds), Guanajuato, Mexico, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3410, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. El-Sheimy N (1996) The development of VISAT - a mobile survey system for GIS applications. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geomatics Engineering, The University of Calgary, UCGE Report No. 20101Google Scholar
  6. El-Sheimy N, Schwarz KP (1994) Integrating differential GPS receivers with an inertial navigation system (INS) and CCD cameras for a mobile GIS data collection system. In: ISPRS94, Ottawa, Canada, pp 241–248Google Scholar
  7. Farrell J (1998) The global positioning system and inertial navigation. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Hargrave PJ (1989) A tutorial introduction to Kalman filtering. IEE colloquium on Kalman filters: introduction, applications and future developments, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  9. Hostetler L, Andreas R (1983) Nonlinear Kalman filtering techniques for terrain-aided navigation. IEEE Trans Automatic Control 28(3): 315–323zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IEEE standard 647(1995) IEEE standard specification formal guide and test procedure for single-axis laser gyrosGoogle Scholar
  11. Lobo J, Lucas P, Dias J, Traca de Almeida A (1995) Inertial navigation system for mobile land vehicles. In: Proceedings IEEE international symposion on industrial electronics ISIE ’95, Vol. 2, pp 843–848Google Scholar
  12. Jang JSR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Jang JSR, Sun CT, Mizutani E (1997) Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing, a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  14. Klir G, Yaun B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Laviolette M, Seaman JW, Barrett JD, Woodall WH (1995) A probabilistic and statistical view of fuzzy methods. Technometrics 37:249–261zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mynbaev DK (1994) Errors of an inertial navigation unit caused by ring laser gyros errors In: IEEE position location and navigation symposium, pp 833–838Google Scholar
  17. Nassar S, Noureldin A, El-Sheimy N (2004) Improving positioning accuracy during kinematic DGPS outage periods using SINS/DGPS integration and SINS data de-noising. Surv Rev 37(292):426–438Google Scholar
  18. Noureldin A, El-Shafie A, Reda Taha M (2006) Optimizing neuro-fuzzy modules for data fusion of vehicular navigation systems using temporal cross-validation. In: Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol.19(7). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. Noureldin A, Osman A, El-Sheimy N (2004) A neuro-wavelet method for multi-sensor system integration for vehicular navigation. J Measure Sci Technol 15(2):404–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Noureldin A, Irvine-Halliday D, Mintchev MP (2002) Accuracy limitations of FOG-based continuous measurement-while-drilling surveying instruments for horizontal wells. IEEE Trans Inst Measure 51(6): 1177–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Passino K, Yurkovich S (1998) Fuzzy control. Addison Wesley, CAGoogle Scholar
  22. Ross TJ (2004) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. Wiley West SussexGoogle Scholar
  23. Salychev O (1998) Inertial systems in navigation and geophysics Bauman MSTU Press, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  24. Scherzinger BM, Reid DB (1994) Modified strapdown inertial navigator error models. In: IEEE Position location and navigation Symposium, pp 426–430Google Scholar
  25. Singpurwalla ND, Booker JM (2004) Membership functions and probability measures of fuzzy sets. J Ame Stat Assoc 99 (467): 867–877CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. Vanicek P, Omerbasic M (1999) Does a navigation algorithm have to use Kalman filter?. Can Aeronaut Space J 45 (3)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rashad Sharaf
    • 1
  • Mahmoud Reda Taha
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mohammed Tarbouchi
    • 1
  • Aboelmagd Noureldin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringRoyal Military College of CanadaKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, MSC01 10701The University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations