Soft Computing

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 163–169

Neural network classification of late gamma band electroencephalogram features

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper investigates the feasibility of using neural network (NN) and late gamma band (LGB) electroencephalogram (EEG) features extracted from the brain to identify the individuality of subjects. The EEG signals were recorded using 61 active electrodes located on the scalp while the subjects perceived a single picture. LGB EEG signals occur with jittering latency of above 280 ms and are not time-locked to the triggering stimuli. Therefore, LGB EEG could only be computed from single trials of EEG signals and the common method of averaging across trials to remove undesired background EEG (i.e. noise) is not possible. Here, principal component analysis has been used to extract single trials of EEG signals. Zero phase Butterworth filter and Parseval’s time-frequency equivalence theorem were used to compute the LGB EEG features. These features were then classified by backpropagation and simplified fuzzy ARTMAP NNs into different categories that represent the individuality of the subjects. The results using a tenfold cross validation scheme gave a maximum classification of 97.33% when tested on 800 unseen LGB EEG features from 40 subjects. This pilot investigation showed that the method of identifying the individuality of subjects using NN classification of LGB EEG features is worth further study.

Keywords

Backpropagation Biometrics Electroencephalogram Late gamma band Principal component analysis Simplified fuzzy ARTMAP Subject identification 

References

  1. Basar E, Eroglu CB, Demiralp T, Schurman M (1995) Time and frequency analysis of the brain’s distributed gamma-band system. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 14(4):400–410Google Scholar
  2. Basar E, Eroglu CB, Karakas S, Schurman M (1999) Oscillatory brain theory: a new trend in neuroscience. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 18(3):56–66Google Scholar
  3. Biel L, Pettersson O, Philipson L, Wide P (2001) ECG analysis: a new approach in human identification. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 50(3):808–812Google Scholar
  4. Daugman J (1999) Recognizing persons by their iris patterns. In: Jain AK, Bolle R, Pankanti S (eds) Biometrics: personal identification in networked society. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  5. Duta N, Jain AK, Mardia KV (2002) Matching of Palmprints. Pattern Recognit Lett 23(4):477–485CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Jain AK, Ross A, Pankanti S (1999) A prototype hand geometry-based verification system. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on audio and video-based biometric person identification (AVBPA), pp 166–171Google Scholar
  7. Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Kasuba T (1993) Simplified Fuzzy ARTMAP. AI Expert 8(11):19–25Google Scholar
  9. Misulis KE (1994) Spehlmann’s evoked potential primer: visual, auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in clinical diagnosis. Butterworth-Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Palaniappan R, Raveendran P, Omatu S (2002) VEP Optimal channel selection using genetic algorithm for neural network classification of alcoholics. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13(2):486–491Google Scholar
  11. Pankanti S, Bolle RM, Jain A (2000) Biometrics: the future of identification. Special issue of IEEE computer on biometrics, pp 46–49Google Scholar
  12. Pankanti S, Prabhakar S, Jain AK (2002) On the individuality of fingerprints. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 24(8):1010–1025Google Scholar
  13. Paranjape RB, Mahovsky J, Benedicenti L, Koles Z (2001) The electroencephalogram as a biometric. In: Proceedings of Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering, vol 2, pp 1363–1366Google Scholar
  14. Poulos M, Rangoussi M, Chrissikopoulos V, Evangelou A (1999) Person identification based on parametric processing of the EEG. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE international conference on electronics, circuits and systems, vol 1. pp 283–286Google Scholar
  15. Rumelhart DE, McCelland JL (1986) Parallel distributed processing: exploration in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Samal A, Iyengar P (1992) Automatic recognition and analysis of human faces and facial expressions: a survey. Pattern Recognit 25(1):65–77Google Scholar
  17. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M (1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 6(2):174–215Google Scholar
  18. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Delpuech C, Pernier J (1996) Stimulus specificity of phased-locked and non-phase locked 40 Hz visual responses in human. J Neurosci 16(13):4240–4249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Delpuech C, Pernier J (1997) Oscillatory γ-band (30–70 Hz) activity induced by a visual search task in humans. J Neurosci 17(2):722–734Google Scholar
  20. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Peronnet F, Pernier J (1998) Induced γ-band activity during the delay of a visual short-term memory task in humans. J Neurosci 18(11):4244–4254Google Scholar
  21. Zhang XL, Begleiter H, Porjesz B, Litke A (1997) Electrophysiological evidence of memory impairment in alcoholic patients. Biol Psychiatry 42:1157–1171Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Information Science and TechnologyMultimedia UniversityMelakaMalaysia
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer ScienceUniversity of EssexColchesterUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations