Pollen wall development in mango (Mangifera indica L., Anacardiaceae)
The mango (Mangifera indica) is a woody perennial crop currently cultivated worldwide in regions with tropical and subtropical climates. Despite its importance, an essential process such as pollen development, and, specifically, cell wall composition that influences crosstalk between somatic cells and the male germline, is still poorly understood in this species and in the Anacardiaceae as a whole. A detailed understanding of this process is particularly important to know the effect of low temperatures during flowering on pollen development that can be a limiting factor for fertilization and fruit set. To fill this gap, we performed a thorough study on the cell wall composition during pollen development in mango. The results obtained reveal a clear differentiation of the cell wall composition of the male germline by pectins, AGPs and extensins from the early developmental stages during microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis reflecting a restricted communication between the male germline and the surrounding somatic cells that is very sensitive to low temperatures. The combination of the results obtained provides an integrated study on cell wall composition of the male germline in mango that reveals the crucial role of the sporophyte and the gametophyte and the vulnerability of the process to low temperatures.
KeywordsAnacardiaceae Cell wall Low temperature Mangifera indica Mango Pollen development
Author contribution statement
JL and JIH conceived and designed the study project. JL performed the experiments. JL and JIH wrote, reviewed and edited this manuscript.
This work was supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad—European Regional Development Fund, European Union (AGL2015-74071-JIN, AGL2016-77267-R). Distribution of the JIM antibodies used in this work was supported in part by NSF grants DBI-C421683 and RCN009281.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Blackmore S, Crane PR (1998) The evolution of apertures in the spores and pollen grains of Embryophytes. In: Owens JS, Rudall PJ (eds) Reproductive biology. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 159–182Google Scholar
- Coetzer LA, Oosthuyse SA, Wishart DL, Robbertse PJ (1995) Influence of pruning on the flower sex ratio in some mango cultivars. S Afr Mango Grow Assoc Yearb 15:26–30Google Scholar
- Copeland H (1959) The reproductive structure of Schinus molle (Anacardiaceae). Madroño 15:14–25Google Scholar
- D’Arcy WG (1996) Anthers and stamens and what they do. In: D’Arcy WG, Keating RC (eds) The anther: form, function, and phylogeny. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–25Google Scholar
- de Oliveira JMS, de Mariath JEA (2001) Anther and pollen development in Anacardium occidentale (Anacardiaceae) clone CP76. Phytomorphology 51:91–100Google Scholar
- FAO (2017) Agricultural data: FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QC. Accessed 20 Feb 2017
- Heslop-Harrison J (1975a) The adaptive significance of the exine. In: Ferguson JK, Muller J (eds) The evolutionary significance of the exine. Linnean Society of london, London, pp 27–37Google Scholar
- Kelkar S (1958) Embryology of rhus mysurensis heyne. J Indian Bot Soc 37:114–122Google Scholar
- Maheshwari P (1934) The Indian Mango. Curr Sci 3:97–98Google Scholar
- Mukherjee SK, Litz RE (2009) Introduction: botany and importance. In: Litz RE (ed) The mango: botany, production and uses. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–18Google Scholar
- Nothnagel E, Münster A, Majewska-Sawka A (2001) Arabinogalactan proteins in differentiation of gametes and somatic cells. In: Bohanec B (ed) Biotechnological approaches for utilization of gametic cells. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 237–246Google Scholar
- Singh U (1960) Studies in the fruit drop of mango (Mangifera indica L.) II. Nature and extent of fruit drop. Hortic Adv 4:142–154Google Scholar
- Srinivasachar D (1940) Morphological studies in the family Anacardiaceae. Half-Yearly J Mysore Univ Sect B Sci 1:83–91Google Scholar