Advertisement

Sexual Plant Reproduction

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Zygospore formation between homothallic and heterothallic strains of Closterium

  • Yuki TsuchikaneEmail author
  • Miki Tsuchiya
  • František Hindák
  • Hisayoshi Nozaki
  • Hiroyuki Sekimoto
Original Article

Abstract

Zygospore formation in different strains of the Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex was examined in this unicellular isogamous charophycean alga to shed light on gametic mating strains in this taxon, which is believed to share a close phylogenetic relationship with land plants. Zygospores typically form as a result of conjugation between mating-type plus (mt+) and mating-type minus (mt) cells during sexual reproduction in the heterothallic strain, similar to Chlamydomonas. However, within clonal cells, zygospores are formed within homothallic strains, and the majority of these zygospores originate as a result of conjugation of two recently divided sister gametangial cells derived from one vegetative cell. In this study, we analyzed conjugation of homothallic cells in the presence of phylogenetically closely related heterothallic cells to characterize the reproductive function of homothallic sister gametangial cells. The relative ratio of non-sister zygospores to sister zygospores increased in the presence of heterothallic mt+ cells, compared with that in the homothallic strain alone and in a coculture with mt cells. Heterothallic cells were surface labeled with calcofluor white, permitting fusions with homothallic cells to be identified and confirming the formation of hybrid zygospores between the homothallic cells and heterothallic mt+ cells. These results show that at least some of the homothallic gametangial cells possess heterothallic mt-like characters. This finding supports speculation that division of one vegetative cell into two sister gametangial cells is a segregative process capable of producing complementary mating types.

Keywords

Closterium Conjugation Homothallism Heterothallism Sexual reproduction Zygospore 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Syo Kato (University of Tsukuba) for his technical advice concerning vital staining. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (no. 23770093 to Y.T., nos. 20247032, 22405014, and 23657161 to HS) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan; a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Elucidating common mechanisms of allogeneic authentication” (no. 22112521 to HS) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan; a grant from the New Technology Development Foundation to HS; and a research grant (2009–2011) from the Institute for Fermentation, Osaka, Japan.

Supplementary material

497_2011_174_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (401 kb)
Fig. S1 Schematic illustration of the sister and non-sister zygospore formation processes. Sister zygospores originated as a result of the conjugation of two sister gametangial cells derived from one vegetative cell. The non-sister zygospore was formed between gametangial cells of separately adjoined individuals. (PDF 400 kb)
497_2011_174_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (423 kb)
Fig. S2 Effect of vital staining on zygospore formation. Non-stained mating-type plus (mt+) and non-stained mating-type minus (mt), stained mt+ and non-stained mt, non-stained mt+ and stained mt, and stained mt+ and stained mt were cocultured in MI medium, respectively, and the number of zygospores was counted. Vertical bars indicate SD (n = 3). Relative number of zygospores was calculated using the equation. Relative number of zygospores (%) = (number of zygospores X 2/number of cells) X 100. (PDF 424 kb)
497_2011_174_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (30 kb)
Fig. S3. Effect of mating-type plus (mt+) and mating-type minus (mt) cell ratio on the formation of hybrid zygospores. Homothallic cells were cocultured with either stained mt+ (a) or stained mt cells (b). After 72 h, the number of zygospores, hybrid zygospores, and cells were counted. Vertical bars indicate the SD (n = 3). (PDF 29 kb)

Movie S1. Movie of the homothallic cell conjugation test in the presence of heterothallic mating-type plus (mt+) cells. This movie shows 72 h of the conjugation process condensed to 28 s. Images were taken every 15 min (25.6 MB MPEG-1). (MPG 7,290 kb)

Movie S2. Movie of the homothallic cell conjugation test in the presence of heterothallic mating-type minus (mt) cells. This movie shows 72 h of the conjugation process condensed to 28 s. Images were taken every 15 min (19.3 MB MPEG-1). (MPG 7,470 kb)

Movie S3. Movie of the homothallic cell conjugation test. This movie shows 72 h of the conjugation process condensed to 28 s. Images were taken every 15 min (14.6 MB MPEG-1). (MPG 6,598 kb)

Movie S4. Movie of the heterothallic mating-type plus (mt+) and mating-type minus (mt) cell conjugation test. This movie shows 72 h of the conjugation process condensed to 28 s. Images were taken every 15 min (22.2 MB MPEG-1). (MPG 6,440 kb)

497_2011_174_MOESM8_ESM.pdf (46 kb)
Supplementary material 8 (PDF 46 kb)

References

  1. Akatsuka S, Sekimoto H, Iwai H, Fukumoto R, Fujii T (2003) Mucilage secretion regulated by sex pheromones in Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex. Plant Cell Physiol 44:1081–1087PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akatsuka S, Tsuchikane Y, Fukumoto R, Fujii T, Sekimoto H (2006) Physiological characterization of the sex pheromone protoplast-release-inducing protein from the Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex (Charophyta). Phycol Res 54:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belliveau DJ, Garbary DJ, McLachlan JL (1990) Effects of fluorescent brighteners on growth and morphology of the red alga Antithamnion kylinii. Stain Technol 65:303–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloomfield G, Skelton J, Ivens A, Tanaka Y, Kay RR (2010) Sex determination in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Science 330:1533–1536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denboh T, Ichimura T, Hendrayanti D, Coleman AW (2003) Closterium moniliferum-ehrenbergii (Charophyceae, chlorophyta) species complex viewed from the 1506 group I intron and ITS2 of nuclear rDNA. J Phycol 39:960–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 38:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferris PJ, Goodenough UW (1997) Mating type in Chlamydomonas is specified by mid, the minus-dominance gene. Genetics 146:859–869PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferris P, Olson BJSC, De Hoff PL, Douglass S, Casero D, Prochnik S, Geng S, Rai R, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Nishii I, Hamaji T, Nozaki H, Pellegrini M, Umen JG (2010) Evolution of an expanded sex-determining locus in Volvox. Science 328:351–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graham LE, Wilcox LW (2000) Algae. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamaji T, Ferris PJ, Coleman AW, Waffenschmidt S, Takahashi F, Nishii I, Nozaki H (2008) Identification of the minus-dominance gene ortholog in the mating-type locus of Gonium pectorale. Genetics 178:283–294Google Scholar
  11. Ichimura T (1971) Sexual cell division and conjugation-papilla formation in sexual reproduction of Closterium strigosum. In: Nishizawa K (ed) Proceedings of the 7th International seaweed symposium. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 208–214Google Scholar
  12. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasai F, Kawachi M, Erata M, Watanabe MM (2004) NIES-collection. List of strains. Microalgae and Protozoa, 7th edn. National Institute for Environmental Studies, TsukubaGoogle Scholar
  14. Katoh K, Toh H (2008) Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinf 9:286–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klix V, Nowrousian M, Ringelberg C, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC, Pöggeler S (2010) Functional characterization of MAT1–1-specific mating-type genes in the homothallic ascomycete Sordaria macrospora provides new insights into essential and nonessential sexual regulators. Eukaryot Cell 9:894–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lippert BE (1967) Sexual reproduction in Closterium moniliferum and Closterium ehrenbergii. J Phycol 3:182–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCourt RM, Delwiche CF, Karol KG (2004) Charophyte algae and land plant origins. Trends Ecol Evol 19:661–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nojiri T, Fujii T, Sekimoto H (1995) Purification and characterization of a novel sex pheromone that induces the release of another sex pheromone during sexual reproduction of the heterothallic Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex. Plant Cell Physiol 36:79–84Google Scholar
  19. Nozaki H, Mori T, Misumi O, Matsunaga S, Kuroiwa T (2006) Males evolved from the dominant isogametic mating type. Curr Biol 16:R1018–R1020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest 2.1. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  21. Pringsheim EG (1946) Pure cultures of algae. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruepp A, Zollner A, Maier D, Albermann K, Hani J, Mokrejs M, Tetko I, Güldener U, Mannhaupt G, Münsterkötter M, Mewes HW (2004) The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucl Acids Res 32:5539–5545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sekimoto H (2000) Intercellular communication during sexual reproduction of Closterium (Conjugatophyceae). J Plant Res 113:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sekimoto H (2002) Production and secretion of a biologically active Closterium sex pheromone by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Physiol Biochem 40:789–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sekimoto H (2005) Plant sex pheromones. In: Litwack G (ed) Vitam Horm. Academic Press, Elsevier, London, pp 457–478Google Scholar
  28. Sekimoto H, Satoh S, Fujii T (1990) Biochemical and physiological properties of a protein inducing protoplast release during conjugation in the Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex. Planta 182:348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sekimoto H, Sone Y, Fujii T (1994a) A cDNA encoding a 19-kilodalton subunit of protoplast-release-inducing protein from Closterium. Plant Physiol 105:447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sekimoto H, Sone Y, Fujii T (1994b) cDNA cloning of a 42-kilodalton subunit of protoplast-release-inducing protein from Closterium. Plant Physiol 104:1095–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sekimoto H, Sone Y, Fujii T (1994c) Regulation of expression of the genes for a sex pheromone by an inducer of the sex pheromone in the Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex. Planta 193:137–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sekimoto H, Fukumoto R, Dohmae N, Takio K, Fujii T, Kamiya Y (1998) Molecular cloning of a novel sex pheromone responsible for the release of a different sex pheromone in Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex. Plant Cell Physiol 39:1169–1175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sekimoto H, Tanabe Y, Tsuchikane Y, Shirosaki H, Fukuda H, Demura T, Ito M (2006) Gene expression profiling using cDNA microarray analysis of the sexual reproduction stage of the unicellular charophycean alga Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex. Plant Physiol 141:271–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsuchikane Y, Fukumoto R, Akatsuka S, Fujii T, Sekimoto H (2003) Sex pheromones that induce sexual cell division in the Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex (Charophyta). J Phycol 39:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsuchikane Y, Fujii T, Ito M, Sekimoto H (2005) A sex pheromone, protoplast release-inducing protein (PR-IP) inducer, induces sexual cell division and production of PR-IP in Closterium. Plant Cell Physiol 46:1472–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tsuchikane Y, Ito M, Sekimoto H (2008) Reproductive isolation by sex pheromones in the Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex (Zygnematales, Charophyceae). J Phycol 44:1197–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsuchikane Y, Kokubun Y, Sekimoto H (2010a) Characterization and molecular cloning of conjugation-regulating sex pheromones in homothallic Closterium. Plant Cell Physiol 51:1515–1523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsuchikane Y, Sato M, Ootaki T, Kokubun Y, Nozaki H, Ito M, Sekimoto H (2010b) Sexual processes and phylogenetic relationships of homothallic strain of the Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex (Zygnematales, Charophyceae). J Phycol 46:274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tsuchikane Y, Tsuchiya M, Kokubun Y, Abe J, Sekimoto H (2011) Conjugation processes of Penium margaritaceum (Zygnemophyceae, Charophyta). Phycol Res 59:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Watanabe MM (1977) Biosystematics in Closterium of sexual unicellular green algae and Calothrix and Spirulina of asexual filamentous blue-green algae, with special reference to the analyses of natural populations. Doctor of Sci thesis, University of Hokkaido, Japan, p 114Google Scholar
  43. Watanabe MM, Ichimura T (1978) Biosystematic studies of Closterium-peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex II. Reproductive isolation and morphological variation among several populations from Northern Kanto area in Japan. Bot Mag Tokyo 91:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuki Tsuchikane
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miki Tsuchiya
    • 1
  • František Hindák
    • 2
  • Hisayoshi Nozaki
    • 3
  • Hiroyuki Sekimoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Faculty of ScienceJapan Women’s UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Non-Vascular PlantsInstitute of Botany, Slovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia
  3. 3.Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of ScienceUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations