Sexual Plant Reproduction

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 73–85 | Cite as

Floral biology of Ziziphus mauritiana (Rhamnaceae)

  • Noemi Tel-ZurEmail author
  • Bert Schneider
Original Article


Floral development of the synchronous dichogamous species Ziziphus mauritiana, as followed by light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), was divided into 11 stages using a series of landmark events. Main cellular events happen synchronously in the female and the male structures, such as meiosis in micro- and macrosporocyte cells, tetrad microspore formation and appearance of the functional megaspore cell, and onset of embryo sac differentiation coinciding with mitosis in the microspores. The last stage was characterized by anthesis and continued development of the flower, beginning with anther dehiscence (male phase) and proceeding to the female phase, which was characterized by style elongation. Flowers exhibit synchronous protandrous dichogamy; anthesis takes place in the morning (group A, e.g., clone Q-29) and afternoon (group B, e.g., clone B5/4). Stigma receptivity started after the male phase and occurred synchronously and complementarily with pollen dispersal in the two clones. Pollen viability and production were similar in the two clones, but the pollen diameter of Q-29 was significantly larger than that of B5/4. This study provides the basis for understanding the biological mechanisms regulating floral development, thus expanding the prospects for Z. mauritiana breeding programs and for further molecular and genetic studies of this species.


Floral organogenesis Protandrous Rhamnaceae Synchronous dichogamy 



The authors thank Mr. J. Mouyal and Ms. R. Jeger (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev) for their skillful technical assistance.


  1. Arndt SK, Clifford SC, Popp M (2001) Ziziphus—a multipurpose fruit tree in arid regions. In: Breckle SW, Veste M, Wucherer W (eds) Sustainable land-use in deserts. Springer, New York, pp 388–399Google Scholar
  2. Burd M (1994) Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot Rev 60:83–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chrovatia RS, Patel DS, Patel GV (1993) Performance of ber Ziziphus mauritiana (Lamk.) under arid conditions. Ann Arid Zones 32:215–217Google Scholar
  4. Clifford SC, Arndt SK, Corlett JE, Joshi S, Sankhla N, Popp M, Jones HG (1998) The role of solute accumulation, osmotic adjustment and changes in cell wall elasticity in drought tolerance in Ziziphus mauritiana (Lamk.). J Exp Bot 49:967–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cruden RW (1988) Temporal dioecism: systematic breadth, associated traits, and temporal patterns. Bot Gazette 149:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dafni A, Motte Manues M (1998) A rapid and simple procedure to determine stigma receptivity. Sex Plant Reprod 11:177–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desai UT, Randhawa DB, Wavhal KN (1986) Floral biology of ber. J Maharashtra Agric Univ 11:76–78Google Scholar
  8. Dupuis I, Dumas C (1990) Biochemical markers of female receptivity in maize (Zea mays L.) assessed using in vitro fertilization. Plant Sci 70:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galil J, Zeroni M (1967) On the pollination of Zizyphus spina-christi (L.) Willd. in Israel. Israel J Bot 16:71–77Google Scholar
  10. Godara NR (1980) Studies on floral biology and comparative behaviour in ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.). Ph.D. thesis, HAU, HisarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gonzalez MV, Coque M, Herrero M (1995) Papillar integrity as an indicator of stigmatic receptivity in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). J Exp Bot 46:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrero M, Dickinson HG (1979) Pollen–pistil incompatibility in Petunia hybrida—changes in the pistil following compatible and incompatible intraspecific crosses. J Cell Sci 36:1–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y (1970) Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence: intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain Technol 45:115–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Islam MB, Simmons MP (2006) A thorny dilemma: testing alternative intrageneric classifications within Ziziphus (Rhamnaceae). Syst Bot 31:826–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Issarakraisila M, Considine JA (1994) Effects of temperature on pollen viability in mango cv. “Kensington”. Ann Bot 73:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson D (1991) In situ hybridization in plants. In: Bowles DJ, Gurr SJ, McPherson M (eds) Molecular plant pathology: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–174Google Scholar
  17. Jawanda JS, Bal JS (1978) The ber, highly paying and rich in food value. Indian Hort, Oct–Dec, 19–21Google Scholar
  18. Josan JS, Jawanda JS, Bal JS, Singh R (1980) Studies on the floral biology of ber. Flowering habit, flower bud development, time and duration of flowering, floral morphology, time of anthesis and dehiscence. Punjab Hort J 20:156–161Google Scholar
  19. Khoshoo TN, Singh N (1963) Cytology for North-Western Indian trees. Ziziphus jujube and Z. rotundifolia. Silvae Genet 12:141–180Google Scholar
  20. Lichtenzveig J, Abbo S, Nerd A, Tel-Zur N, Mizrahi Y (2000) Cytology and mating systems in the climbing cacti Hylocereus and Selenicereus. Am J Bot 87:1058–1065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lobreau-Callen D (1976) Ultrastructure de l’exine de quelques pollens des Celastrales et des groupes voisins. Adansonia 16:83–92Google Scholar
  22. Machuweti M, Zenda G, Ndhlala AR, Kasiyamhuru A (2005) Sugars, organic acid and phenolic compounds of Ziziphus mauritiana fruits. Eur Food Res Technol 221:570–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McInnis SM, Emery DC, Porter R, Desikan R, Hancock JT, Hiscock SJ (2006) The role of stigma peroxidase in flowering plants: insights from further characterization of a stigma-specific peroxidase (SSP) from Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae). J Exp Bot 57:1835–1846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Medan D, Aagesen L (1995) Comparative flower and fruit structure in the Colletieae (Rhamnaceae). Bot Jahrb Syst 117:531–564Google Scholar
  25. Medan D, Hilger HH (1992) Comparative flower and fruit morphogenesis in Columbrina (Rhamnaceae) with special reference to C. asiatica. Am J Bot 79:809–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mishra RM, Gupta P, Yadav GP (2004) Intensity and diversity of flower-visiting in relation to plant density of Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk. Trop Ecol 45:263–270Google Scholar
  27. Mizrahi Y, Nerd A (1996) New crops as a possible solution for the troubled Israeli export market. In: Janick J (ed) Progress in new crops. ASHS Press, Alexandria, pp 37–45Google Scholar
  28. Narbona E, Ortiz PL, Arista M (2005) Dichogamy and sexual dimorphism in floral traits in the andromonoecious Euphorbia boetica. Ann Bot 95:779–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nasri-Ayachi MB, Nabli MA (1995) Pollen wall ultrastructure and ontogeny in Ziziphus lotus L. (Rhamnaceae). Rev Palaeobot Palynol 85:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pareek OP (1997) Indian jujube. In: 50 years of crop science research in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research Publication, pp 557–565Google Scholar
  31. Pareek OP (2001) Fruit for the future 2: ber. In: International Center for Underutilized Crops. Redwood Books, Wiltshire, pp 42–58Google Scholar
  32. Renner SS (2001) How common is heterodichogamy? Trends Ecol Evol 16:595–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roulston T, Cane JH, Buchmann SL (2000) What governs protein content of pollen: pollinator preferences, pollen–pistil interactions, or phylogeny? Ecol Monogr 70:617–643Google Scholar
  34. Rusin SE (1999) Plant microtechnique and microscopy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Sattler R (1973) Organogenesis of flowers, a photographic text-atlas. University of Toronto Press, Toronto and BuffaloGoogle Scholar
  36. Stone JL, Thomson JD, Dent-Acosta SJ (1995) Assessment of pollen viability in hand-pollination experiments: a review. Am J Bot 82:1186–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vashishtha BB, Pareek OP (1979) Flower morphology, fruit set and fruit drop in some ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars. Ann Arid Zones 18:165–169Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.A. Katz Department of Dryland Biotechnologies, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research (BIDR)Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (BGU)Sede-BoqerIsrael

Personalised recommendations