Sexual Plant Reproduction

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 51–62

Imaging the actin cytoskeleton in growing pollen tubes

  • Kathleen L. Wilsen
  • Alenka Lovy-Wheeler
  • Boris Voigt
  • Diedrik Menzel
  • Joseph G. Kunkel
  • Peter K. Hepler
Original Article


Given the importance of the actin cytoskeleton to pollen tube growth, we have attempted to decipher its structure, organization and dynamic changes in living, growing pollen tubes of Nicotiana tabacum and Lilium formosanum, using three different GFP-labeled actin-binding domains. Because the intricate structure of the actin cytoskeleton in rapidly frozen pollen tubes was recently resolved, we now have a clear standard against which to compare the quality of labeling produced by these GFP-labeled probes. While GFP-talin, GFP-ADF and GFP-fimbrin show various aspects of the actin cytoskeleton structure, each marker produces a characteristic pattern of labeling, and none reveals the entire spectrum of actin. Whereas GFP-ADF, and to a lesser extent GFP-talin, label the fringe of actin in the apex, no similar structure is observed with GFP-fimbrin. Further, GFP-ADF only occasionally labels actin cables in the shank of the pollen tube, whereas GFP-fimbrin labels an abundance of fine filaments in this region, and GFP-talin bundles actin into a central cable in the core of the pollen tube surrounded by a few finer elements. High levels of expression of GFP-talin and GFP-fimbrin frequently cause structural rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton of pollen tubes, and inhibit tip growth in a dose dependent manner. Most notably, GFP-talin results in thick cortical hoops of actin, transverse to the axis of growth, and GFP-fimbrin causes actin filaments to aggregate. Aberrations are seldom seen in pollen tubes expressing GFP-ADF. Although these markers are valuable tools to study the structure of the actin cytoskeleton of growing pollen tubes, given their ability to cause aberrations and to block pollen tube growth, we urge caution in their use.

Supplementary material (10.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (7.6 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (2.4 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (2.7 mb)
Supplementary material 4 (4.3 mb)
Supplementary material 5


  1. Allwood E, Anthony R, Smertenko A, Reichelt S, Drøbak B, Doonan J, Weeds A, Hussey P (2002) Regulation of the pollen-specific actin-depolymerizing factor LlADF1. Plant Cell 14:2915–2927. DOI 10.1105/tpc.005363Google Scholar
  2. Cárdenas L, Lovy-Wheeler A, Wilsen KL, Hepler PK (2005) Actin polymerization promotes the reversal of streaming in the apex of pollen tubes. Cell Motil Cytoskel 61:112–127. DOI 10.1002/cm.20068Google Scholar
  3. Chen CY, Wong EI, Vidali L, Estavillo A, Hepler PK, Wu HM, Cheung AY (2002) The regulation of actin organization by actin-depolymerizing factor in elongating pollen tubes. Plant Cell 14:2175–2190. DOI 10.1105/tpc.003038Google Scholar
  4. Feijó JA, Sainhas J, Hackett GR, Kunkel JG, Hepler PK (1999) Growing pollen tubes possess a constitutive alkaline band in the clear zone and a growth-dependent acidic tip. J Cell Biol 144:483–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Foissner I, Grolig F, Obermeyer G (2002) Reversible protein phosphorylation regulates the dynamic organization of the pollen tube cytoskeleton: effects of calyculin A and okadaic acid. Protoplasma 220:1–15. DOI 10.1007/s00709–002–0032–9Google Scholar
  6. Fu Y, Wu G, Yang Z (2001) Rop GFPase-dependent dynamics of tip-localized F-actin controls tip growth in pollen tubes. J Cell Biol 152:1019–1032. DOI 10.1083/jcb.152.5.1019Google Scholar
  7. Gibbon BC, Kovar DR, Staiger CJ (1999) Latrunculin B has different effects on pollen germination and tube growth. Plant Cell 11:2349–2363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamilton DA, Schwarz YH, Mascarenhas JP (1998) A monocot pollen-specific promoter contains separable pollen-specific and quantitative elements. Plant Mol Biol 38:663–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanein D, Matsudaira P, DeRosier DJ (1997) Evidence for a conformational change in actin induced by fimbrin (N375) binding. J Cell Biol 139:387–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hepler PK, Vidali L, Cheung AY (2001) Polarized cell growth in higher plants. Annu Rev Cell Devel Biol 17:159–187. DOI 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.159Google Scholar
  11. Holdaway-Clarke TL, Hepler PK (2003) Control of pollen tube growth: role of ion gradients and fluxes. New Phytol 159:539–563. DOI 10.1046/j.1469–8137.2003.00847.xGoogle Scholar
  12. Kandasamy MK, McKinney EC, Meagher RB (1999) The late pollen-specific actins in angiosperms. Plant J 18:681–691. DOI 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00487.xGoogle Scholar
  13. Ketelaar T, Anthony RG, Hussey PJ (2004a) Green fluorescent protein-mTalin causes defects in actin organization and cell expansion in Arabidopsis and inhibits actin depolymerizing protein’s actin depolymerizing activity in vitro. Plant Physiol 136:3990–3998. DOI 10.1104/pp.104.050799Google Scholar
  14. Ketelaar T, Allwood EG, Anthony R, Voigt B, Menzel D, Hussey PJ (2004b) The actin-interacting protein AIP1 is essential for actin organization and plant development. Curr Biol 14:145–149. DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.004Google Scholar
  15. Kost B, Spielhofer P, Chua NH (1998) A GFP-mouse talin fusion protein labels plant actin filaments in vivo and visualizes the actin cytoskeleton in growing pollen tubes. Plant J 16:393–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kovar DR, Staiger CJ, Weaver EA, McCurdy DW (2000) AtFim1 is an actin filament crosslinking protein from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 24:625–636. DOI 10.1046/j.1365–313x.2000.00907.xGoogle Scholar
  17. Kovar DR, Gibbon BC, McCurdy DW, Staiger CJ (2001) Fluorescently-labeled fimbrin decorates a dynamic actin filament network in live plant cells. Planta 213:390–395. DOI: 10.1007/s004250000494Google Scholar
  18. Kuhn T, Meberg P, Brown M, Bernstein B, Minamide L, Jensen J, Okada K, Soda E, Bamburg J (2000) Regulating actin dynamics in neuronal growth cones by ADF/cofilin and Rho family GTPases. J Neurobiol 44:126–144. DOI 10.1002/1097-4695(200008)44:2<126::AID-NEU4>3.0.CO;2-ZGoogle Scholar
  19. Laitiainen E, Nieminen KM, Vihinen H, Raudaskoski M (2002) Movement of generative cell and vegetative nucleus in tobacco pollen tubes is dependent on microtubule cytoskeleton but independent of the synthesis of callose plugs. Sex Plant Reprod 15:195–204. DOI 10.1007/s00497-002-0155-3Google Scholar
  20. Lee E, Shelden EA, Knecht DA (1998) Formation of F-actin aggregates in cells treated with actin stabilizing drugs. Cell Motil Cytoskelet 39:122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lovy-Wheeler A, Wilsen KL, Baskin TI, Hepler PK (2005) Enhanced fixation reveals an apical cortical fringe of actin filaments as a consistent feature of the pollen tube. Planta 221:95–104. DOI 10.1007/s00425-004-1423-2Google Scholar
  22. McCann RO, Craig SW (1997) The I/LWEQ module: a conserved sequence that signifies F-actin binding in functionally diverse proteins from yeast to mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:5679–5684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller DD, Lancelle SA, Hepler PK (1996) Actin microfilaments do not form a dense meshwork in Lilium longiflorum pollen tube tips. Protoplasma 195:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parton R, Fischer-Parton S, Watahiki M, Trewavas A (2001) Dynamics of the apical vesicle accumulation and the rate of growth are related in individual pollen tubes. J Cell Sci 114:2685–2695PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Parton R, Fischer-Parton S, Trewavas A, Watahiki MK (2003) Pollen tubes exhibit regular periodic membrane trafficking events in the absence of apical extension. J Cell Sci 116:2707–2719. DOI 10.1242/jcs.00468Google Scholar
  26. Sheahan M, Rose R, McCurdy D (2004a) Organelle inheritance in plant cell division: the actin cytoskeleton is required for unbiased inheritance of chloroplasts, mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum in dividing protoplasts. Plant J 37:379–390. DOI 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01967.xGoogle Scholar
  27. Sheahan M, Staiger CJ, Rose RJ, McCurdy DW (2004b) A green fluorescent protein fusion to actin-binding domain 2 of Arabidopsis fimbrin highlights new features of a dynamic actin cytoskeleton in live plant cells. Plant Physiol 136:3968–3978. DOI/10.1104/pp.104.049411Google Scholar
  28. Taylor LP, Hepler PK (1997) Pollen germination and tube growth. Ann Rev Plant Mol Biol 48:461–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tsien RY (1998) The green fluorescent protein. Annu Rev Biochem 67:509–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Twell D, Yamaguchi J, McCormick S (1990) Pollen-specific gene expression in transgenic plants: coordinate regulation of two different tomato gene promoters during microsporogenesis. Development 109:705–713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vidali L, McKenna ST, Hepler PK (2001) Actin polymerization is necessary for pollen tube growth. Mol Biol Cell 12:2534–2545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Voigt B, Timmers ACJ, Šamaj J, Müller J, Baluška F, Menzel D (2005) GFP-FAB2 fusion construct allows in vivo visualization of the dynamic actin cytoskeleton in all cells of Arabidopsis seedlings. Eur J Cell Biol 84:595–608. DOI 10.1016/j.ejcb.2004.11.011Google Scholar
  33. Wang YS, Motes CM, Mohamalawari DR, Blancaflor EB (2004) Green fluorescent protein fusions to Arabidopsis fimbrin 1 for spatio-temporal imaging of F-actin dynamics in roots. Cell Motil Cytoskelet 59:79–93. DOI 10.1002/cm.20024Google Scholar
  34. Weber I, Niewöhner J, Du A, Röhrig U, Gerisch G (2002) A talin fragment as an actin trap visualizing actin flow in chemotaxis, endocytosis, and cytokinesis. Cell Motil Cytoskelet 53:136–149. DOI 10.1002/cm.10065Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen L. Wilsen
    • 1
    • 4
  • Alenka Lovy-Wheeler
    • 1
  • Boris Voigt
    • 2
  • Diedrik Menzel
    • 2
  • Joseph G. Kunkel
    • 3
  • Peter K. Hepler
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Biology ProgramUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Institute of BotanyUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  3. 3.Biology DepartmentUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  4. 4.Biological SciencesUniversity of Northern ColoradoGreeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations