Abstract
A seagull in a graph is an induced three-vertex path. When does a graph G have k pairwise vertex-disjoint seagulls? This is NP-complete in general, but for graphs with no stable set of size three we give a complete solution. This case is of special interest because of a connection with Hadwiger’s conjecture which was the motivation for this research; and we deduce a unification and strengthening of two theorems of Blasiak [2] concerned with Hadwiger’s conjecture.
- •
|V (G)|≥3k
- •
G is k-connected
- •
for every clique C of G, if D denotes the set of vertices in V (G)\C that have both a neighbour and a non-neighbour in C then |D|+|V (G)\C|≥2k, and
- •
the complement graph of G has a matching with k edges.
We also address the analogous fractional and half-integral packing questions, and give a polynomial time algorithm to test whether there are k disjoint seagulls.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)
05C83 05C70Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]C. Berge: Sur le couplage maximum d’un graphe, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 247 (1958), 258–259.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- [2]J. Blasiak: A special case of Hadwiger’s conjecture, J. Combinatorial Theory, Ser. B, 97 (2007), 1056–1073.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]M. Chudnovsky, S.-I. Oum and P. Seymour: Finding minimum clique capacity, Combinatorics this issue.Google Scholar
- [4]D. Dor and M. Tarsi: Graph decomposition is NP-complete: A complete proof of Holyer’s conjecture, SIAM J. Comput. 26 (1997), 1166–1187.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]J. Edmonds: Matroid partition, in: Mathematics of the Decision Sciences Part 1 (Proceedings Fifth Summer Seminar on the Mathematics of the Decision Sciences, Stanford, California, 1967; G. B. Dantzig, A. F. Vienott, Jr. eds.) [Lectures in Applied Mathematics Vol.11], American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1968, 333–345.Google Scholar
- [6]H. Hadwiger: Über eine Klassifikation der Streckenkomplexe, Vierteljahrsschr. Naturforsch. Ges. Zürich 88 (1943), 133–142.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [7]M. D. Plummer, M. Stiebitz and B. Toft: On a special case of Hadwiger’s conjecture, Discuss. Math. Graph Theory 23 (2005), 333–363.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar