A pair of forbidden subgraphs and perfect matchings in graphs of high connectivity
- 132 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
Sumner [7] proved that every connected K 1,3-free graph of even order has a perfect matching. He also considered graphs of higher connectivity and proved that if m ≥ 2, every m-connected K 1,m+1-free graph of even order has a perfect matching. In [6], two of the present authors obtained a converse of sorts to Sumner’s result by asking what single graph one can forbid to force the existence of a perfect matching in an m-connected graph of even order and proved that a star is the only possibility. In [2], Fujita et al. extended this work by considering pairs of forbidden subgraphs which force the existence of a perfect matching in a connected graph of even order. But they did not settle the same problem for graphs of higher connectivity. In this paper, we give an answer to this problem. Together with the result in [2], a complete characterization of the pairs is given.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)
05C70Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]R.J. Faudree, R.J. Gould, M.S. Jacobson and L. Lesniak: Characterizing forbidden clawless triples implying Hamiltonian graphs, Discrete Math. 249 (2002), 71–81.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]S. Fujita, K. Kawarabayashi, C. L. Lucchesi, K. Ota, M. Plummer and A. Saito: A pair of forbidden subgraphs and perfect matchings, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 96 (2006), 315–324.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]J. Liu and H. Zhou: Graphs and digraphs with given girth and connectivity, Discrete Math. 132 (1994), 387–390.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]L. Lovász and M. D. Plummer: Matching Theory, Ann. Discrete Math., 29, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.Google Scholar
- [5]K. Ota and G. Sueiro: Forbidden induced subgraphs for perfect matching, manuscript, 2010.Google Scholar
- [6]M.D. Plummer and A. Saito: Forbidden subgraphs and bounds on the size of a maximum matching, J. Graph Theory 50 (2005), 1–12.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]D. Sumner: 1-factors and antifactor sets, J. London Math. Soc. 13 (1976), 351–359.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar