Abstract
This paper compares several methods for determining degree-day (°D) threshold temperatures from field observations. Three of the methods use the mean developmental period temperature and simple equations to estimate: (1) the smallest standard deviation in °D, (2) the least standard deviation in days, and (3) a linear regression intercept. Two additional methods use iterations of cumulative °D and threshold temperatures to determine the smallest root mean square error (RMSE). One of the iteration methods uses a linear model and the other uses a single triangle °D calculation method. The method giving the best results was verified by comparing observed and predicted phenological periods using 7 years of kiwifruit data and 10 years of cherry tree data. In general, the iteration method using the single triangle method to calculate °D provided threshold temperatures with the smallest RMSE values. However, the iteration method using a linear °D model also worked well. Simply using a threshold of zero gave predictions that were nearly as good as those obtained using the other two methods. The smallest standard deviation in °D performed the worst. The least standard deviation in days and the regression methods did well sometimes; however, the threshold temperatures were sometimes negative, which does not support the idea that development rates are related to heat units.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 26 May 1998 / Accepted: 28 October 1998
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Snyder, R., Spano, D., Cesaraccio, C. et al. Determining degree-day thresholds from field observations. Int J Biometeorol 42, 177–182 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004840050102
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004840050102