Advertisement

International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 62, Issue 10, pp 1873–1886 | Cite as

The influence of climatocultural background on outdoor thermal perception

  • Dmitry Brychkov
  • Yaakov Garb
  • David PearlmutterEmail author
Original Paper
  • 171 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which people with different past thermal experience and “climatocultural” history systematically report different outdoor thermal sensations and thermal comfort patterns. After constructing two distinct climatocultural groups co-inhabiting the research setting (native Israelis vs. representatives of colder regions), and comparing their relative thermal preferences in both short-term and long-term observational experiments, we confirmed the existence of a strong correlation between affiliation to a certain climatocultural group and outdoor thermal sensation. It was shown that the degree of this correlation was not a constant value, and the strength of the difference in thermal sensation between different groups might change subject to different environmental conditions and possibly expectations. Under some environmental conditions, i.e., stressful but not extreme, the differences may be accentuated, while under others, i.e., either comfortable or extremely stressful, the scope of difference may diminish. Short-term acclimation may to some extent offset the differences between separate climatocultural groups. The study also showed that the meaning of the thermal comfort scale itself may be perceived unevenly between representatives of different groups.

Keywords

Thermal adaptation Thermal perception Outdoor thermal comfort Climatocultural factors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Wolfgang Motzafi-Haller for his skill and knowledge in installing and maintaining the measuring equipment.

References

  1. Auliciems A (1981) Towards a psycho-physiological model of thermal perception. Int J Biometeorol 25:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brager GS, de Dear RJ (2003) Historical and cultural influences on comfort expectations. In: Cole R, Lorch R (eds) Buildings, culture and environment: informing local and global practices. Blackwell, London, pp 177–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan L, Binney W, Parker L, Aleti T, Nguyen D (2014) Social marketing and behaviour change: models, theory and applications. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne D, Callaghan G (2014) Complexity theory and the social sciences: the state of the art. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cena KM, Ladd PG, Spotila JR (1990) A practical approach to thermal comfort surveys in homes and offices: discussion of methods and concerns. ASHRAE Trans 96(1):853–857Google Scholar
  6. Chappells H, Shove E (2004) Comfort: a review of philosophies and paradigms. Future Comforts Project, UK ESRC programme. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/futcom/fc_litfinal1.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2017
  7. de Dear RJ (2010) Thermal comfort in natural ventilation – a neurophysiological hypothesis. In: Proceedings of Conference: Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 9–11 April 2010Google Scholar
  8. de Dear RJ (2011) Revisiting an old hypothesis of human thermal perception: alliesthesia. Build Res Inf 39(2):108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Dear RJ, Brager GS (1998) Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. ASHRAE Trans 104(1):145–167Google Scholar
  10. de Dear RJ, White S (2008) Residential air conditioning, thermal comfort and peak electricity demand management. In: Proceedings of Conference: Air Conditioning and the Low Carbon Cooling Challenge, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 27–29 July 2008Google Scholar
  11. Golany GS (1996) Urban design, morphology and thermal performance. Atmos Environ 30(3):455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gosling SN, Bryce EK, Dixon PG, Gabriel KMA, Gosling EY, Hanes JM, Hondula DM, Liang L, Mac-Lean PAB, Muthers S, Nascimento ST, Petralli M, Vanos JK, Wanka ER (2014) A glossary for biometeorology. Int J Biometeorol 58:277–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heschong L (1979) Thermal delight in architecture. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Höppe P (2002) Different aspects of assessing indoor and outdoor thermal comfort. Energ Build 34:661–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Humphreys MA (2008) Why did the piggy bark? Some effects of language and context on the interpretation of words used in scales of warmth and thermal preference. In: Proceedings of Conference: Air Conditioning and the Low Carbon Cooling Challenge, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 27–29 July 2008Google Scholar
  16. Humphreys M, Nicol F (1998) Understanding the adaptive approach to thermal comfort. ASHRAE Transactions, Symposia, pp 991–1004Google Scholar
  17. Indraganti M, Rao KD (2010) Effect of age, gender, economic group and tenure on thermal comfort: a field study in residential buildings in hot and dry climate with seasonal variations. Energ Build 42(3):273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenawy I, ElKadi H (2011) Diversity and thermal comfort in outdoor places. International Journal of Diversity in Organisations 11(1):237–248Google Scholar
  19. Knez I, Thorsson S (2006) Influences of culture and environmental attitude on thermal, emotional and perceptual evaluations of a public square. Int J Biometeorol 50:258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knez I, Thorsson S (2007) Thermal, emotional and perceptual evaluations of a park: cross-cultural and environmental attitude comparisons. Build Environ 43(9):1483–1490Google Scholar
  21. Lin T, de Dear RJ, Hwang R (2011) Effect of thermal adaptation on seasonal outdoor thermal comfort. Int J Climatol 31(2):302–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Middel A, Selover N, Hagen B, Chhetri N (2016) Impact of shade on outdoor thermal comfort – a seasonal field study in Tempe, Arizona. Int J Biometeorol 60:1849–1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakano J, Tanabe S, Kimura K (2002) Differences in perception of indoor environment between Japanese and non-Japanese workers. Energ Build 34:615–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ndetto EL, Matzarakis A (2017) Assessment of human thermal perception in the hot-humid climate of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Int J Biometeorol 61:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicol JF, Humphreys MA (2002) Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Energ Build 34:563–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nikolopoulou M, Steemers K (2003) Thermal comfort and psychological adaptation as a guide for designing urban spaces. Energ Build 35:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pearlmutter D (2007) Architecture and climate: the environmental continuum. Geography Compass 1(4):752–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pearlmutter D, Jiao D, Garb Y (2014) The relationship between bioclimatic thermal stress and subjective thermal sensation in pedestrian spaces. Int J Biometeorol 58:2111–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pitts A (2006) The languages and semantics of thermal comfort. In: Proceedings of NCEUB conference: comfort and energy use in buildings – getting them right, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 27–30 April 2006Google Scholar
  30. Plous S (1993) The psychology of judgment and decision making. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Roaf S (2006) Comfort, culture and climate change. In: Proceedings of NCEUB conference: comfort and energy use in buildings – getting them right, Cumberland lodge, Windsor, UK, 27–30 April 2006Google Scholar
  32. Saaroni H, Pearlmutter D, Hatuka T (2015) Human-biometeorological conditions and thermal perception in a Mediterranean coastal urban park. Int J Biometeorol 59:1347–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schiller S, Evans JM (1998) Sustainable urban development: design guidelines for warm humid cities. Urban Design International 3(4):165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spagnolo J, de Dear RJ (2003) A field study of thermal comfort in outdoor and semi-outdoor environments in subtropical Sydney Australia. Build Environ 38:721–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sterman J (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. Stoops J (2002) An illustration of expectation differences in office thermal comfort. ACEEE Summer Study, AsimolarGoogle Scholar
  37. Triandis HC (1994) Culture and social behavior. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. van Hoof J (2008) Forty years of Fanger’s model of thermal comfort: comfort for all? Indoor Air 18:182–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilhite H, Nakagami H, Masuda T, Yamaga Y, Haneda H (1996) A cross-cultural analysis of household energy-use behaviour in Japan and Norway. Energy Policy 24(9):795–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yamtraipat N, Khedari J, Hirunlabh J (2005) Thermal comfort standards for air conditioned buildings in hot and humid Thailand considering additional factors of acclimatization and education level. Sol Energy 78:504–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yao R, Li B, Liu J (2009) A theoretical adaptive model of thermal comfort – adaptive predicted mean vote (aPMV). Build Environ 44:2089–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang Y, Zhao R (2008) Overall thermal sensation, acceptability and comfort. Build Environ 43:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang H, Huizenga C, Arens E, Yu T (2001) Considering individual physiological differences in a human thermal model. J Therm Biol 26:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dmitry Brychkov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yaakov Garb
    • 2
  • David Pearlmutter
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics National University of Ireland GalwayGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research Ben-Gurion University of the NegevBeershebaIsrael

Personalised recommendations