Advertisement

International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 61, Issue 9, pp 1667–1673 | Cite as

Climate effects on late-season flight times of Massachusetts butterflies

  • L. Zipf
  • E. H. Williams
  • R. B. Primack
  • S. Stichter
Original Paper

Abstract

Although the responses of living organisms to climate change are being widely investigated, little attention has been given to such effects late in the growing season. We studied the late-season flight times of 20 species of butterflies in a geographically limited region, the state of Massachusetts in the USA, by examining change in dates of flight over a 22-year period and in response to average monthly temperature and precipitation. By analyzing the last 10% of each year’s observations reported by observers of the Massachusetts Butterfly Club, we found that seven species remain in flight significantly later into the fall than they did two decades earlier, while two species show reduced late-season flight. Life history characteristics of the species, particularly voltinism and average fall flight dates, influenced whether warmer fall months led to increases or decreases in fall flight. Warmer Novembers often led to later fall flight, and wetter Augusts usually extended fall flight. These results document the effects of climate on late-season flight times of butterflies, add to an understanding of how warmer autumn conditions alter the phenology of different butterfly species, and show the usefulness of citizen science data.

Keywords

Phenology Autumn Voltinism Warming Citizen science 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the many members of the Massachusetts Butterfly Club for their extensive records of butterfly flight, and we thank Colleen Hitchcock for the discussion in planning the study. We are especially grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their comments that improved the manuscript and to Chris Briggs for statistical advice and assistance.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

All work reported in this study complies with the laws of the USA.

Welfare of animals

This article does not contain any experimentation with animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

484_2017_1347_MOESM1_ESM.docx (107 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 106 kb)

References

  1. Altermatt F (2010) Tell me what you eat and I’ll tell you when you fly: diet can predict phenological changes in response to climate change. Ecol Lett 13:1475–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowden JJ, Eskildsen A, Hansen RR, Olsen K, Kurle CM, Hoye TT (2015) High-Arctic butterflies become smaller with rising temperatures. Biol Lett 11:20150574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breed GA, Stichter S, Crone EE (2013) Climate-driven changes in northeastern U.S. butterfly communities. Nat Clim Chang 3:142–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks SJ, Self A, Powney GD, Pearse WD, Penn M, Paterson GLJ (2016) The influence of life history traits on the phenological response of British butterflies to climate variability since the late-19th century. Ecography 39:001–014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brower LP, Taylor OR, Williams EH, Slayback DA, Zubieta RR, Ramirez ML (2012) Decline of monarch butterflies overwintering in Mexico: is the migratory phenomenon at risk? Insect Conserv Divers 5:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diamond SE, Frame M, Martin RA, Buckley LB (2011) Species’ traits predict phenological responses to climate change in butterflies. Ecology 92:1005–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN (2010) Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:149–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellwood ER, Diez JM, Ibanez I, Primack RB, Kobori H, Higuchi H, Silander JA (2012) Disentangling the paradox of insect phenology: are temporal trends reflecting the response to warming? Oecologia 168:1161–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fenberg PB, Self A, Stewart JR, Wilson RJ, Brooks SJ (2016) Exploring the universal ecological responses to climate change in a univoltine butterfly. J Anim Ecol 85:739–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forister ML, Shapiro AM (2003) Climatic trends and advancing spring flight of butterflies in lowland California. Glob Chang Biol 9:1130–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallinat A, Primack R, Wagner DL (2015) Autumn, the neglected season in climate change research. Trends Ecol Evol. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.004 Google Scholar
  12. Hellman JJ, Pelini SL, Prior KM, Dzurisin JDK (2008) The response of two butterfly species to climatic variation at the edge of their range and the implications for poleward range shifts. Oecologia 157:583–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howard E, Davis AK (2015) Tracking the fall migration of eastern monarchs with journey north roost sightings. In: Oberhauser KS, Nail KR, Altizer S (eds) Monarchs in a changing world: biology and conservation of an iconic butterfly. Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca, pp 207–214Google Scholar
  14. IBM Corp (2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0. IBM Corp, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
  15. Kearney MR, Briscoe NJ, Karoly DJ, Porter WP, Norgate M, Sunnucks P (2010) Early emergence in a butterfly causally linked to anthropogenic warming. Biol Lett 6:674–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kharouba HM, Paquette SR, Kerr JT, Vellend M (2013) Predicting the sensitivity of butterfly phenology to temperature over the past century. Glob Chang Biol. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12429 Google Scholar
  17. Klockmann M, Schroder U, Fischer K, Fischer K (2016) Simulating effects of climate change under direct and diapause development in a butterfly. Entomol Exp Appl 158:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lemoine NP (2015) Climate change may alter breeding ground distributions of eastern migratory monarchs (Danaus plexippus) via range expansion of Asclepias host plants. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118614 Google Scholar
  19. Mason SC, Palmer G, Fox R, Gillings S, Hill JK, Thomas CD, Oliver TH (2015) Geographical range margins of many taxonomic groups continue to shift polewards. Biol J Linn Soc 115:586–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Massachusetts Butterfly Club (2016) Massachusetts butterfly flight dates. http://www.naba.org/chapters/nabambc/flight-dates-chart.asp
  21. McLaughlin JF, Hellman JJ, Boggs CL, Ehrlich PR (2002) Climate change hastens population extinctions. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 99:6070–6074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller-Rushing AJ, Lloyd-Evans TL, Primack RB, Satzinger P (2008) Bird migration times, climate change, and declining population sizes. Glob Chang Biol 14:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliver TH, Marshall HH, Morecroft MD, Brereton T, Prudhomme C, Huntingford C (2015) Interacting effects of climate change and habitat fragmentation on drought-sensitive butterflies. Nat Clim Chang 5:941–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Opler PA, Krizek GO (1984) Butterflies east of the Great Plains. Johns Hopkins Univ Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  25. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary response to recent climate change. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pateman RM, Hill JK, Roy DB, Fox R, Thomas CD (2012) Temperature-dependent alterations in host use drive rapid range expansion in a butterfly. Science 336:1028–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Polgar CA, Primack RB, Williams EH, Stichter S, Hitchcock C (2013) Climate effects on the flight period of Lycaenid butterflies in Massachusetts. Biol Conserv 160:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  29. Roy DB, Sparks TH (2000) Phenology of British butterflies and climate change. Glob Chang Biol 6:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roy DB, Oliver TH, Botham MS, Beckmann B, Brereton T, Dennis RLH, Harrower C, Phillimore AB, Thomas JA (2015) Similarities in butterfly emergence dates among populations suggest local adaptation to climate. Glob Chang Biol 21:3313–3322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Westwood AR, Blair D (2010) Effect of regional climate warming on the phenology of butterflies in boreal forests in Manitoba, Canada. Environ Entomol 39:1122–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams EH, Stichter SB, Hitchcock C, Polgar CA, Primack RB (2014) Phenological advancement of Lycaenid butterflies in Massachusetts. J Lepid Soc 68:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zipkin EF, Ries L, Reeves R, Regetz J, Oberhauser KS (2012) Tracking climate impacts on the migratory monarch butterfly. Glob Chang Biol 18:3039–3049CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Zipf
    • 1
  • E. H. Williams
    • 2
  • R. B. Primack
    • 1
  • S. Stichter
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologyBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyHamilton CollegeClintonUSA
  3. 3.Massachusetts Butterfly ClubCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations