Effects of sulfur bath on hip osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled, single-blind, follow-up trial: a pilot study
- 357 Downloads
The effects of balneotherapy were evaluated in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. This randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded study enrolled outpatients with hip osteoarthritis according to ACR criteria. In addition to home exercise therapy, one patient group received balneotherapy for 3 weeks on 15 occasions. The mineral water used in this study is one of the mineral waters with the highest sulfide ion content (13.2 mg/L) in Hungary. The control group received exercise therapy alone. The WOMAC Likert 3.1 index and the EQ-5D quality of life self-administered questionnaire were completed three times during the study: prior to first treatment, at the end of the 3-week treatment course, and 12 weeks later. The main endpoint was achievement of Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) at 12 weeks, defined as ≥7.9 points in a normalized WOMAC function score. The intention to treat analysis included 20 controls and 21 balneotherapy patients. At 12 weeks, 17 (81 %) balneotherapy group patients had Minimal Clinically Important Improvement and 6 (30 %) of controls (p = 0.001). Comparing the results of the two groups at the end of treatment, there was a significant difference in the WOMAC stiffness score only, whereas after 12 weeks, the WOMAC pain, stiffness, function, and total scores also showed a significant difference in favor of the balneotherapy group. The difference between the two groups was significant after 12 weeks in point of EQVAS score, too. The results of our study suggest that the combination of balneotherapy and exercise therapy achieves more sustained improvement of joint function and decreases in pain than exercise therapy alone.
KeywordsMineral Water Exercise Therapy WOMAC Pain Sulfur Water WOMAC Index
We would like to thank Ms. Katalin Hodosi (Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Center, University of Debrecen, Hungary) for the statistical analysis and Ms. Melinda Venczel and Mrs. Andrea Csirmaz (Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Center, Mezőkövesd, Hungary) for their physiotherapy work.
Compliance with ethical standard
Before starting treatment, participants read the patient information sheet and signed the consent form. The study was approved by the Regional Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 1046-294/2013).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840Google Scholar
- Fernandes L, Hagen KB, Bijlsma JW, Andreassen O, Christensen P, Conaghan PG, Doherty M, Geenen R, Hammond A, Kjeken I, Lohmander LS, Lund H, Mallen CD, Nava T, Oliver S, Pavelka K, Pitsillidou I, da Silva JA, de la Torre J, Zanoli G, Vliet Vlieland TP (2013) EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 72:1125–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forestier R (2000) Magnitude and duration of the effects of two spa therapy courses on knee and hip osteoarthritis: an open prospective study in 51 consecutive patients. Joint Bone Spine 67:296–304Google Scholar
- Fortunati NA, Fioravanti A, Seri G, Cinelli S, Tenti S (2015) May spa therapy be a valid opportunity to treat hand osteoarthritis? A review of clinical trials and mechanisms of action. Int J Biometeorol, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
- Fransen M, McConnell S, Hernandez-Molina G, Reichenbach S (2014) Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD007912Google Scholar
- Kovács C (2008) SPA therapy in Hungary. Press Therm Climat 145:187–190Google Scholar
- Krauß I, Steinhilber B, Haupt G, Miller R, Martus P, Janßen P (2014) Exercise therapy in hip osteoarthritis—a randomized controlled trial. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111:592–599Google Scholar
- McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Hawker GA, Henrotin Y, Hunter DJ, Kawaguchi H, Kwoh K, Lohmander S, Rannou F, Roos EM, Underwood M (2014) OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 22:363–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Péntek M, Genti G, Pintye A, Ratkó I (1999) A WOMAC VA3.0 index magyar verziójának vizsgálata térd- és csípőarthrosisos betegeken. Magyar Reumatológia 94-97Google Scholar
- Peter WF, Jansen MJ, Hurkmans EJ, Bloo H, Dekker J, Dilling RG, Hilberdink W, Kersten-Smit C, de Rooij M, Veenhof C, Vermeulen HM, de Vos RJ, Schoones JW, Vliet Vlieland TP, Guideline Steering Committee - Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis (2011) Physiotherapy in hip and knee osteoarthritis: development of a practice guideline concerning initial assessment, treatment and evaluation. Acta Reumatol Port 36:268–281Google Scholar
- Tak E, Staats P, Van Hespen A, Hopman-Rock M (2005) The effects of an exercise program for older adults with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Rheumatol 32:1106–1113Google Scholar
- Tubach F, Ravaud P, Beaton D, Boers M, Bombardier C, Felson DT, van der Heijde D, Wells G, Dougados M (2007) Minimal clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state for subjective outcome measures in rheumatic disorders. J Rheumatol 34(5):1188–93Google Scholar
- Zhang W, Nuki G, Moskowitz RW, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden NK, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P (2010) OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Part III: changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2010. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18:476–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar