International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 60, Issue 9, pp 1439–1452 | Cite as

Influence of ground surface characteristics on the mean radiant temperature in urban areas

  • Fredrik Lindberg
  • Shiho Onomura
  • C. S. B. Grimmond
Original Paper

Abstract

The effect of variations in land cover on mean radiant temperature (Tmrt) is explored through a simple scheme developed within the radiation model SOLWEIG. Outgoing longwave radiation is parameterised using surface temperature observations on a grass and an asphalt surface, whereas outgoing shortwave radiation is modelled through variations in albedo for the different surfaces. The influence of ground surface materials on Tmrt is small compared to the effects of shadowing. Nevertheless, altering ground surface materials could contribute to a reduction in Tmrt to reduce the radiant load during heat-wave episodes in locations where shadowing is not an option. Evaluation of the new scheme suggests that despite its simplicity it can simulate the outgoing fluxes well, especially during sunny conditions. However, it underestimates at night and in shadowed locations. One grass surface used to develop the parameterisation, with very different characteristics compared to an evaluation grass site, caused Tmrt to be underestimated. The implications of using high temporal resolution (e.g. 15 minutes) meteorological forcing data under partly cloudy conditions are demonstrated even for fairly proximal sites.

Keywords

SOLWEIG Surface temperature Gothenburg London 

Supplementary material

484_2016_1135_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Ali-Toudert F, Mayer H (2007) Thermal comfort in an east-west oriented street canyon in Freiburg (Germany) under hot summer conditions. Theor Appl Climatol 87:223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson-Sköld Y, Thorsson S, Rayner D, Lindberg F, Janhäll S, Jonsson A, Moback U, Bergman R, Granberg M (2015) An integrated method for assessing climate-related risks and adaptation alternatives in urban areas. Climate Risk Manag 7:31–50Google Scholar
  3. Bogren J, Gustavsson T, Karlsson M, Postgård U (2000) The impact of screening on road surface temperature. Meteorol Appl 7:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruse M, Fleer H (1998) Simulating surface-plant-air interactions inside urban environments with a three dimensional numerical model. Environ Model Softw 13:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y-C, Lin T-P, Matzarakis A (2014) Comparison of mean radiant temperature from field experiment and modelling: a case study in Freiburg, Germany. Theor Appl Climatol 118:535–551Google Scholar
  6. Cluis DA (1972) Relationship between stream water temperature and ambient air temperature—a simple autoregressive model for mean daily stream water temperature fluctuations. Nord Hydrol 3:65–71Google Scholar
  7. Crawford TM, Duchon CE (1999) An improved parameterization for estimating effective atmospheric emissivity for use in calculating daytime downwelling longwave radiation. J Appl Meteorol 38:474–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erell E, Pearlmutter D, Boneh D, Kutiel PB (2014) Effect of high-albedo materials on pedestrian heat stress in urban street canyons. Urban Climate 10:367–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fanger PO (1970) Thermal Comfort-Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen. 256 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Holmer B, Lindberg F, Rayner D, Thorsson, S (2015) How to transform the standing man from a box to a cylinder—a modified methodology to calculate mean radiant temperature in field studies and models, ICUC9—9 th International Conference on Urban Climate jointly with AMS 12th Symposium on the Urban Environment, BPH5: Human perception and new indicators. Toulouse, JulyGoogle Scholar
  11. Höppe P (1992) A new procedure to determine the mean radiant temperature outdoors. Wetter unt Leben 44:147–151Google Scholar
  12. Jonsson P, Eliasson I, Holmer B, Grimmond CSB (2006) Longwave incoming radiation in the Tropics: results from field work in three African cities. Theor Appl Climatol 85:185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kántor N, Lin T-P, Matzarakis A (2014) Daytime relapse of the mean radiant temperature based on the six-directional method under unobstructed solar radiation. Int J Biometeorol 58:1615–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Konarska J, Lindberg F, Larsson A, Thorsson S, Holmer B (2014) Transmissivity of solar radiation through crowns of single urban trees—application for outdoor thermal comfort modelling. Theor Appl Climatol 117:363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kotthaus S, Grimmond CSB (2014) Energy exchange in a dense urban environment—part I: temporal variability of long-term observations in central London. Urban Climate 10(2):262–280Google Scholar
  16. Krüger EL, Minella FO, Rasia F (2011) Impact of urban geometry on outdoor thermal comfort and air quality from field measurements in Curitiba, Brazil. Build Environ 46:621–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lau KK-L, Ren C, Ho J, Ng E (2015) Numerical modelling of mean radiant temperature in high-density sub-tropical urban environment. Energy Build. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.035
  18. Lindberg F, Grimmond CSB (2010) Continuous sky view factor maps from high resolution urban digital elevation models. Clim Res 42:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindberg F, Grimmond CSB (2011a) Nature of vegetation and building morphology characteristics across a city: influence on shadow patterns and mean radiant temperatures in London. Urban Ecosystems 14:617–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindberg F, Grimmond CSB (2011b) The influence of vegetation and building morphology on shadow patterns and mean radiant temperatures in urban areas: model development and evaluation. Theor Appl Climatol 105:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindberg F, Holmer B, Thorsson S (2008) SOLWEIG 1.0—modelling spatial variations of 3D radiant fluxes and mean radiant temperature in complex urban settings. Int J Biometeorol 52:697–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindberg F, Holmer B, Thorsson S, Rayner D (2013) Characteristics of the mean radiant temperature in high latitude cities—implications for sensitive climate planning applications. Int J Biometeorol 58:613–627Google Scholar
  23. Lindberg F, Jonsson P, Honjo T, Wästberg D (2015a) Solar energy on building envelopes—3D modelling in a 2D environment. Sol Energy 115:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindberg F, Grimmond CSB, Onomura S, Järvi L, Ward H (2015b) UMEP—an integrated tool for urban climatology and climate-sensitive planning applications. ICUC9—9 th International Conference on Urban Climate jointly with 12th Symposium on the Urban Environment, TUKUP7 (cont): Warning plans & Decision support tools. Toulouse, July 2015Google Scholar
  25. Masson V (2000) A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models. Bound-Layer Meteorol 94:357–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matzarakis A, Rutz F, Mayer H (2007) Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments—application of the RayMan model. Int J Biometeorol 51:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matzarakis A, Rutz F, Mayer H (2009) Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments: basics of the RayMan model. Int J Biometeorol 54:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayer H, Höppe P (1987) Thermal comfort of man in different urban environments. Theor Appl Climatol 38:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mayer H, Holst J, Dostal P, Imbery F, Schindler D (2008) Human thermal comfort in summer within an urban street canyon in Central Europe. Meteorol Z 17:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Müller N, Kuttler W, Barlag A-B (2014) Counteracting urban climate change: adaptation measures and their effect on thermal comfort. Theor Appl Climatol 115(1–2):243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nikolopoulou N, Baker N, Steemers K (1999) Improvements to the globe thermometer for outdoor use. Archit Sci Rev 42:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Offerle B, Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (2003) Parameterization of net allwave radiation for urban areas. J Appl Meteorol 42:1157–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oke T (1987) Boundary layer climates. Routledge, Cambridge, p. 435Google Scholar
  34. Ordnance Survey (2010) © Crown database right 2010. An Ordnance Survey/EDINA supplied service. [Available online at http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/.]
  35. Pearlmutter D, Berliner P, Shaviv E (2007) Integrated modeling of pedestrian energy exchange and thermal comfort in urban street canyons. Build Environ 42:2396–2409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prata AJ (1996) A new long-wave formula for estimating downward clear-sky radiation at the surface. Q J R Meteorol Soc 122:1127–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. QGIS Development Team (2015) QGIS geographic information system. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org
  38. Ratti CF, Richens P (1999) Urban texture analysis with image processing techniques. Proc CAADFutures99, Atalanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  39. Ratti CF, Richens P (2004) Raster analysis of urban form. Environ Plan B-Plan Des 31:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reindl DT, Beckman WA, Duffie JA (1990) Diffuse fraction correlation. Sol Energy 45:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmid HP, Cleugh HA, Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (1991) Spatial variability of energy fluxes in suburban terrain. Bound-Layer Meteorol 54:249–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thorsson S, Lindberg F, Eliasson I, Holmer B (2007) Different methods for estimating the mean radiant temperature in an outdoor urban setting. Int J Climatol 27:1983–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thorsson S, Rocklöv J, Konarska J, Lindberg F, Holmer B, Dousset B, Rayner D (2014) Mean radiant temperature—a predictor of heat related mortality. Urban Climate 10(Part 2):332–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. VDI (1998) Methods for the human-biometeorological assessment of climate and air hygiene for urban and regional planning. Part I: climate. VDI 3787, Part 2, Belin 29pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fredrik Lindberg
    • 1
  • Shiho Onomura
    • 1
  • C. S. B. Grimmond
    • 2
  1. 1.Göteborg Urban Climate Group, Earth Science CentreUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Department of MeteorologyUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations