Estimating the onset of spring from a complex phenology database: trade-offs across geographic scales
- 411 Downloads
Phenology is an important indicator of ecological response to climate change. Yet, phenological responses are highly variable among species and biogeographic regions. Recent monitoring initiatives have generated large phenological datasets comprised of observations from both professionals and volunteers. Because the observation frequency is often variable, there is uncertainty associated with estimating the timing of phenological activity. “Status monitoring” is an approach that focuses on recording observations throughout the full development of life cycle stages rather than only first dates in order to quantify uncertainty in generating phenological metrics, such as onset dates or duration. However, methods for using status data and calculating phenological metrics are not standardized. To understand how data selection criteria affect onset estimates of springtime leaf-out, we used status-based monitoring data curated by the USA National Phenology Network for 11 deciduous tree species in the eastern USA between 2009 and 2013. We asked, (1) How are estimates of the date of leaf-out onset, at the site and regional levels, influenced by different data selection criteria and methods for calculating onset, and (2) at the regional level, how does the timing of leaf-out relate to springtime minimum temperatures across latitudes and species? Results indicate that, to answer research questions at site to landscape levels, data users may need to apply more restrictive data selection criteria to increase confidence in calculating phenological metrics. However, when answering questions at the regional level, such as when investigating spatiotemporal patterns across a latitudinal gradient, there is low risk of acquiring erroneous results by maximizing sample size when using status-derived phenological data.
KeywordsPhenology Onset Leaf-out Phenological metrics Data selection Sampling frequency
Data were provided by the USA National Phenology Network and the many participants who contribute to its Nature’s Notebook program. Special thanks to Theresa Crimmins and Jake Weltzin for discussions and comments on earlier drafts. The project described in this publication was supported by Grant/Cooperative Agreement Number G14AC00405 from the United States Geological Survey.
- Bird TJ, Bates AE, Lefcheck JS, Hill N, Thomson R, Edgar GJ, Stuart-Smith RD, Wotherspoon SJ, Krkosek M, Stuart-Smith JF, Pecl GT, Barrett NS, Frusher SD (2014) Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets. Biological Conservation 173 doi: doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.037Google Scholar
- Denny EG, Gerst KL, Miller-Rushing AJ, Tierney GL, Crimmins TM, Enquist CAF, Guertin P, Rosemartin AH, Schwartz MD, Thomas KA, Weltzin JF (2014) Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plants and animal activity for science and resource management applications. Int J Biometeorol. doi: 10.1007/s00484-014-0789-5 Google Scholar
- Ellwood ER, Temple SA, Primack RB, Bradley NL, Davis CC (2013) Record-breaking early flowering in the eastern United States. Plos One 8 (1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053788Google Scholar
- EPA US (2014) Climate change indicators in the United States. Environmental Protection Agency www.epa.gov/climatechange/indicators.html
- Ferreira AS, Visser AW, MacKenzie BR, Payne MR (2014) Accuracy and precision in the calculation of phenology metrics. J Geophys Res Oceans:n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1002/2014jc010323
- Hurlbert AH, Liang Z (2012) Spatiotemporal variation in avian migration phenology: citizen science reveals effects of climate change. Plos One 7 (2). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031662
- IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, p 151.Google Scholar
- Keatley MR, Hudson IL (2010) Phenological research methods for environmental and climate change analysis: introduction and overview. Phenol Res Methods Environ Climate Change Analysis. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3335-2_1
- McCormack ML, Gaines K, Pastore M, Eissenstat D (2014) Early season root production in relation to leaf production among six diverse temperate tree species. Plant Soil:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2347-7
- Morellato LPC, Camargo MGG, Neves FFD, Luize BG, Mantovani A, Hudson IL (2010) The influence of sampling method, sample size, and frequency of observations on plant phenological patterns and interpretation in tropical forest trees. Phenol Res Methods Environ Climate Change Analysis. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3335-2_5
- Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. In: Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, vol 37. Annual Rev Ecol Evol Syst. pp 637–669. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
- Rosemartin AH, Crimmins TM, Enquist CAF, Gerst KL, Kellermann JL, Posthumus EE, Weltzin JF, Denny EG, Guertin P, Marsh LR (2013) Organizing phenological data resources to inform natural resource conservation. biological conservation. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.003
- Thackeray SJ, Sparks TH, Frederiksen M, Burthe S, Bacon PJ, Bell JR, Botham MS, Brereton TM, Bright PW, Carvalho L, Clutton-Brock T, Dawson A, Edwards M, Elliott JM, Harrington R, Johns D, Jones ID, Jones JT, Leech DI, Roy DB, Scott WA, Smith M, Smithers RJ, Winfield IJ, Wanless S (2010) Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments. Glob Chang Biol 16(12):3304–3313. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02165.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tierney G, Mitchell B, Miller-Rushing A, Katz J, Denny E, Brauer C, Donovan T, Richardson AD, Toomey M, Kozlowski A, Weltzin J, Gerst K, Sharron E, Sonnentag O, Dieffenbach F (2013) Phenology monitoring protocol: Northeast Temperate Network. Natural Resource Report. NPS/NETN/NRR—2013/681. Fort Collins, COGoogle Scholar
- USA National Phenology Network (2013) Plant phenology data for the United States, 2009–2013. USA-NPN, Tucson, Arizona, USA. Data set accessed 15-08-2013 at http://www.usanpn.org/results/data.
- Wolkovich EM, Cook BI, Allen JM, Crimmins TM, Betancourt JL, Travers SE, Pau S, Regetz J, Davies TJ, Kraft NJB, Ault TR, Bolmgren K, Mazer SJ, McCabe GJ, McGill BJ, Parmesan C, Salamin N, Schwartz MD, Cleland EE (2012) Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change. Nature 485(7399):494–497. doi: 10.1038/nature11014 Google Scholar
- Zhang X, Tarpley D, Sullivan JT (2007) Diverse responses of vegetation phenology to a warming climate. Geophys Res Lett 34 (19). doi: 10.1029/2007gl031447