The how and why of societal publications for citizen science projects and scientists
- 647 Downloads
In the scientific community, the importance of communication to society is often underestimated. Scientists and scientific organisations often lack the skills to organise such communication effectively. The Dutch citizen science phenology network Nature’s Calendar has been successful in communicating to the general public via numerous newspaper articles, television appearances, presentations, websites and social media. We refer to these publications as societal publications. Due to active communication to mass media, we frequently reach millions of people. This communication helped us to involve thousands of volunteers in recording the timing of phenological events like the start of flowering, leaf unfolding and bird migration, but also several health-related events like hay fever symptoms and tick bites. In this paper, we analyse and present our experiences with the Nature’s Calendar project regarding societal publications. Based on this analysis, we explain the importance of societal publications for citizen science projects and scientists in general, and we show how scientists can increase the newsworthiness of scientific information and what factors and activities can increase the chances of media paying attention to this news. We show that societal publications help phenological networks by facilitating the recruitment, retention and instruction of observers. Furthermore, they stimulate the generation of new ideas and partners that lead to an increase in knowledge, awareness and behavioural change of the general public or specific stakeholders. They make projects, and scientists involved, better known to the public and increase their credibility and authority. Societal publications can catalyse the production of new publications, thereby enforcing the previous mentioned points.
KeywordsSocietal publications Citizen science Phenology Media attention
We thank all our volunteers that participated in reporting their observations to the various citizen science programmes mentioned in this paper. Furthermore, we want to thank the numerous partner organisations involved.
- Cosquer A, Raymond R, Prevot-Julliard A-C (2012) Observations of everyday biodiversity: a new perspective for conservation? Ecology and Society 17 (4 C7 - 2). doi:10.5751/es-04955-170402
- Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kubler K, Bissolli P, Braslavska OG, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl A, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Mage F, Mestre A, Nordli O, Penuelas J, Pirinen P, Remisova V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski F-E, Zach S, Zust ANA (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Chang Biol 12(10):1969–1976. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rodes BK, Odell R (1997) Dictionary of environmental quotations. Johns Hopkins University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Royal Society (2006) Science communication; survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. The Royal Society. doi:http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2006/1111111395.pdf