International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 58, Issue 8, pp 1749–1758

Natural history museum collections provide information on phenological change in British butterflies since the late-nineteenth century

  • Stephen J. Brooks
  • Angela Self
  • Flavia Toloni
  • Tim Sparks
Original Paper


Museum collections have the potential to provide valuable information on the phenological response of organisms to climate change. This is particularly useful for those species for which few data otherwise exist, but also to extend time series to the period before other observational data are available. To test this potential, we analysed data from 2,630 specimens of four species of British butterflies (Anthocharis cardamines, Hamearis lucina, Polyommatus bellargus and Pyrgus malvae), collected from 1876 to 1999 and stored in the Natural History Museum, London, UK (NHM). In A. cardamines, first-generation P. bellargus and P. malvae, we found that there was a strong significant negative relationship between spring temperature and 10th percentile collection dates, which approximates mean first appearance date, and median collection date, which approximates mean flight date. In all four species, there was a significant negative relationship between the 10th percentile collection date and the length of the collection period, which approximates flight period. In second-generation P. bellargus, these phenological measurements were correlated with summer temperature. We found that the rates of phenological response to temperature, based on NHM data, were similar to, or somewhat greater than, those reported for other organisms based on observational data covering the last 40 years. The lower rate of phenological response, and the significant influence of February rather than March or April temperatures, in recent decades compared with data from earlier in the twentieth century may indicate that early emerging British butterfly species are currently approaching the limits of phenological advancement in response to recent climate warming.


Butterflies Climate change Museum collections Phenology 


  1. Alexander LV, Jones PD (2000) Updated precipitation series for the U.K. and discussion of recent extremes. Atmos Sci Lett 1:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartomeus I, Ascher JS, Wagner D, Danforth BN, Colla S, Kornbluth S, Winfree R (2011) Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and bee-pollinated plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:20645–20649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boakes EH, McGowan PJK, Fuller RA, Ding C-Q, Clark NE, O’Connor K, Mace GM (2010) PLoS Biol 8:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke JE (1936) The history of British phenology. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 62:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Croxton PJ, Huber K, Collinson N, Sparks TH (2006) How well do the Central England Temperature and England and Wales Precipitation series represent the climate of the UK? Int J Climatol 26:2287–2292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diamond SE, Frame AM, Martin RA, Buckley LB (2011) Species’ traits predict phenological responses to climate change in butterflies. Ecology 92:1005–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duncan K (1991) A comparison of the temperature records of Edinburgh and Central England. Weather 46:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forister ML, Shapiro AM (2003) Climatic trends and advancing spring flight of butterflies in lowland California. Glob Chang Biol 9:1130–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An (R) companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrington R, Woiwod IP, Sparks TH (1999) Climate change and trophic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 14:146–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson K, Brooks SJ, Fenberg P, Glover A, James K, Lister A, Michel E, Spencer M, Todd J, Valsami-Jones E, Young J, Stewart J (2011) Climate change and biosphere response: unlocking the collections vault. Bioscience 61:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lumley T, Miller A (2009) Leaps: regression subset selection. R package version 2.9.
  13. Manley G (1974) Central England Temperatures: monthly means 1659 to 1973. Q J R Meteorol Soc 100:389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller-Rushing AJ, Primack RB (2008) Global warming and flowering times in Thoreau’s concord: a community perspective. Ecology 89:332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Jenkins GJ, Boorman PM, Booth BBB, Brown CC, Clark RT, Collins M, Harris GR, Kendon EJ, Betts RA, Brown SJ, Howard TP, Humphrey KA, McCarthy MP, McDonald RE, Stephens A, Wallace R, Wilby RL, Wood RA (2009) UK Climate Projections Science Report: climate change projections. Met Office Hadley Centre, ExeterGoogle Scholar
  16. Parker DE, Horton EB (2005) Uncertainties in the Central England Temperature series since 1878 and some changes to the maximum and minimum series. Int J Climatol 25:1173–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parker DE, Legg TP, Folland CK (1992) A new daily Central England Temperature Series, 1772–1991. Int J Climatol 12:317–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Polgar CA, Primack RB, Williams EH, Stichter S, Hitchcock C (2013) Climate effects on the flight period of Lycaenid butterflies in Massachuetts. Biol Conserv 160:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pyke GH, Ehrlich PR (2010) Biological collections and ecological/environmental research: a review, some observations and a look to the future. Biol Rev 85:247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  22. Roy DB, Sparks TH (2000) Phenology of British butterflies and climate change. Glob Chang Biol 6:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smithers R, Sparks TH (2010) Climate is what we expect, weather is what we get. Brit Wildl 21:236–239Google Scholar
  24. Sparks TH, Crick HQP (1999) The times they are a-changing? Bird Conserv Int 9:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sparks TH, Yates TJ (1997) The effect of spring temperature on the appearance dates of British butterflies 1883–1993. Ecography 20:368–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sparks TH, Huber K, Dennis RLH (2006) Complex phenological responses to climate warming trends? Lessons from history. Eur J Entomol 103:379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thackeray SJ, Sparks TH, Frederiksen M, Burthe S, Bacon PJ, Bell JR, Botham MS, Brereton TM, Bright PW, Carvalho L, Clutton-Brock T, Dawson A, Edwards M, Elliott JM, Harrington R, Johns D, Jones ID, Jones JT, Leech DI, Roy DB, Scott WA, Smith M, Smithers RJ, Winfield IJ, Wanless S (2010) Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments. Glob Chang Biol 16:3304–3313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Visser ME, Both C (2005) Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick. Proc Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 272:2561–2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin JM, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Brooks
    • 1
  • Angela Self
    • 1
  • Flavia Toloni
    • 1
  • Tim Sparks
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Life SciencesNatural History MuseumLondonUK
  2. 2.SigmaCoventry UniversityCoventryUK
  3. 3.Fachgebiet für ÖkoklimatologieTechnische Universität MünchenFreisingGermany
  4. 4.Institute for Advanced StudyTechnische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany
  5. 5.Institute of ZoologyPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznańPoland
  6. 6.Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations