Phenology research for natural resource management in the United States
- 568 Downloads
Natural resource professionals in the United States recognize that climate-induced changes in phenology can substantially affect resource management. This is reflected in national climate change response plans recently released by major resource agencies. However, managers on-the-ground are often unclear about how to use phenological information to inform their management practices. Until recently, this was at least partially due to the lack of broad-based, standardized phenology data collection across taxa and geographic regions. Such efforts are now underway, albeit in very early stages. Nonetheless, a major hurdle still exists: phenology-linked climate change research has focused more on describing broad ecological changes rather than making direct connections to local to regional management concerns. To help researchers better design relevant research for use in conservation and management decision-making processes, we describe phenology-related research topics that facilitate “actionable” science. Examples include research on evolution and phenotypic plasticity related to vulnerability, the demographic consequences of trophic mismatch, the role of invasive species, and building robust ecological forecast models. Such efforts will increase phenology literacy among on-the-ground resource managers and provide information relevant for short- and long-term decision-making, particularly as related to climate response planning and implementing climate-informed monitoring in the context of adaptive management. In sum, we argue that phenological information is a crucial component of the resource management toolbox that facilitates identification and evaluation of strategies that will reduce the vulnerability of natural systems to climate change. Management-savvy researchers can play an important role in reaching this goal.
KeywordsClimate change Species interactions Forecasting Vulnerability assessment Phenology literacy
We thank Jake Weltzin, David Inouye, Alyssa Rosemartin, David Moore, and two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their respective funding agencies and organizations.
- Austen DJ (2011) Landscape Conservation Cooperatives: a science-based network in support of conservation. The Wildlife Professional, Fall, 2011Google Scholar
- Bagne KE, Friggens MM, Finch DM (2011). A system for assessing vulnerability of species (SAVS) to climate change. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research StationGoogle Scholar
- Carpenter SR, Bennett EM, Peterson GD (2006) Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecol Soc 11(1):29Google Scholar
- Cahill AE, Aiello-Lammens ME, Fisher-Reid MC, Hua X, Karanewsky CJ, Yeong Ryu H, Sbeglia GC, Spagnolo F, Waldron JB, Warsi O, Wiens JJ (2012) How does climate change cause extinction? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280 online early doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1890.
- Denny EG, Gerst KL, Miller-Rushing AJ, Tierney GL, Crimmins TM, Enquist CAF, Guertin P, Rosemartin AH, Schwartz MD, Thomas KA, Weltzin JF (2013) Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plants and animal activity for science and resource management applications. Int J Biometeorol. (in press) Google Scholar
- Diez JM, Ibáñez I, Miller-Rushing AJ, Mazer SJ, Crimmins TM, Crimmins MA, Bertelsen, CD, Inouye DW (2012) Forecasting phenology: from species variability to community patterns. Ecol lett 15:545–553Google Scholar
- Enquist CAF, Miller-Rushing AJ (2011) Standards and tools for using phenology in science, management, and education. Park Sci 28(2):70Google Scholar
- Enquist CAF, Rosemartin A, Schwartz MD (2012) Identifying and prioritizing phenological data products and tools. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 93 (37):356.Google Scholar
- Glick P, Stein BA, Edelson NA (eds) (2011) Scanning the conservation horizon: a guide to climate change vulnerability assessment. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
- Herms DA (2004) Using degree-days and plant phenology to predict pest activity. In: V. Krischik and J. Davidson, Eds. IPM (Integrated Pest Management) of Midwest Landscapes, pp. 49–59. Minnesota Experiment Station Publication SB-07645, 316 pp.Google Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A.(eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 pp.Google Scholar
- Knudsen E, Lindén A, Both C, Jonzén N, Pulido F, Saino N, Sutherland WJ, Bach LA, Coppack T, Ergon T, Gienapp P, Gill JA, Gordo O, Hedenström A, Lehikoinen E, Marra PP, Møller AP, Nilsson ALK, Péron G, Ranta E, Rubolini D, Sparks TH, Spina F, Studds CE, Sæther SA, Tryjanowski P, Stenseth NC (2011) Challenging claims in the study of migratory birds and climate change. Biol Rev 86:928–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston TA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vazquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein A-M, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kuebler K, Bissolli P, Braslavska OG, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl A, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatcza K, Mage F, Mestre A, Nordli O, Penuelas J, Pirinen P, Remisova V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, Van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski F-E, Zach S, Zust A (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Chang Biol 12:1969–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller-Rushing AJ, Evenden A, Gross J, Mitchell B, Sachs S (2011) Parks use phenology to improve management and communicate climate change. Park Sci 28:61–67Google Scholar
- Morecroft MD, Bealey CE, Beaumont DA, Benham S, Brooks DR, Burt TP, Critchley CNR, Dick J, Littlewood NA, Monteith DT, Scott WA, Smith RI, Walmsey C, Watson H (2009) The UK Environmental Change Network: emerging trends in the composition of plant and animal communities and the physical environment. Biol Conserv 142:2814–2832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) (2011) Science strategy: enabling continental-scale ecological forecasting, pp. 55Google Scholar
- Nolan VP, Weltzin JF (2011) Phenology for science, resource management, decision making, and education. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 92 (2):15.Google Scholar
- Ozgul A, Childs DZ, Oli MK, Armitage KB, Blumstein DT, Olson LE, Tuljapurkar S, Coulson T (2010) Coupled dynamics of body mass and population growth in response to environmental change. Nature 466(7305):482–485Google Scholar
- Pereira HM, Ferrier S, Walters M, Geller GN, Jongman RHG, Scholes RJ, Bruford MW, Brummitt N, Butchart SHM, Cardoso AC, Coops NC, Dulloo E, Faith DP, Freyhof J, Gregory RD, Heip C, Höft R, Hurtt G, Jetz W, Karp DS, McGeoch MA, Obura D, Onoda Y, Pettorelli N, Reyers B, Sayre R, Scharlemann JPW, Stuart SN, Turak E, Walpole M, Wegmann M (2013) Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339(6117):277–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Post E, Forchhammer MC (2008) Climate change reduces reproductive success of an Arctic herbivore through trophic mismatch. Phil Trans R SocB-Biol Sci 363(1501):2369–2375Google Scholar
- Richardson AD, Black TA, Ciais P, Delbart N, Friedl MA, Gobron N, Hollinger DY, Kutsch WL, Longdoz B, Luyssaert S, Migliavacca M, Montagnani L, Munger JW, Moors E, Piao S, Rebmann C, Reichstein M, Saigusa N, Tomelleri E, Vargas R, Varlagin A (2010) Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity. Philos Trans R Soc, B 365:3227–3246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosemartin AH, Crimmins TM, Enquist CAF, Gerst KL, Kellermann JL, Posthumus EE, Denny EG, Guertin P, Marsh LM, Weltzin JW (2013) Organizing phenological data resources to inform natural resource conservation. Biological Conservation doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.003
- USDA Forest Service (USFS) (2009) Forest Service Global Change Research Strategy, 2009–2019. http://www.fs.fed.us/climatechange/documents/global-change-strategy.pdf. Accessed 29 November 2012.
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2012) Climate Change Indicators in the United States. http://epa.gov/climatechange/pdfs/climateindicators-full.pdf. Accessed 29 November 2012.
- US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2010) Rising to the Urgent Challenge: Strategic Plan for Responding to Accelerating Climate Change. September 2010. http://www.fws.gov/home/climatechange/pdf/CCStrategicPlan.pdf. Accessed 29 November 2012.
- US National Park Service (NPS) (2010) National Park Service Climate Change Response Strategy. September 2010. Fort Collins, Colorado. http://www.nature.nps.gov/climatechange/docs/NPS_CCRS.pdf. Accessed 29 November 2012.
- Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. McMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Williams BK, Brown ED (2012) Adaptive Management: The U.S. Department of the Interior Applications Guide. Adaptive Management Working Group, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Young B, Byers E, Gravuer K, Hammerson G, Redder A (2010) Guidelines for using the NatureServe Climate Change Vulnerability Index. NatureServe, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar