On the nature of canopy illumination due to differences in elemental orientation and aggregation for radiative transfer
- First Online:
- 144 Downloads
The nature of canopy radiative transfer mechanism (CRTM) describes the amount of beam penetration through a canopy and governs the nature of canopy illumination, i.e. the abundance of sunlit and shaded portions. Realistic representation of canopy illumination is critical for simulating various canopy biophysical processes associated with vegetated land surfaces. The adequate representation of CRTM can be attributed to the parameterizations of the two main canopy characteristics: the foliage projection (G-function) and the clumping effect (Ω function). Herein, using various types of G and Ω functions developed in a previous study, I tested 15 CRTM scenarios that combine different types of G and Ω functions to predict the dynamics of sunlit fraction (ε) of canopies having a wide range of plant area index (Ptotal) at various solar zenith angles (SZAs). It was observed that, for a given Ptotal, ε decreases as the SZA increases. However, ε significantly changed in accordance with the type of G and Ω functions used. Scenarios that employed random distribution of elements in space (S-4, S-9, and S-14) consistently returned larger ε values even at lower SZAs. This means that ignoring the clumping behavior of canopies could result in greater proportion of sunlit elements thereby reducing the beam penetration deeper into the canopy as opposed to those canopies where the elements are more aggregated. Beyond 70° SZA, almost all the scenarios returned similar ε values for a given Ptotal, which implied that the methods used is less sensitive at higher SZAs. The values of ε calculated by all the scenarios were significantly different from the S-6 (the ideal case). This observation highlights the importance of explicitly describing the G and Ω functions to adequately depict canopy illumination conditions.
- Dickinson RE, Sellers AH, Kennedy PJ, Wilson MF (1986) ‘Biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) for the NCAR community climate model’, InNCAR Tech. Note TN-275, National Center for Atmosphere Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
- Govind A, Chen JM, McDonnell J, Kumari J, Sonnentag O (2010) Effect of lateral hydrological processes on photosynthesis and evapotranspiration. Ecohydrology.3. (doi: 10.1002/eco.141).
- Govind A, Chen JM, Margolis H, Ju W, Sonnentag O, Giasson MA (2009a) A spatially explicit hydro-ecological modeling framework (BEPS-TerrainLab V2.0): model description and test in a boreal ecosystem in Eastern North America. J Hydrol 367:200–216. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lang ARG, Xiang Y (1986) Estimation of leaf area index from transmission of direct sunlight in discontinuous canopies. Agric For Meteorol 37(3):229–243Google Scholar
- Lemeur R, Blad BL (1974) A critical review of light models for estimating the shortwave radiation regime of plant canopies. Agric Meteorol 14(255):286Google Scholar
- Monsi M, Saeki T (1953) Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Japanese Journal of Botany 14:22–52Google Scholar
- Nilson T, Ross J (1997) Modeling radiative transfer through forest canopies: implications for canopy photosynthesis and remote sensing. The use of remote sensing in the modeling of forest productivity, pp. 23–60Google Scholar
- Ross J (1981) The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands. Dr. W. Junk, Norwell, Mass., USA, p. 391Google Scholar
- Stenberg P, Linder S, Smolander H, Flower-Ellis J (1994) Performance of the LAI- (2000) Plant canopy analyzer in estimating leaf area index of some Scotspine stands. Tree Physiology 14:981–995Google Scholar